Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Time to Thank 2004 Bush Voters


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> Time to Thank 2004 Bush Voters Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Time to Thank 2004 Bush Voters - 9/29/2008 10:26:13 PM   
cloudboy


Posts: 7306
Joined: 12/14/2005
Status: offline
>Duke University finance Prof. Campbell Harvey predicts there could be 750 to 1,000 bank failures over the next six months because of billions in bad assets stemming from the housing meltdown.<

I would like to thank all you BUSH voters for keeping him in office, otherwise he could not have brought his disastrous touch abroad back home. First he wrecked a sovereign nation from without, now he might bring another to its knees from within.

His tax cuts gave us $2 Trillion in new debt. Now his domestic policy might ruin our economy for the next decade.

But at least you'll have Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, the NRA, family values, the Christian Coalition, and the Creationists to fall back on.

Keeping him those extra four years undoubtably may win him the top spot as the WORST PRESIDENT ever.

Newsflash: McCain has sided with BUSH 91% of the time.





< Message edited by cloudboy -- 9/29/2008 10:27:06 PM >
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Time to Thank 2004 Bush Voters - 9/29/2008 10:29:39 PM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline
       '04 was the Democrats election to lose as well.  Thank yourselves.

_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to cloudboy)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Time to Thank 2004 Bush Voters - 9/29/2008 10:35:29 PM   
cloudboy


Posts: 7306
Joined: 12/14/2005
Status: offline

The electorate put Bush back in office in 2004. They get the credit. The electoral college gets credit for 2000.

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Time to Thank 2004 Bush Voters - 9/29/2008 10:48:56 PM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline
        Right.  And the Democrats gave them what to choose from?

      How many votes did Kerry cost himself right here?

_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to cloudboy)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Time to Thank 2004 Bush Voters - 9/29/2008 11:07:41 PM   
TabrisMaceth


Posts: 190
Joined: 9/23/2008
From: The Ghost Matrix
Status: offline
Hey, Kerry's stoned. Cool.

-Tabris

_____________________________

I don't like hand baskets. Everything's always going to Hell in them.

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Time to Thank 2004 Bush Voters - 9/29/2008 11:14:40 PM   
JerryFrankster


Posts: 188
Joined: 2/15/2008
Status: offline
I hope you're not trying to blame bush for the housing meltdown. If so, I'd like to see you back it up.

What percentage of the time would a good politician vote against Bush? Can you just toss a coin and vote against him 50% of the time and get better results?


_____________________________

Prosecutors will be Transgressicuted!

(in reply to cloudboy)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Time to Thank 2004 Bush Voters - 9/29/2008 11:25:37 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JerryFrankster

I hope you're not trying to blame bush for the housing meltdown. If so, I'd like to see you back it up.

What percentage of the time would a good politician vote against Bush? Can you just toss a coin and vote against him 50% of the time and get better results?


A simple policy that has served me my entire adult life, if the majority of Republicans are for something it will cause me harm somehow someway. OTOH if the majority of Democrats support something it will be something that improves my situation. This has worked in all cases without fail.

(in reply to JerryFrankster)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Time to Thank 2004 Bush Voters - 9/30/2008 12:06:00 AM   
untndedrosegardn


Posts: 41
Joined: 12/31/2004
Status: offline
Wasnt it in Clinton's administration that the lending industry was basically ordered to make loans available to more people (trying to be as PC as possible) who would have otherwise been considered a bad risk, threatening the mortgage and finance industry with fines and sanctions if they didnt?
http://www.amazon.com/tag/politics/forum?_encoding=UTF8&cdForum=Fx1S3QSZRUL93V8&cdThread=Tx3JQJ161HMTA1N

And didnt a good portion of the country do it to themselves? Refinancing when markets were already down low, borrowing what they knew they couldnt afford, defaulting on loans and mortgages.  People can try to lay the blame on whatever powers that me are in or trying to get in office. Whatever happened to some good old fashion accountability.
Oh yea..... thats not in the democratic theory is it? Bigger goverment, more programs, more entitlements...  lets just hold everyone's hand and not force them to be accountable.

