RE: Oral Servitude (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress



Message


FullfigRIMaam -> RE: Oral Servitude (11/2/2008 10:01:06 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MsStarlett
Mummy.... I am now collecting photos of tongues.   Please submit one with your application.
Didn't I just get an unsolicited tongue photo; I should say they're all unsolicited if they're undressed photos, but I've now realized I'd rather a cock shot than a tongue shot if I'm going to receive random nakedness.   M




Lockit -> RE: Oral Servitude (11/2/2008 10:05:16 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: FullfigRIMaam

quote:

ORIGINAL: MsStarlett
Mummy.... I am now collecting photos of tongues.   Please submit one with your application.

Didn't I just get an unsolicited tongue photo; I should say they're all unsolicited if they're undressed photos, but I've now realized I'd rather a cock shot than a tongue shot if I'm going to receive random nakedness.   M


I full heartedly agree!  I see a tongue in a picture coming at me...omg... I want to smack them away!  A cock is a cock... but there is something about the other.... whoa... no thank you!





FullfigRIMaam -> RE: Oral Servitude (11/2/2008 10:11:00 AM)

Yup, I said ewww when I saw it.   M




MsStarlett -> RE: Oral Servitude (11/2/2008 10:48:36 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: FullfigRIMaam

Yup, I said ewww when I saw it.   M


Maybe someone just clicked the wrong button.




thishereboi -> RE: Oral Servitude (11/2/2008 1:41:50 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: darchChylde

Okay, let's assume the position that cunnilingus is service *cough-gag-choke-bullshit*  Sorry, something was caught in my throat.  Assuming that to be the case, how the hell would 69 apply?  If that is the case, then wouldn't the dominant be equally servicing the submissive?  Actually, that's my new argument for cunnilingus not being service; i know that many dommes go down on their boys, so that means they are servicing them, right?


Good point. And what about the lesbian couples? Does the Domme become submissive if she goes down on her girlfriend?




Lockit -> RE: Oral Servitude (11/2/2008 2:05:49 PM)

Okay let me put it this way... if oral or a blow job is a submissive act... why is it that I have all the power with that member so close to teeth or in moving away and watching his torment or in denial of one or the promise of one?  I see it as total power in a fun way... but it is simply a sex act unless you are talking with former presidents.




PeonForHer -> RE: Oral Servitude (11/3/2008 9:44:08 AM)

I full heartedly agree!  I see a tongue in a picture coming at me...omg... I want to smack them away!  A cock is a cock... but there is something about the other.... whoa... no thank you!
 
Right, you've done it now.  No way am I ever sending you a pic of my tongue. Humph. :-(





Lockit -> RE: Oral Servitude (11/3/2008 10:08:14 AM)

lol Peon, I can live with that...  I love you talking... might love you doing many things... but a picture of a tongue just brings back memories of other tongues sent in picture form to me.  I guess it depends on how it was done.  Some pictures just remind me of a perv tring to impress me... I would take cock shots over that any day.  Now... invited shots of whatever might be different... Besides.. it isn't your tongue I was most interested in! hehe  I kind of like your brain.




PeonForHer -> RE: Oral Servitude (11/3/2008 10:11:14 AM)

No, nice try, but I'm still deeply wounded and dejected, Lockit.  My tongue is a work of art scorned by an unappreciative public.  I understand now how Vincent Van Gogh must have felt.  [:(]




Lockit -> RE: Oral Servitude (11/3/2008 10:14:32 AM)

ROFL...




PeonForHer -> RE: Oral Servitude (11/3/2008 11:45:36 AM)

You may rofl at me, Lockit, but ask yourself this: who's weirder, the sub who sends an unsolicited pic of a tongue, or the domme who actually demands to see a pic of a particular sub's tongue?




mummyman321 -> RE: Oral Servitude (11/3/2008 4:56:46 PM)

Who is to say what is weird and what is normal? Normal people think the BDSM people are weird and I think all the normal people are weird. So who is right and who is wrong?

