Missokyst -> RE: Losing symbolism/meaning (10/2/2008 8:44:54 PM)
|
I kind of have a different view because I have been doing this a while. I was submissive to my mate in a relationship because that is just the way things worked. When Steve would say request something, even casually, I made it happen. I was sub, before I knew what sub was. So for me, though I was effectively his slave, there was no use of collars, or demands for titles. He was Steve, I was myself. I did not need a collar or other symbol to define what we had because once he told me, you are my property.. it just was. So when you say that symbols, titles, ect do not mean what they once did, I have to say, that they once had little meaning. Think of it as an ebb and flow. What once was fashionable is no longer so. Trends change. I never did collars, but I was committed. I didn't see anyone doing them, though most of the men I knew had girlfriends who acted the same as I did. What you see symbol and meaning is what I see as a show. Because I didn't do them or know about them until 20 yrs after my first relationship. In a few years another trend will come along and the current crop will moan because the old ways were lost. It is life. Kyst
|
|
|
|