What ever happened to the adage,"Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day; teach him to fish and he will eat for a lifetime". 

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Time to Thank 2004 Bush Voters - 9/30/2008 12:48:01 AM   
ThatDaveGuy69


Posts: 978
Joined: 6/22/2007
Status: offline
rosegarden:
You left off the ending, which sums up the probelms in this country:

teach him to create an artificial shortage in the fish market and he will eat steak.

It's all about greed and not being satisfied with what you have.

~Dave

(in reply to untndedrosegardn)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Time to Thank 2004 Bush Voters - 9/30/2008 12:49:51 AM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: untndedrosegardn

Wasnt it in Clinton's administration that the lending industry was basically ordered to make loans available to more people (trying to be as PC as possible) who would have otherwise been considered a bad risk, threatening the mortgage and finance industry with fines and sanctions if they didnt?
http://www.amazon.com/tag/politics/forum?_encoding=UTF8&cdForum=Fx1S3QSZRUL93V8&cdThread=Tx3JQJ161HMTA1N

And didnt a good portion of the country do it to themselves? Refinancing when markets were already down low, borrowing what they knew they couldnt afford, defaulting on loans and mortgages.  People can try to lay the blame on whatever powers that me are in or trying to get in office. Whatever happened to some good old fashion accountability.
Oh yea..... thats not in the democratic theory is it? Bigger goverment, more programs, more entitlements...  lets just hold everyone's hand and not force them to be accountable.

What ever happened to the adage,"Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day; teach him to fish and he will eat for a lifetime". 



So 8 years wasn't enough time for Bush to implement his own policies?

Always hilarious to listen to Republican logic.  Clinton wasn't responsible for the economic success during his Presidency.  It actually was the Republican Congress who should be credited.  Now that we have an economic meltdown after Republican control of the White House and Congress for most of the last 8 years it's really not the fault of Bush or the Republicans. 

Sure, I can see that.  It really is all Clinton's fault.

 

< Message edited by rulemylife -- 9/30/2008 12:51:27 AM >

(in reply to untndedrosegardn)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Time to Thank 2004 Bush Voters - 9/30/2008 12:55:47 AM   
untndedrosegardn


Posts: 41
Joined: 12/31/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife


So 8 years wasn't enough time for Bush to implement his own policies?

Always hilarious to listen to Republican logic.  Clinton wasn't responsible for the economic success during his Presidency.  It actually was the Republican Congress who should be credited.  Now that we have an economic meltdown after Republican control of the White House and Congress for most of the last 8 years it's really not the fault of Bush or the Republicans. 

Sure, I can see that.  It really is all Clinton's fault.

 


I dont recall saying it was all Clinton's fault.  I said that's where it started. I also said that many Americans got themselves into the mess. I find it amusing that you make ASSumptions of one's political stance so easily. 
Or am I required to want freebies and handouts to be a Democrat? If so, I guess I need to turn in my registration card.
I guess I missed the fine print that says I have to agree with everything the party does to be a member.

< Message edited by untndedrosegardn -- 9/30/2008 1:00:21 AM >

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Time to Thank 2004 Bush Voters - 9/30/2008 2:41:42 AM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: untndedrosegardn

I dont recall saying it was all Clinton's fault.  I said that's where it started. I also said that many Americans got themselves into the mess. I find it amusing that you make ASSumptions of one's political stance so easily. 
Or am I required to want freebies and handouts to be a Democrat? If so, I guess I need to turn in my registration card.
I guess I missed the fine print that says I have to agree with everything the party does to be a member.



Well, I don't know.  Let me think.
Oh yeah, now I remember. 

I guess it was where you said this:

"Wasnt it in Clinton's administration that the lending industry was basically ordered to make loans available to more people (trying to be as PC as possible) who would have otherwise been considered a bad risk, threatening the mortgage and finance industry with fines and sanctions if they didnt?"

