quote:

ORIGINAL: Daddysredhead

Dear Steven,

It seems that you have gotten yourself involved in a pickle, wrapped up in a clusterphuk, and stuffed into a web of untruthfulness.  Hmmm....  I would have to say that you both go into the naughty corner - but not together - we can't reward bad behavior that way.  Integrity and honesty must never be compromised.  You must send this lying hussy on her way.  As for you...  well, dear man, I think you are having a slip in your personal identity.  It seems that the thought of this lusty wench caused you to breach your own code of ethics.  She's obviously no good for you, it's better that she's gone now.  Good lord, man, look at you!  You're hardly recognizable!  *smacks ya' around a bit to knock the sense back into you*  There now... are you a little more back to normal?

If yes, then my work here is done.  *giggles*  

quote:

The usual techniques for proving things are often inadequate because they are merely concerned with truth. For more practical objectives, there are other powerful - but generally unacknowledged - methods. Here is an (undoubtedly incomplete) list of them:
Proof of Blatant Assertion:

Use words and phrases like "clearly...,""obviously...,""it is easily shown that...," and "as any fool can plainly see..."

Proof by Seduction:

"If you will just agree to believe this, you might get a better final grade."

Proof by Intimidation:

"You better believe this if you want to pass the course."

Proof by Interruption:

Keep interrupting until your opponent gives up.

Proof by Misconception:

An example of this is the Freshman's Conception of the Limit Process: "2 equals 3 for large values of 2." Once introduced, any conclusion is reachable.

Proof by Obfuscation:

A long list of lemmas is helpful in this case - the more, the better.

Proof by Confusion:

This is a more refined form of proof by obfuscation. The long list of lemmas should be arranged into circular patterns of reasoning - and perhaps more baroque structures such as figure-eights and fleurs-de-lis.

Proof by Exhaustion:

This is a modification of an inductive proof. Instead of going to the general case after proving the first one, prove the second case, then the third, then the fourth, and so on - until a sufficiently large n is achieved whereby the nth case is being propounded to a soundly sleeping audience.

Then again if it doesn't matter, does it really have any mass?

quote:

ORIGINAL: lronitulstahp

quote:

ORIGINAL: Daddysredhead

Tulip...  why must you make the Dick so big?  hehehe...  oh yeah, it's just a natural occurence when you're around! 

i sooo like you.......

quote:

ORIGINAL: beargonewild

quote:

ORIGINAL: Daddysredhead

Dear Steven,

It seems that you have gotten yourself involved in a pickle, wrapped up in a clusterphuk, and stuffed into a web of untruthfulness.  Hmmm....  I would have to say that you both go into the naughty corner - but not together - we can't reward bad behavior that way.  Integrity and honesty must never be compromised.  You must send this lying hussy on her way.  As for you...  well, dear man, I think you are having a slip in your personal identity.  It seems that the thought of this lusty wench caused you to breach your own code of ethics.  She's obviously no good for you, it's better that she's gone now.  Good lord, man, look at you!  You're hardly recognizable!  *smacks ya' around a bit to knock the sense back into you*  There now... are you a little more back to normal?

If yes, then my work here is done.  *giggles*  

Damn Red,that is so hawt how you spoke! *thud*

quote:

ORIGINAL: Thadius

Proof by Interruption:

Keep interrupting until your opponent gives up.

Proof by Exhaustion:

This is a modification of an inductive proof. Instead of going to the general case after proving the first one, prove the second case, then the third, then the fourth, and so on - until a sufficiently large n is achieved whereby the nth case is being propounded to a soundly sleeping audience.

quote:

ORIGINAL: GreedyTop

*adores SP*

quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven

I'm a 52 year old Dom and I have a submissive under consideration.  She's 25 years old, a previous Penthouse Pet, and she told me that she has a PhD from MIT in Particle Physics.

I have two questions.

1. I just found out that she only has a Master's in Particle Physics.  This concerns me because I inflexibly hold Integrity in high regard.  Normally, I would dismiss one who misrepresented herself to me. However, she has very big boobs, er... I mean that the compatibility and chemistry between us is incredibly fulfilling to me.  So should I make a onetime exception in my rigorous requirements for Truth and Honesty in a submissive?

2. I told her that I was 35 and sent her a picture of Brad Pitt, telling her that it was me.  What should I do when we first meet?

quote:

ORIGINAL: SoulPiercer

I would offer leg humps to Red and Tulip too .. but Greedy done wore me out.

quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven

quote:

ORIGINAL: beargonewild

What does the book say? 

See Dick.  See Dick Dominate Jane. 

quote:

ORIGINAL: SoulPiercer

I would offer leg humps to Red and Tulip too .. but Greedy done wore me out.

quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven

quote:

ORIGINAL: beargonewild

What does the book say? 

See Dick.  See Dick Dominate Jane.