leadership527 -> RE: Submissives (10/7/2008 6:18:51 AM)
|
*sighs heavily* Yeah, what John said...again... DomBound45: Something to remember. A person comes to you with or without a naturally submissive personality. From there, is the decision to submit within some scope or context. As John suggested, your first problem is to figure out what exactly dominance and submission means to the two of you. The possible range of scopes and boundaries is so huge that it's unlikely you're both thinking the same thing. That initial decision to submit can be based on whatever reasons exist... it may be because the person is naturally submissive or it may be for god knows what other reasons. In truth, the reasons only matter from a "know your slave" perspective. It is the integrity that they bring to the decision, not the reasons for it that matter in terms of strength of the D/s dynamic. Finally, that decision sets you up for the final step. How much submission can YOU, as the dominant, bring out of this particular sub. This is going to be largely based on your patience, leadership skills, general trustworthiness, and the chemistry between the two of you. The foolish dominant thinks that he can claim an entire sub over night. In real life, it takes time for trust to develop... even for myself and my wife who'd been together for more than a decade before I collared her. Go slow. Allow that trust to build one step at at time. If you, as the dominant, prove yourself to be trustworthy with the authority the sub grants you then it's likely she'll grant you more. If, on the other hand, you extend your authority beyond the current trust levels... well.... BAD(tm) things happen. For the most part, it is my belief that a dominant gets the sub he deserves... for better or worse. What sort of sub do YOU deserve? ~Jeff
|
|
|
|