BTW - I do not consider myself weird, just a little nuts from time to time :)

On the issue of long tongues I came across this website. This was a photoshop contest on morping tongues. Its rather funny and strange at the same time. Enjoy if you dare.
http://www.freakingnews.com/Tongues-Out-Pictures--1147.asp




PeonForHer -> RE: Oral Servitude (11/3/2008 5:21:17 PM)

I can honestly say that no woman has ever complimented me on the size of my tongue in the way I'd most like it to be complimented, MM.  A few, however, have passed admiring comments on my ability to stop babies crying with it.  I've just stuck it out, gyrated it a bit in front of the relevant baby's face, and said baby has instantly forgotten what it was it crying about. 




MsStarlett -> RE: Oral Servitude (11/3/2008 5:50:59 PM)

Your loss Lockit,  it's a very funny photo.





undergroundsea -> RE: Oral Servitude (11/3/2008 6:45:57 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lockit
I think most domme's were saying there is no force about it.  I know I was.


I agree that there is no force about it as in subs do not have to have their arm twisted ;-)

However, in most cases there is no forced in submission in general; in most cases submission is offered willingly to whom one wishes to offer it. I say most cases because some subs do wish to be somehow subdued, and some subs have fantasies, even if they offer submission willingly, where they are forced one way or another to comply with an order.

There are, however, commands and obedience in D/s. And there are different ways that people willingly express or receive submission. I think providing oral pleasure is one such way. Ordering a sub to massage feet is an act of dominance. Ordering a sub to provide oral pleasure is an act of dominance. Offering or wanting to give a foot massage can, amongst a mix of motivations, be an expression of submission. Offering or wanting to give oral pleasure can, amongst a mix of motivations, be an expression of submission. Whether it is or not depends on the persons involved.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lockit
Okay let me put it this way... if oral or a blow job is a submissive act... why is it that I have all the power with that member so close to teeth or in moving away and watching his torment or in denial of one or the promise of one?


Then is providing oral pleasure a dominant activity? I imagine those who have rape play fantasies wish to be ordered or forced to provide oral sex. Surely at that moment of providing oral pleasure the victim does not become dominant. I think providing oral sex is what one sees it to be.

A submissive is not in a dominant position when he provides foot worship to a domme simply because his teeth are near her feet. A submissive is not in a dominant position when he does dishes simply because he can break the china. In your situation you are using a blowjob as a way to create torment via biting, or a way to tease. It is not that giving a blowjob is dominant but that biting or teasing are activities that can fall in the realm of dominance or sadism.

And so, for you providing oral pleasure, at least in the way described, is not providing a service as might be for some people but a means towards providing physical and mental torment towards BDSM fun. This approach provides one example of how providing oral pleasure is defined not in absolute terms but by the persons involved.

quote:

  If they don't want to do it... not a problem... if I have to force you... we won't work.  How does one force someone to do something they tend to beg to do... somewhat like you are asking in that research. lol  Oral isn't a service...  Now... dishes is something one might need to force someone to do... but even in that, if I have to force it... see you...


Your post suggests that you consider doing dishes to be a submissive act.

Sure, it's a service. But a vanilla person might do dishes at a friend's house to be helpful. At such a time, I doubt that the person doing it feels submissive to the friend and I doubt the friend feels dominant over this person. This scenario is an example of whether an act of service represents submission or not depends on how it is perceived by those involved.

It seems that providing or receiving oral pleasure does not represent dominance or submission to you, which is fair enough. It is also fair for a person who sees D/s value in providing oral pleasure to hold that perspective--this person is not wrong for holding that perspective.

Cheers,

Sea




Lockit -> RE: Oral Servitude (11/4/2008 9:28:38 AM)

Sea... lol... I am typically joking much of the time and just throwing things out there because I either think something said was silly... or I am being silly or just maybe feebly trying to say... hey it's just sex, not submissive or dominant.  But... I have ordered oral... not forced it.  My submissive of course would have a say in whether they would obey or not. lol  I've never had one deny me that one..lol... however, they have refused my order on dishes and written assignments. lol  I don't see oral as a dominant or submissive anything.  It is fun to order something, but I don't ever force sexual acts and if I had to, there would be no relationship as there was something very missing.

