Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Global warming's slippery slope...


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> Global warming's slippery slope... Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Global warming's slippery slope... - 9/13/2008 7:01:51 PM   
Thadius


Posts: 5091
Joined: 10/11/2005
Status: offline
First it was the use of certain aerosols, then the factories, then the vehicles... Now they want my steak?

http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2008/09/07-4 

quote:

 

People should have one meat-free day a week if they want to make a personal and effective sacrifice that would help tackle climate change, the world's leading authority on global warming has told The Observer

Dr Rajendra Pachauri, chair of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which last year earned a joint share of the Nobel Peace Prize, said that people should then go on to reduce their meat consumption even further.

Pachauri, who was re-elected the panel's chairman for a second six-year term last week, said diet change was important because of the huge greenhouse gas emissions and other environmental problems - including habitat destruction - associated with rearing cattle and other animals. It was relatively easy to change eating habits compared to changing means of transport, he said.


They can have my steak, when they pry the gun out of my cold (although allegedly warmer) dead hands.  I saw articles last year suggesting that a  "meat eater on a bike was more harmful to the Earth, than a vegan in a Hummer".  When will the fucking nonsense stop?  The UN has lost any credibility by selling out like they have and can kiss my American ass.

Well there is my rant.  What do you guys think about this one?

_____________________________

When the character of a man is not clear to you, look at his friends." ~ Japanese Proverb
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Global warming's slippery slope... - 9/13/2008 7:13:58 PM   
JohnWarren


Posts: 3807
Joined: 3/18/2005
From: Delray Beach, FL
Status: offline
"Global warming" has become a club for certain among the population to force their beliefs on the rest of us. 

We should just recognize that the Earth is a dynamic system and learn to live with it.  About a thousand years ago, they were growing grapes in what is now England and Greenland supported a healthly agrarian population. 

The world certainly hadn't ended, nor did it end when the mini-ice-age from which we are just now emerging replaced the global summer and half-froze Europe.

The changes aren't all bad.  An ice free arctic will be a boon to world maritime trade (of course the Panama Canal is doomed).  Warmer weather will open the Russian tundra and the Canadian forests to agriculture.  We will need more power but breeder reactors can step into the gap.  If things get too bad, we can build a bunch of high-sulfur-producing power plants and inject the smoke into the high atmosphere to act as a reflector.

Actually, I'm a lot more confident in the planet than I am in the human race.  I'm hoping Marching Morons will become a best seller.

< Message edited by JohnWarren -- 9/13/2008 7:15:03 PM >


_____________________________

www.lovingdominant.org

(in reply to Thadius)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Global warming's slippery slope... - 9/13/2008 7:16:00 PM   
slaveboyforyou


Posts: 3607
Joined: 1/6/2005
From: Arkansas, U.S.A.
Status: offline
What they want is the elimination of land ownership.  I am not a conspiracy theory nutter by any stretch of the imagination.  But the movement of alarmist, radical environmentalism shares a lot in common with Marxism. 

< Message edited by slaveboyforyou -- 9/13/2008 7:17:05 PM >

(in reply to Thadius)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Global warming's slippery slope... - 9/13/2008 7:18:23 PM   
Thadius


Posts: 5091
Joined: 10/11/2005
Status: offline
John,

Well said.  Glad to see you posting a bit more in your spare time, I do hope things are going well in all that you undertake.

Has that short story been reprinted or had the title hijacked?  Or were you referencing the origina?

_____________________________

When the character of a man is not clear to you, look at his friends." ~ Japanese Proverb

(in reply to JohnWarren)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Global warming's slippery slope... - 9/13/2008 7:20:24 PM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline
I am with you on this one. If someone does not want to eat meat, that's fine with me. Just don't mess with my menu.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to Thadius)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Global warming's slippery slope... - 9/13/2008 7:25:25 PM   
seababy


Posts: 845
Joined: 6/20/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Thadius

First it was the use of certain aerosols, then the factories, then the vehicles... Now they want my steak?

http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2008/09/07-4 

quote:

 

People should have one meat-free day a week if they want to make a personal and effective sacrifice that would help tackle climate change, the world's leading authority on global warming has told The Observer

Dr Rajendra Pachauri, chair of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which last year earned a joint share of the Nobel Peace Prize, said that people should then go on to reduce their meat consumption even further.

