Naga
Posts: 147
Joined: 10/11/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Owner59 The numbers were good for most of Bush Jr.,production is way up.People are working harder than ever,but wages have been flat for the last 7 years while inflation climbs ever higher.That`s a real life pay cut. Unemployment was at a historical low and taxes were lower too. That is effectively a pay hike for the nation. quote:
If you factor in the mountain of debt Reagan racked up(the largest in history,at the time),his numbers don`t look all that good. The national debt was racked him higher and faster under Clinton than under Reagan. quote:
Plus he killed the alt.fuel programs and our safe energy future,and he hired and armed bin-laden and let Afghanistan fester. On the contrary, we actually had an energy policy under Reagan. That was brand new with his administration. And at the time, bin Laden was our ally against Russian aggression. quote:
Clinton payed down that debt and got us on the right footings for the future.We were paying down our debt and creating a surplus.The faith and credit of our government and country were improving and were tracking upward. And Clinton grew the economy,and made a stable financial environment,and grew the middle class.Savings were going up,consumer debt was going down,and consumer confidence was high. Bull. He was increasing the debt (by over a trillion dollars), his mismanagement caused the tech bubble in our economy and he was ignoring terrorism which lead to 9/11. quote:
Only to have all that squandered and then some,by another "shoot from the hip" con. Again, bull. He created a mess economically and politically that Bush had to clean up. Talk about being behind the eight ball...... quote:
There`s a damm good reason why most folks blame the cons over the curent mess. Yeah, they believe the lies of a liberal media and drink the kool-aid. Some are smart though. That is why the liberals have a lower approval rating than Bush does.
|