The dishes thing was a sarcastic remark, period.

Now, that being said... I would like to add this... there are a lot of submissive men who really think oral is the end all of all things.  That might be so if most of them actually were good at oral.  Most that I have known were not.  The one's that were good at it, were amazing, unforgetable and did not go around acting as if it was something it actually was.  They didn't focus on it, didn't talk about it all the time and didn't act as if they were the god of all oral things.  That in itself made it special. lol

I realize that not everyone see's things the way I do and I am glad!  But when we blend silliness, trollishness and a whole lot of other things that have been a part of this thread and a few others on the topic... it is easy to think we know how one feels about it, when we might not.  Sometimes knowing the person is helpful.  I personally think it is silly to focus on one act of what one perceives as submission and not many others and when it is always a sexual thing they focus on... guess what... this domme is not going to take them seriously.




Lockit -> RE: Oral Servitude (11/4/2008 9:33:12 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

You may rofl at me, Lockit, but ask yourself this: who's weirder, the sub who sends an unsolicited pic of a tongue, or the domme who actually demands to see a pic of a particular sub's tongue?


I am so not going there and you can surely guess why!  Gotta love that entrapment stuff... lol




PeonForHer -> RE: Oral Servitude (11/4/2008 10:37:33 AM)

OK Donna,

For me it's an adoration thing, as I've said.  Maybe the ultimate adoration thing.  As per XaviersXian's definition earlier (may I coin the word "xianist" without Venatrix beating me up for it?  Probably not, so I won't.)

Whatever.  Anyway, there's a rock song (even an entire CD, if memory serves), that puts me in mind of a fantasy of "oral at its best" for me.  It conjures up an image of men worshipping in some kind of abbey.  The lead worshipper gets to perform oral on the woman (some kind of goddess, priestess or whatever) at the front of the abbey.  You hear a lot of monk-like chanting, then the occasional female voices singing in French.  Then some female orgasmic-style breathing and sighing.

Actually, the music's pretty cheesy, really, but it does create some great images for me.  Do you [or does anyone else] know what the hell it's called?  Came out about ten years ago, far as I remember.




Lockit -> RE: Oral Servitude (11/4/2008 10:52:06 AM)

LOL... okay for all who must know...lol... I love oral and love a man who loves it and does it well.  If he doesn't no big deal for me... if he wishes to adore me or oral... way cool... but when you get ten emails in a day and even crank phone calls... that talk about oral before you even know what the guy looks like, if you would like them or whatever OR the man puts too much focus on that one aspect of things.. no thank you, it is rather disgusting.

As for the song Peon... I don't know it, not sure if I ever heard it, thinking I would remember that one (!) but I would be interested in hearing it! lol

To make myself clear... I do not think any act of a sexual nature in itself dominant or submissive, per say...  It can be presented in a d/s sense, but to me it is simply sex.  D/s for me comes in the relationship itself and between the people involved and includes far more than just sex. I did think I made myself clear in most of my post when I said it was just sex... lol




AAkasha -> RE: Oral Servitude (11/4/2008 10:56:15 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

OK Donna,

For me it's an adoration thing, as I've said.  Maybe the ultimate adoration thing.  As per XaviersXian's definition earlier (may I coin the word "xianist" without Venatrix beating me up for it?  Probably not, so I won't.)

Whatever.  Anyway, there's a rock song (even an entire CD, if memory serves), that puts me in mind of a fantasy of "oral at its best" for me.  It conjures up an image of men worshipping in some kind of abbey.  The lead worshipper gets to perform oral on the woman (some kind of goddess, priestess or whatever) at the front of the abbey.  You hear a lot of monk-like chanting, then the occasional female voices singing in French.  Then some female orgasmic-style breathing and sighing.

Actually, the music's pretty cheesy, really, but it does create some great images for me.  Do you [or does anyone else] know what the hell it's called?  Came out about ten years ago, far as I remember.


Oh for sure it is not Consolidated, "You Suck"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hFNIrRAfuV0

"You're gonna have to give me more than just a token lick."

Akasha




Page: <<   < prev  7 8 [9] 10 11   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875