Hippiekinkster
Posts: 5512
Joined: 11/20/2007 From: Liechtenstein Status: offline
|
TY, Philosophy. I recall telling one of our resident "Libertarians" that I would be happy to let them opt out of our modern society. That means they would not have access to any of the things we pay for. Roads. Postal Service. Libraries. Military "protection". TV. The internet. I would be absolutely thrilled if they could go away and leave the rest of us alone, to organize society as we wish. As soon as one of them votes, they reveal themselves to be hypocrites. The act of voting is engaging in the society that they reject. Libertarianism is, to me, the petulance of a child who has no understanding that he is, for better or worse, a member of society. They have all sorts of arguments why what we have now is absolutely terrible, but they have no realistic, practical society with which to replace it. None. We have society because no one person, or family, is able to produce all that is necessary to survive independently. No person can build a house, tend fields, tan leather, make candles, preserve vegetables, forge plows, make needles to sew clothes with, make the cloth, make the glass for windows, make the nails for building, make roof tiles, grow herbs for medicines, make a generator for electricity, make light bulbs, shoe a horse, build a sawmill, or do any number of other things which need to be done to be "self-sufficient". The whole Libertarian fantasy breaks down when confronted with reality. Now they think they will be able to set up little enclaves where everyone contributes to the welfare of the whole community, but all they've done is re-invent the Commune. They've also gone Socialist. Hahahaha. That's why the far-right fantasy of Libertarianism is a joke. We are all interdependant. It is not possible for any one person, or family, to exist completely independently of others. Don't get me wrong. I think it's great that someone goes off and buys 20 acres in N. Alabama, and does the Homesteading thing. There's a bunch of folks not too far from there, in Summertown, TN, who have had a successful homestead for almost 40 years. But those folk at the Farm are not deluding themselves into thinking they are totally self-sufficient. They know they are inter-dependent. As do all other rational people, Ludwig von Mises notwithstanding. (clue time: this is 2008, not 1823 or whatever. This is not the Austro-Hungarian Empire, we are several decades past the Industrial Revolution, and there are considerably more people in the US than the 9 million or so who lived in Osterreich back then. Only flakes think von Mises, and his modern-day priests at the U of Chicago (hayek, et alia) have any relevance. Odd that they pay no attention to a more relevent and current economic analyst, Karl Marx. Well, people will belive what they want to believe. I'll be happy to consider the validity of the Libertarian socio-economic model, if they can show me a successful application of that philosophy.
_____________________________
"We are convinced that freedom w/o Socialism is privilege and injustice, and that Socialism w/o freedom is slavery and brutality." Bakunin “Nothing we do, however virtuous, can be accomplished alone; therefore we are saved by love.” Reinhold Ne
|