How silly of me to assume you were trying to imply he was at fault. 


 

(in reply to untndedrosegardn)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Time to Thank 2004 Bush Voters - 9/30/2008 4:25:36 AM   
LaTigresse


Posts: 26123
Joined: 1/15/2006
Status: offline
That's okay, I think that there is a high probability that many of the putzs that voted Bush into office also lost ALOT of money yesterday.

Retribution.

_____________________________

My twisted, self deprecating, sense of humour, finds alot to laugh about, in your lack of one!

Just because you are well educated, articulate, and can use big, fancy words, properly........does not mean you are right!

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Time to Thank 2004 Bush Voters - 9/30/2008 4:34:44 AM   
SilverMark


Posts: 3457
Joined: 5/9/2007
Status: offline
In '04 we as a nation were in the middle of an armed conflict and the last time a President was voted out in the middle of an armed conflict was?....Hmmmmm....
It wasn't the Democrats election to lose and had Kerry won it would have been an amazing feat.
No, he didn't help himself but the politics of Rove and company did a wonderful job of killing his chances... Rove for his faults and believe me, I have no love for the guy is a marvelous political strategist as far as stretching and mis-stating and Winning!....I think he is detetable but smart at playing on the edges.

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Time to Thank 2004 Bush Voters - 9/30/2008 4:41:19 AM   
MzMia


Posts: 5333
Joined: 7/30/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: untndedrosegardn

Wasnt it in Clinton's administration that the lending industry was basically ordered to make loans available to more people (trying to be as PC as possible) who would have otherwise been considered a bad risk, threatening the mortgage and finance industry with fines and sanctions if they didnt?
http://www.amazon.com/tag/politics/forum?_encoding=UTF8&cdForum=Fx1S3QSZRUL93V8&cdThread=Tx3JQJ161HMTA1N

And didnt a good portion of the country do it to themselves? Refinancing when markets were already down low, borrowing what they knew they couldnt afford, defaulting on loans and mortgages.  People can try to lay the blame on whatever powers that me are in or trying to get in office. Whatever happened to some good old fashion accountability.
Oh yea..... thats not in the democratic theory is it? Bigger goverment, more programs, more entitlements...  lets just hold everyone's hand and not force them to be accountable.

What ever happened to the adage,"Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day; teach him to fish and he will eat for a lifetime". 



So 8 years wasn't enough time for Bush to implement his own policies?

Always hilarious to listen to Republican logic.  Clinton wasn't responsible for the economic success during his Presidency.  It actually was the Republican Congress who should be credited.  Now that we have an economic meltdown after Republican control of the White House and Congress for most of the last 8 years it's really not the fault of Bush or the Republicans. 

Sure, I can see that.  It really is all Clinton's fault.

 



You are on the mark here.
The Republicans will NOT take the blame for their 8 years of failed policies.
Everything is Clinton's fault!
They could do nothing to build up or repair anything in 8 years!
Now they want 4 more years to continue to do NOTHING to build up our country?

Shame on the current Administration for not taking the blame on anything.
Has anyone SEEN President Bush lately?
He might as well resign, he is looking worse every day.


If Senator Obama made half the mistakes of George W. Bush, he would be RUN out of town.
I want President Bush's 8 years of failed policies written down.
Don't you DARE judge Senator Obama as a President harsher than you judged George Bush!
Because President Bush will go down in history as one of the worse Presidents in US history.

 
The next President is stepping into a country that has been literally run into the fucking ground.
It will take at least 4-8 years to start to dig out of the crap hole President Bush has left this country sitting in!

< Message edited by MzMia -- 9/30/2008 4:46:08 AM >


_____________________________

Namaste'
To Each His/Her Own
"DENIAL ain't just a river in Egypt." Mark Twain


What's your favorite fetish?
"My partner's whisper"--bloomswell

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Time to Thank 2004 Bush Voters - 9/30/2008 4:41:35 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
Dude!   We have not had a terrorist attack.


