LadyLou -> RE: Do dominant women sometimes like resistant/hard to break men? (9/18/2008 5:16:22 AM)
|
I think you are confusing ‘submissive’ with ‘doormat’, and from my perspective, you seem to be confusing submission with kink. It's cool to solely turned on by a physical/mental struggle in a scene, but have no inclination towards lifestyle type submission. Those “100%” you mention, are for the most part horny dudes just looking to get off with anything that resembles female. They are not selective, and will seemingly roll over for anyone who asks, and more often than not before anyone asks… whether they have an audience or not. Whilst they are ubiquitous, they are not representative of the better class of male submissive. I suspect these ’horny dudes’ is the instant no-questions-asked submission you are observing. No, I am personally not interested in anyone who is ‘hard to break’, and at the same time, I wouldn’t be interested in a man who just rolls over for anyone. I am interested in men who are selective and discerning in their submission. They submit to me, because they choose too, and for reasons that go beyond just being horny. They submit after trust has built, and when the more intimate kind chemistry, that can only be built up over time, is right . To me, this is a natural, organic type process. Any man who plays ‘hard to break’ would loose my interest very quickly. Not only is it manipulative, but goes against what I consider a natural process in the kind of men I enjoy. To me, ‘hard to break‘, shows no desire for me, it shows that he doesn‘t want to be with me, it shows he has no respect for me, not to mention that fact it shows he is more work than he is worth. I know some women go for that kind of thing, but they are the ones you hear moaning and seeking sympathy at the office coffee machine about how her man don’t treat her right blah blah blah with genuine self pity and a total lack of understanding. If I enjoyed men that are hard to break, I spend more time with my cat!
|
|
|
|