Mercnbeth
Posts: 11766
Status: offline
|
BP, I'll take the easiest question first... quote:
Are you better off now, than you were then? YES! - Unqualified. Not because of what the Government has done to me, (President and/or Congress) but in spite of their best efforts. quote:
Well, okay Merc, but how about we get even a little more fundamental? How about we don't vote for political parties who, (in the words of our "fearless leader") "got drunk" with extending credit to bad risks. It was the Bush plan for an "ownership society" in his first term that deregulated the lending industry which directly led us to this sad state of affairs. First you have to start on the foundation of accuracy; the US Government didn't use tax money "extending credit to bad risks", they spent money trying to insulate those making those decisions (Corporate and Personal) who made them. Starting from there the answer is obvious and as I've been saying - LET THEM FAIL! quote:
Can you, or the US, really afford another 4 years of John "I really don't understand the economy" McSame? As you know, I will NOT be voting for Senator McCain. My question to you is, who can stand behind a political party that gives this as a key point of their election platform: “We will provide immediate relief to working people who have lost their jobs, families who have lost their homes and people who have lost their way.” (Everyone should read that article) The fact that this came to my attention as an Op-Ed piece coming from the Democratic Party's press liaison, the NY Times, and even they deemed it irresponsible; speaks to me how dangerous it would be for this country to have to endure an Obama Presidency. The Times tried to 'spin' it to be directed to the people criminally taking jobs and benefits from US citizens by entering and living in this country illegally, but that wasn't stipulated by the platform committee. It detracts from the general representation that the acceptable meaning behind 'Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness' now is being interpreted as a right of happiness and the insulation of failure; but the concept behind the "lost their way" part should disturb just about everyone. I mean really; aid to anyone who has "lost their way"?! Is the application for aid; "Do you feel lost?" If so - how much money should the Government provide you to find yourself?" I'm a big time advocate for self awareness; but I can't get behind a program of government grants to facilitate the process. Do you? This has been to date kept under wraps, but I haven't lived under the support of a 'care-taker' since I was 17, and have no desire to do so at 50.
|