Pachauri, who was re-elected the panel's chairman for a second six-year term last week, said diet change was important because of the huge greenhouse gas emissions and other environmental problems - including habitat destruction - associated with rearing cattle and other animals. It was relatively easy to change eating habits compared to changing means of transport, he said.


They can have my steak, when they pry the gun out of my cold (although allegedly warmer) dead hands.  I saw articles last year suggesting that a  "meat eater on a bike was more harmful to the Earth, than a vegan in a Hummer".  When will the fucking nonsense stop?  The UN has lost any credibility by selling out like they have and can kiss my American ass.

Well there is my rant.  What do you guys think about this one?


*Hands Thadius a tofu burger*

:)

(in reply to Thadius)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Global warming's slippery slope... - 9/13/2008 7:28:32 PM   
Thadius


Posts: 5091
Joined: 10/11/2005
Status: offline
quote:

*Hands Thadius a tofu burger*


One should not hand me something that they are not afraid to have used on them.  I suppose a tofu burger would be a great tool to use as a gag, it is environmentally friendly (at least that is what I have been told).


_____________________________

When the character of a man is not clear to you, look at his friends." ~ Japanese Proverb

(in reply to seababy)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Global warming's slippery slope... - 9/13/2008 7:58:38 PM   
thornhappy


Posts: 8596
Joined: 12/16/2006
Status: offline
(fast reply)
A lot of the concerns are due to factory farming methods.  If we'd just settle for more expense, we'd decentralize the pork, cattle, chicken industries and feed them what they've evolved to eat, instead of food that makes them sick so that antibiotics are required.  You could have your food source closer to the customers, and do away with sewage ponds, etc.

It's been done in the past.  We could do it again.

thornhappy



(in reply to Thadius)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Global warming's slippery slope... - 9/13/2008 9:49:50 PM   
FangsNfeet


Posts: 3758
Joined: 12/3/2004
Status: offline
If it's the methane that cows produce which contributes to global warming, then shouldn't we just eat more cow to slow down the process?

_____________________________

I'm Godzilla and you're Japan

(in reply to Thadius)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Global warming's slippery slope... - 9/13/2008 10:25:18 PM   
Jeffff


Posts: 12600
Joined: 7/7/2007
Status: offline
In 1900 the deer population in the US was about 500,000.

Today it is about 30 million............... yet they aren't calling for more hunters....... interesting

Jeff

(in reply to Thadius)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Global warming's slippery slope... - 9/14/2008 12:55:27 AM   
Monkeyontuesday


Posts: 357
Joined: 2/29/2008
Status: offline
I don't particularly follow all of the "hot topics" of pop culture... But my favorite was that after Al Gore won the Nobel Prize for his little movie about global warming and all that business, he and his wife hopped a private jet to Scottsdale, AZ to join all of their closest friends in a private villa that had destroyed the environment in some way and dined on semi-endangered quail.. or something to that effect.

He was laughing all the way to the bank with that one.

_____________________________

Make no little plans. There is no magic in them to stir men's blood.

(in reply to Jeffff)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Global warming's slippery slope... - 9/14/2008 1:06:05 AM   
NihilusZero


Posts: 4036
Joined: 9/10/2008
From: Nashville, TN
Status: offline
I blame the volcanoes. It's all their fault. Bastards.

_____________________________

"I know it's all a game
I know they're all insane
I know it's all in vain
I know that I'm to blame."
~Siouxsie & the Banshees


NihilusZero.com

CM Sex God du Jour
CM Hall Monitor

(in reply to Monkeyontuesday)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Global warming's slippery slope... - 9/14/2008 4:22:48 AM   
Aneirin


Posts: 6121
Joined: 3/18/2006
From: Tamaris
Status: offline
I somehow get the impression that those that watch the enviroment think it should be a static enviroment, that this earth is just a rock that we all live on. No it is not a rock, but a living breathing eco system of it's own design and we are just another life form on it. We are no more important than a single celled amoeba, but we all take our place in the natural scheme of things. As has been demonstrated with life forms we have known about, life forms that have ceased to exist that natural life does have a use by date, and we are included in that shopping list, but we have been here only a short while in comparison to other creatures, so might have some time left yet.

