DesertRat -> RE: Alternative bike styles (12/4/2005 1:09:18 PM)
|
I've never ridden a recumbent, but have been on lots of long tours where I've seen recumbent riders struggling on long hills. In my view, if they are less efficient (or effective, which is not the same thing) on hills, then they must be less efficient in all circumstances and hillclimbing just accentuates that. On flat terrain they should have an aerodynamic advantage, though. The idea that someone is more comfy in a chairlike position is something you see expressed a lot in motorcycle circles. With or without a motor, I have always found it more comfortable to be in a forward-leaning stance, with a considerable portion of my weight supported by my arms and shoulders. The upright and forward position also allows instantaneous shifts of weight and, therefore, balance. It's active, rather than passive. Orthopedically, I think that's better. Gotta watch out for numbness of the crotch, though. Sounds funny, but it's not. Bob ps: I ride an old (but beautiful) Trek TX900. All Columbus/Campy/Cinelli. The bike and my riding gear all look like something pulled out of a time capsule. It's even a TEN-speed. LOL
|
|
|
|