celticlord2112
Posts: 5732
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: slvemike4u Well CL your question would have some intellectual honesty if Franks and Pelosi operated in a vacuum,but they don't so your question is irrelevant.One can not look at this without looking at the roles played by the others. So I invite you to reread the tread the answers,those taking into account reality are there,if you insist on one based solely on your limited parameters,you will have to supply it yourself. Fortunately, the answer is supplied by the players themselves: quote:
"The legislation may have failed; the crisis is still with us," said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., in a news conference after the defeat. "What happened today cannot stand." quote:
"What happened today was not a failure of a bill, it was a failure of will," said Dodd, the Banking Committee chairman. "Our hope is that cooler heads will prevail, people will think about what they did today and recognize that this is not just scare tactics — it's reality." The Congressional leaders of the Democratic Party are taking a stance that they wanted this bill to pass. They did not get what they wanted. Whether this was a good bill or no, the inability of the Democratic leadership to manuever legislation through Congress to address what many would believe is an immediate crisis is telling. If Nancy Pelosi disliked the bill, she could have used an endless array of procedural manuevers to keep the legislation from coming for a floor vote--much as she did with oil drilling initiatives prior to Congress' August recess. If she was opposed to the bill she had the power as Speaker of the House to smother the bill--maneuvering favored legislation through the House of Representatives is what Speakers have been doing since 1789. If Nancy Pelosi liked the bill, she erred by rushing the bill to the floor before securing sufficient votes to assure it's passage. This too is something Speakers and committee chairmen have done since 1789. That is the structure and the culture of the House of Representatives. I personally do not know if the bailout bill was good or bad. What I do know is that Nancy Pelosi did not shepherd the bill half as well as she might have. Would the bill have passed had Nancy Pelosi held the bill up 24 hours in order to secure 12 more "yea" votes--would those votes have been obtained, whether by her or by John McCain or President Bush? There is no way to know. This bill was rushed to the floor. The only person who could rush a bill to the floor is Nancy Pelosi. Not President Bush, not Senator McCain, not Treasury Secretary Paulson....only Nancy Pelosi. And that's not spin. That is fact.
< Message edited by celticlord2112 -- 9/29/2008 7:16:55 PM >
_____________________________
|