Maybe the survival of nature's lifeforms is all dictated by how well that lifeform adapts to changes in enviroment and as our enviroment changes, we must adapt to that change, allow change to happen, and work with it, not try to stop it, for it might be the key to our survival.

So, the artic ice is melting, and at a far greater rate than what 'scientists' think should be right, but who says 'scientists' have got it right, sure they have researched, but in that research there are times when change was fast and change was slow, it is just we only seem to get to hear about what can be used to politically control.

But perhaps we should be looking elsewhere for a cause of change, interesting that the Martian ice caps are melting too and as far as science is concerned, there is no devasting life forms on that planet. The common factor there, is the sun, a ball of burning gas we really do not know enough about to make judgements.

But the long and the short of it, change happens and we must adapt to survive, the politicians, well anyone in fact that seeks funding by control does have a vested interest in the scares they create, it is just for us, to be aware and not take their word as gospel truth, but demand the full facts before any thinking may be done.

But why the need for thinking to be done, we cannot halt the changes in our natural enviroment, a force far stronger than us controls that action. Sure we can do something about our own pollution, we can and should, clean up our own mess after us, but in the greater scheme of things, besides scare stories ,really, we have no control.

A random thought maybe, maybe we evolved as an intelligent life form to cause change ourselves and there learn to adapt to that change ?

Cow farts = politics = control = wealth for those that learn how to control us and our wealth.


_____________________________

Everything we are is the result of what we have thought, the mind is everything, what we think, we become - Guatama Buddha

Conservatism is distrust of people tempered by fear - William Gladstone

(in reply to NihilusZero)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Global warming's slippery slope... - 9/14/2008 4:33:23 AM   
Aileen1968


Posts: 6062
Joined: 12/12/2007
From: I miss Shore, New Jersey
Status: offline
I would think we should eat less beans.  That should lower gas emissions. 

_____________________________



(in reply to Thadius)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Global warming's slippery slope... - 9/14/2008 5:07:56 AM   
patwi


Posts: 296
Joined: 6/24/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thornhappy

(fast reply)
A lot of the concerns are due to factory farming methods.  If we'd just settle for more expense, we'd decentralize the pork, cattle, chicken industries and feed them what they've evolved to eat, instead of food that makes them sick so that antibiotics are required.  You could have your food source closer to the customers, and do away with sewage ponds, etc.

It's been done in the past.  We could do it again.

thornhappy





I think you have the right idea here. It isn't nessesarily the act of cattle farming itself, it's the massive amount of resources and the execution used by huge factory farming operations that throw a wrench into things. Not only does that do damage environmentally, but those animals are treated horrendously. And while yes, I realise they are being raised for food, that doesn't in my mind justify lifelong cruelty. And make no mistake, it's pretty cruel. A great book to read on this is "Fast Food Nation." It sheds some light on how big an impact those factories have not only on the earth environment as we think of it, but also the towns and cities they occupy.

That said - I love a good steak. Man, do I love a good pink in the middle, juicy steak (no jokes here, you dirty minded people.) I haven't quit eating meat, not at all. WHat i've done instead is sought out my local farmers market and found local naturally raised beef to buy. Less fuel used for transport by buying local good, etc. etc., raised humanely and naturally - no funky hormones or extra antibiotics. Just cows growing and living like real cows.

Until they hit my dinner plate. I can live with that.

(edited for spelling. pre-coffee.)


< Message edited by patwi -- 9/14/2008 5:08:57 AM >

(in reply to thornhappy)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Global warming's slippery slope... - 9/14/2008 6:50:45 AM   
Aneirin


Posts: 6121
Joined: 3/18/2006
From: Tamaris
Status: offline
I love a good steak, cooked rare with garlic and black pepper, but that to me is an occaisional luxury, as low income living forbids it on a daily or even weekly basis. I could get steak, from the local supermarket, but my rule is only organic, so I save steak for a time I want to treat myself.

It is interesting to notice that less well off people are often the unhealthiest, why, well, the foods that less well off people can afford to buy are often those chemical, water and sugar laden foods, meat, if they eat meat, laden with rapid growth hormones.Our industry and need for profit is causing our unhealth.

