BitaTruble
Posts: 9779
Joined: 1/12/2006 From: Texas Status: offline
|
William Ayers, I don't think there is any doubt, was a terrorist and people died as a direct result of his influence if not his activities. I really don't believe there is any dispute to that and I certainly wouldn't dispute it myself. The question in my mind is .. was Obama aware of that when he sat down in Ayers living room to make his decision to run for office? Being about the same age as Obama, I had never heard of William Ayers before this presidential season began. I don't, generally, do background checks on people. Should Obama be held to a different standard than your average American? Should he be held responsible for, perhaps, being unaware of Ayers past? Ayers hasn't tried to hide his past but is Obama gullible for not running to Google to check this guy out prior to that first meeting? I'd put Rezko in that same sort of category. How much was Obama truly aware of, how close are they really and how much responsibility should Obama have in being accountable for the actions/activities of associates, co-workers, mentors and others? Does that same standard hold true for McCain? He's married to a drug addict/thief but the contention made by Mrs. McCain is that the Senator was unaware of her addictions/thiefing. Should McCain be held responsible for not knowing his wife well enough? Does her fathers affiliations with organized crime reflect on McCain? Then there is Keating. The McCain camps makes it a point to put the word out there that McCain was never convicted although he was wrist slapped by the ethics committee. McCain turned his act around, didn't repeat it so in that sense, seems to have been rehabilitated but it can't be denied he was certainly involved in the S&L fiasco that surrounded Keating. McCain associated with criminals but renounced the activities. Obama has associated with criminals but renounced their activites. I've seen the pundits talk about how important it is to the people that they be made aware of the connections that Obama has with dubious elements of society regardless of whether or not he, personally, has been accused of personal criminal activities himself. On the one hand, Obama may have some connections to such characters and on the other, McCain actually was one such character. In light of the economy, $2 trillion dollars of retirement funds lost over the last 15 months, are character attacks which can be done on either side really what the American people need to hear in a town hall or any other sort of debate?
_____________________________
"Oh, so it's just like Rock, paper, scissors." He laughed. "You are the wisest woman I know."
|