Termyn8or
Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005 Status: offline
|
For decades I have watched the bunking, debunking, dedebunking and the dededebunking and have come to a conclusion. I don't care. I know about photgraphy and light angles, and the results a still inconclusive. The flag waving without an atmosphere is something they don't want to talk about. I do know that back then alot of people had telescopes. They used to put them in the front entrance of Sears and other retailers right before Christmas tome. Sometimes empirical evidence is not all that sound. First of all they would have to fool the world, other countries have telescopes, big ones at that. There had to be something headed for the moon and something headed back. If it can make it, why not put people in it ? Second, the only reason they would have to lie is for political advantage, after all the Russians did beat us onto space (orbit-Sputnik). Saving face would not happen with a played out scenario like some say. There are too many people on this planet to shut them all up. If you want me to act all professional for a second, I say there is at least an 85% probability that we did indeed land on the moon, in a manned flight. Even if the pictures were fake, what the telescopes showed was not. And yes, IMO some of the pictures were fake, but that doesn't change the facts. I don't liken the fact that they faked anything, but they do what they do. I guess they are used to it. T
|