In the past, I don't suppose meat was in such rich supply, perhaps we don't need to eat meat on a daily basis, I certainly don't.


_____________________________

Everything we are is the result of what we have thought, the mind is everything, what we think, we become - Guatama Buddha

Conservatism is distrust of people tempered by fear - William Gladstone

(in reply to patwi)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Global warming's slippery slope... - 9/14/2008 7:03:42 AM   
patwi


Posts: 296
Joined: 6/24/2007
Status: offline
I think you're right. I don't often eat beef these days, or much meat at all for that matter. When I do, it's the good stuff. The naturally raised/humane/organic/local stuff. And man I tell you - I appreciate the taste so much more. 

(in reply to Aneirin)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Global warming's slippery slope... - 9/14/2008 8:21:51 AM   
Raechard


Posts: 3513
Joined: 3/10/2007
From: S.E. London U.K.
Status: offline
 

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aneirin
Maybe the survival of nature's lifeforms is all dictated by how well that lifeform adapts to changes in enviroment and as our enviroment changes, we must adapt to that change, allow change to happen, and work with it, not try to stop it, for it might be the key to our survival.

Some people are not in an economic position to change and will die or lose their homes on pacific islands because people in a land far away were ignorant of the effect they were having on the world. There is no justice in survival of the fittest is there?
quote:


So, the artic ice is melting, and at a far greater rate than what 'scientists' think should be right, but who says 'scientists' have got it right, sure they have researched, but in that research there are times when change was fast and change was slow, it is just we only seem to get to hear about what can be used to politically control.

The ice caps exist largely due to the fact the brilliant white surface reflect sun rays back into space. As ice melts dark patches become apparent and this leads to more heat being absorbed, therefore this melting is happening at an exponential rate. From satellite photos taken over time we can see year on year the dark regions becoming more and more extensive. In a perfectly balanced system the ice levels would remain the same each year as any reduction isn't going to be made up for next year. The thing that protects the ice is the very existence of the ice and once all gone there is no way to get it back other than to have toxic gasses in the upper levels of the atmosphere to block out the solar rays. This is the natural cycle and one that we will be unable to adapt to survive to. The oceans will be unable to absorb this toxic atmosphere because the ocean currents will not be evenly distributing it due to the fact there will be an insignificant temperature difference between the equator and the poles to cause these convection currents, if only we still had some ice there to cool the ocean in that region. Also if we have no sea currents we have no distribution of food for marine life. When you consider the amount we depend on sea life for our existence this is all very bleak indeed. Maybe we'll be able to eat plants until those toxic gasses we are counting on to restore the ice caps build up to the extent that they block the ability of plants to photosynthesise, the plants will survive for a while through switching to respiration and emitting more co2. Everything seems to be swinging against our survival at this point.
quote:


But perhaps we should be looking elsewhere for a cause of change, interesting that the Martian ice caps are melting too and as far as science is concerned, there is no devasting life forms on that planet. The common factor there, is the sun, a ball of burning gas we really do not know enough about to make judgements.

Mars is 141.5 million miles from the sun but earth is only 93 million miles from the sun
Mars takes 24.5 hours to revolve and the earth takes 23.9 hours
Mars takes 686.98 days to circle the sun but the Earth only takes 365.26 days
Mars has a equatorial diameter of  4200 miles and the earth’s equatorial diameter is 7926 miles
The atmospheric pressure range of mars is 30-1155 Pa and an average surface pressure of 600 Pa compared to the Earth’s 103 Pa
The makeup of the atmospheres of Earth and Mars are different.
Do you really want to compare apples and oranges? To build up a climate change model for Earth is hard enough but now you want to study Mars in comparison where we have sketchy weather information compared with the climate information we have for earth.
quote:


But the long and the short of it, change happens and we must adapt to survive, the politicians, well anyone in fact that seeks funding by control does have a vested interest in the scares they create, it is just for us, to be aware and not take their word as gospel truth, but demand the full facts before any thinking may be done.