We are "safe".   2004 was all about terrorism.

(in reply to SilverMark)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Time to Thank 2004 Bush Voters - 9/30/2008 4:45:13 AM   
LaTigresse


Posts: 26123
Joined: 1/15/2006
Status: offline
Oh yeahhhhhhhhh, I am feeling REALLY safe now. NOT!

_____________________________

My twisted, self deprecating, sense of humour, finds alot to laugh about, in your lack of one!

Just because you are well educated, articulate, and can use big, fancy words, properly........does not mean you are right!

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Time to Thank 2004 Bush Voters - 9/30/2008 4:49:19 AM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline
Yea, It's just too bad that the democrats didn't give us somebody worth voting for. If they had, maybe things would have been different.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to cloudboy)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: Time to Thank 2004 Bush Voters - 9/30/2008 5:32:44 AM   
kittinSol


Posts: 16926
Status: offline
Kerry would have made a perfectly decent president. His presidency wouldn't have ended in the debacle and embarrassment that is accompanying Bush's, for sure. The man has balls, and he has class, he didn't dodge going to Vietnam, and he speaks foreign languages. Maybe that's why more people didn't vote for him.

_____________________________



(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: Time to Thank 2004 Bush Voters - 9/30/2008 5:39:34 AM   
Aynne88


Posts: 3873
Joined: 8/29/2008
Status: offline
MzMia,

YOU ROCK!!!!!

quote:

ORIGINAL: MzMia

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: untndedrosegardn

Wasnt it in Clinton's administration that the lending industry was basically ordered to make loans available to more people (trying to be as PC as possible) who would have otherwise been considered a bad risk, threatening the mortgage and finance industry with fines and sanctions if they didnt?
http://www.amazon.com/tag/politics/forum?_encoding=UTF8&cdForum=Fx1S3QSZRUL93V8&cdThread=Tx3JQJ161HMTA1N

And didnt a good portion of the country do it to themselves? Refinancing when markets were already down low, borrowing what they knew they couldnt afford, defaulting on loans and mortgages.  People can try to lay the blame on whatever powers that me are in or trying to get in office. Whatever happened to some good old fashion accountability.
Oh yea..... thats not in the democratic theory is it? Bigger goverment, more programs, more entitlements...  lets just hold everyone's hand and not force them to be accountable.

What ever happened to the adage,"Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day; teach him to fish and he will eat for a lifetime". 



So 8 years wasn't enough time for Bush to implement his own policies?

Always hilarious to listen to Republican logic.  Clinton wasn't responsible for the economic success during his Presidency.  It actually was the Republican Congress who should be credited.  Now that we have an economic meltdown after Republican control of the White House and Congress for most of the last 8 years it's really not the fault of Bush or the Republicans. 

Sure, I can see that.  It really is all Clinton's fault.

 



You are on the mark here.
The Republicans will NOT take the blame for their 8 years of failed policies.
Everything is Clinton's fault!
They could do nothing to build up or repair anything in 8 years!
Now they want 4 more years to continue to do NOTHING to build up our country?

Shame on the current Administration for not taking the blame on anything.
Has anyone SEEN President Bush lately?
He might as well resign, he is looking worse every day.


If Senator Obama made half the mistakes of George W. Bush, he would be RUN out of town.
I want President Bush's 8 years of failed policies written down.
Don't you DARE judge Senator Obama as a President harsher than you judged George Bush!
Because President Bush will go down in history as one of the worse Presidents in US history.

 
The next President is stepping into a country that has been literally run into the fucking ground.
It will take at least 4-8 years to start to dig out of the crap hole President Bush has left this country sitting in!


_____________________________

As long as people will shed the blood of innocent creatures there can be no peace, no liberty, no harmony between people. Slaughter and justice cannot dwell together.
—Isaac Bashevis Singer, writer and Nobel laureate (1902–1991)



(in reply to MzMia)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> Time to Thank 2004 Bush Voters Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094