djaleksandr
Posts: 203
Joined: 3/10/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
My point is (and I wish I had the tools to more clearly describe the concept), that we men (well, at least I, man) all have the innate XY ability, the compelling masculine desire, the driving muscular passion, the underlying sexual need, the overwhelming carnal desire to forcefully grab the very next pretty woman who excites us, willingly or not on her part, it matters not (in our dreams) ... and have her ... hold her ... own her... "do" her ... specifically to "sperm" her, to inseminate her, to drive our genetic material deeply into her, to leave our unique genetic mark more deeply than any other man can ... anywhere we can, whether it be literally on her person (witness the sensual attraction to pearl necklaces), in her mouth ('swallow this!'), or inside her rectum ('spread 'em wide baby). I do not believe in "innate XY" or "innate XX" or "innate XO" (etc) anything, save for, in most cases, a kind of uniformity in physical sex characteristics -- vagina or penis, ovaries or testes, etc (though in some cases it works in different ways). Are "masculine" traits (as describe: muscular need to inseminate, to possess) really "innate" to the "Y"? What about a man with "XX", an FtM? Are they, the transexual man, not masculine? Is it inherently masculine to possess? To leave some kind of mark? What of the man (XY, XX, or otherwise) who has rape fantasies, not of being the rapist, but the victim? And what of the woman (XX, XY, or otherwise) who fantasizes about being the rapist? I think the rape fantasy is based on a LOT of things, both personal and cultural, and that it is different for each individual, and each culture. I think it is dangerous, and limiting, to delineate all of that to something as shaky as biological determinism.
_____________________________
'is simplicity best, or simply the easiest? the narrowest path is always the holiest. so walk on barefoot for me, suffer some misery, if you want my love.' [ depechemode judas ]
|