The only people controlling anything are the oil companies that lobby government whenever government proposes taxes that will force people and car manufacturers to produce cleaner technology. No climate change scientist is making obscene amounts of money by opposing the status quo as far as I can see.
quote:


But why the need for thinking to be done, we cannot halt the changes in our natural enviroment, a force far stronger than us controls that action. Sure we can do something about our own pollution, we can and should, clean up our own mess after us, but in the greater scheme of things, besides scare stories ,really, we have no control.

We can't put off natural change but there is a difference between natural change and change caused by man. People will always argue man isn't causing change, that it is all down to nature. All they really have to do is ask themselves what if these people are right about their logical arguments? Surely putting off something disastrous by a few thousand years for the chance of a thousand more years of evolution and a thousand more years of better answers is worth considering for a rather small sacrifice?
quote:


A random thought maybe, maybe we evolved as an intelligent life form to cause change ourselves and there learn to adapt to that change ?
Cow farts = politics = control = wealth for those that learn how to control us and our wealth.

We are far from intelligent in the way we use resources. We should be learning that we aren’t going to evolve overnight into a creature that can breathe under water, filter toxic gasses or find sustenance from a lifeless sea.

< Message edited by Raechard -- 9/14/2008 8:58:47 AM >


_____________________________

えへまにんへえや
Nobody wants to listen to the same song over and over again!

(in reply to Aneirin)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: Global warming's slippery slope... - 9/14/2008 9:00:07 AM   
bipolarber


Posts: 2792
Joined: 9/25/2004
Status: offline
The problem isn't the cows, anyway. The problem is that we have 6 billion people on this planet, and the systems of agriculture and waste disposal that we have are creaking under the strain of us all. But I wouldn't worry about it. Nature tends to have systems for correcting an overpopulation of one animal population or another. So far, we've been clever enough to still continue our unchecked growth... but it seems that now mother nature is upping the stakes.

I have faith in the human animal that it is stupid enough to not do anything until it's too late, and nature will handle the problem for us. Wars, famine, disease... all will combine to take us down a few pegs. Maybe after it gets ugly for those who survive, things will come back... only a little saner.


(in reply to Raechard)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: Global warming's slippery slope... - 9/14/2008 9:08:12 AM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Thadius

First it was the use of certain aerosols, then the factories, then the vehicles... Now they want my steak?

http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2008/09/07-4 

quote:

 

People should have one meat-free day a week if they want to make a personal and effective sacrifice that would help tackle climate change, the world's leading authority on global warming has told The Observer

Dr Rajendra Pachauri, chair of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which last year earned a joint share of the Nobel Peace Prize, said that people should then go on to reduce their meat consumption even further.

Pachauri, who was re-elected the panel's chairman for a second six-year term last week, said diet change was important because of the huge greenhouse gas emissions and other environmental problems - including habitat destruction - associated with rearing cattle and other animals. It was relatively easy to change eating habits compared to changing means of transport, he said.


They can have my steak, when they pry the gun out of my cold (although allegedly warmer) dead hands.  I saw articles last year suggesting that a  "meat eater on a bike was more harmful to the Earth, than a vegan in a Hummer".  When will the fucking nonsense stop?  The UN has lost any credibility by selling out like they have and can kiss my American ass.

Well there is my rant.  What do you guys think about this one?


The reason for steak being a problem is the expansion of cattle farming. When Bison ran the range in N America they only produced a fraction of the methane cattle produce. Same with the expansion of cattle rearing elsewhere. Like most agriculture, there is always a down side which is why there needs to be balances built into the system but modern industrial farming has had no need to heed them. This is only about putting the balances back in place. With farming expanding in Brazil and the rain forest being hacked down, the future for farming for N. America doesn't look that bright because scientists say the evidence is beginning to back the theory that the Amazon rain forest provides the rain fall for N.America.

Anyway, we won't destroy the planet, though we might bring down our civilization but it won't be the first time humans have destroyed their civilization through over harvesting their environment, it seems to be a human flaw. The idea technology will get us out of the problem is pie in the sky without a change of attitude towards our environemnt. Most grand technological plans have been thoroughly ridiculed, we need technology that works with the environment not that works against it.

< Message edited by meatcleaver -- 9/14/2008 9:09:29 AM >


_____________________________

There are fascists who consider themselves humanitarians, like cannibals on a health kick, eating only vegetarians.

(in reply to Thadius)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> Global warming's slippery slope... Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094