kidwithknife -> RE: Male Dominants? (9/18/2008 7:09:22 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Steponme73 I agree that "all" is probably a bad term. However, there seems to be more men who have ego problems or bullying problems then women. I am sure there are some well rounded male doms. It just seems like the majority of them I have come across as more bullies than doms. I have an Alpha personality and maybe that is part of the problem too. Just thought I would throw this out and see what everyone thinks. That's a very large proportion of it I think. Because what we're talking about is guys who desperately want to be Alphas. But, in the privacy of their own thoughts, they don't believe that they are. So they bluster and bully. Because the next best thing would be to be considered Alphas by observers. Despite their behaviour being remarkably transparent. It's like just before a fight breaks out. Ignore the guy shouting his mouth off and beating his chest. Look for the one casually observing the scene, with an air of studied disinterest. It's the latter who's genuinely dangerous. And if someone's basing their justification on why they should be subbed to on their self-identification as a dominant, as opposed to their dominance, anything that so much as looks like it could threaten that is going to be met with hostility. We're talking about very brittle egos indeed. Obviously, this makes it no less annoying for you, but their behaviour is coming from a position of weakness, not strength. And the kind of male dom in question does appear to me to have a particular problem with female doms. I suspect it's because they can at least identify to an extent with other male doms, so we feel like less of an obvious threat. In my view, this is at the centre of all the 'women can't really be doms' wittering. However, I did give a twinge of recognition to MadRabbit's comments on intellectual arrogance. And the intellectually arrogant have generally more complex, varied and subtler ways of trying to establish our status. Even what I just did, deliberately bringing up an issue so I could be the one controling its presentation, is a textbook tactic. It's up there with the ironic smirk as a primary weapon in the intellectually arrogant's arsenal. So you should probably take everything I've said with a certain degree of cynicism.
|
|
|
|