RE: Is it a hate crime? Part II. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


rulemylife -> RE: Is it a hate crime? Part II. (10/30/2008 10:44:11 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife
Either you have it, and accept the bad with the good, or you don't.


Would you argue that the there is no freedom of speech in the United Kingdom?


While I have visited, I haven't spent enough time there or have enough knowledge to argue one way or the other.




kittinSol -> RE: Is it a hate crime? Part II. (10/30/2008 10:45:35 AM)

I can, I am from over there: there is anti hate speech legislation over there and yet a perfectly workable free society with free speech and free expression. It works *shrug*. 




MasterVirago -> RE: Is it a hate crime? Part II. (10/30/2008 11:01:19 AM)

quote:


Are we attempting to equate minors with adults now and consider them both to be equal?

More specifially, are you going to reduce adults of other minorities down to the same level as children?

Because if not, then crimes involving childrens who aren't fully mature have more consequences then crimes involving adults.

The consequences of a crime committed against a white man by a white man and the consequences of the exact same crime commited against a black man by a white man are the same.

Children vs adults is not always the same unless you want to tell me that raping a little girl doesn't have the potential for far more severe psycholigical damage then raping a fulling developed and mentally mature woman.


The law regarding schools doesn't take into consideration the age of the school's students.
But that's not the point, I agree with all of the statutes I listed.

quote:


And which hate crimes are judged off motivation, it also requires the ability to read minds as some posters in this thread seem to have.


It doesn't require mind reading at all. Often someone's motivation can be deciphered simply from their actions and the things they say. It's a critical piece of our judicial system. The difference between degrees of murder is whether or not you intentionally killed a person or simply meant to cause them harm which resulted in their murder, or their murder resulted from an accident. Did they provoke you? Why did you attack someone, because you thought they were going to kill you? Did the police officer shoot to stop or shoot to kill? Intent and motivation make a difference.

quote:


quote:


Is it protected by Freedom of Speech, absolutely not. No matter how much you want it to be.


Could you provide facts that somehow show how this is not covered by Freedom of Speech as the judicial system currently is in this country rather than just telling me it's not?


I'm not a big fan of wikipedia, but they seem to be on point on this subject: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech
From the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (one of my fav reference sites) http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/freedom-speech/

quote:


quote:


Honestly, it amazes me. How can a community of people who are considered almost more taboo than homosexuality in some area of the country, be so closed-minded and bigoted?


Why? Because I think the death of a man should have equal value in the eyes of the law regardless of the difference of skin color and the motivations that led to that death?


I have no issues with anything you've said. I respect your stance and that of anyone who has an opinion, can express it intelligently and defend it with logic and facts. I was referring to comments on here obviously racially motivated and are frankly, some what tiresome.




rulemylife -> RE: Is it a hate crime? Part II. (10/30/2008 11:03:53 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife
The second being that those who believe it is are acting out of prejudice and bias, which I personally find insulting. 


Remember that this is the country where McCarthy conducted a witch hunt for thought crime with political ramifications that still exist today - where were the free speech advocates when it came to this? I cannot help but have a feeling that the balance is tilted.


I'm not quite sure what you are saying here.

It seems to me that the example you are using supports the point I am trying to make.

McCarthyism was the political correctness of its time.  Merely mentioning the 'C' word had you branded as a traitor.  There was no tolerance for anyone with even a tenuous link to anything deemed Socialist or Communist.

They were considered to be spreading hatred of America and their ideology was considered violent, dangerous, and in no way good for society.  Which is a paraphrase of one of your own earlier statements.




kittinSol -> RE: Is it a hate crime? Part II. (10/30/2008 12:09:02 PM)

I hope you're not saying that Nazi ideology is similar to communist ideas. My reference to McCarthy was precisely because the far right was given a free platform to develop whilst socialists were arrested in droves.

I have a feeling the legacy of this inbalance still lives on. Why else would it be that free speech gets invoked whenever far right actions and racism are involved?




Irishknight -> RE: Is it a hate crime? Part II. (10/30/2008 12:17:47 PM)

Wow.  Much catching up on this thread.

First, we have limited free speech in this country now.  We have laws on liable, slander, defamation of character, threats, and even cursing in public places in some areas.  My right of free speech is not supposed to trump your rights.  Thats why, even though I am prone to offering to commit violence to ignorant annoying jackholes, I am prepared to pay my fines without complaint. 
Hanging someone in effigy is an implied threat of violence and should be viewed as such.  Pay a fine or spend time in the pokey.  There should be no question about hate.  Of fucking course it was done out of hate... hate and stupidity.... hate, stupidity and a belief that one is superior to someone else....  DAMN!  I'm starting to sound like the Spanish Inquisition from Monty Python.




marieToo -> RE: Is it a hate crime? Part II. (10/30/2008 1:17:21 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aileen1968

But that seems to be some people's Utopia.  a place where everyone gets along and there's no violence, no need for money, everyone equal and happy, everyone loving everyone else...



Just wait till NorthernGent shows up to sing Imagine. 




kittinSol -> RE: Is it a hate crime? Part II. (10/30/2008 1:52:08 PM)

That song is banned, and NorthernGent is banned from singing too. 




CreativeDominant -> RE: Is it a hate crime? Part II. (10/30/2008 3:09:16 PM)

Nicely said, M.R..  I find it amusing that the dominant liberal media has portrayed the crime against Obama as an indicator of the racism that still exists in this country while the same crime perpetrated against Palin draws few words and certainly nothing about the crime against her having to do with prejudice against a woman.  Don't believe me?  Go to Google and see how many hits you get for the Obama story and how many for the Palin story in regards to these crimes.

So many people only want to see the black side of Obama.  Let's not forget that his mother was white.  That makes the man 1/2 white.  I know all the bad symbolism the crime brings up and yet, if it is strictly a racially-motivated crime then why...WHY...was the same crime repeated against Palin...a white conservative woman?




persephonee -> RE: Is it a hate crime? Part II. (10/30/2008 4:41:57 PM)

Yes, youre right. There is no more racism in this country. ive notified Larry King and he will be reporting on it this evening...but i hope he doesnt interrupt Survivor. i suppose Colin Powell feels the same, but wait, didnt he cite the nation's ever present racism as one reason he would not even consider running for President? [;)]

eta...the emoticon so as to remain pleasing.




persephonee -> RE: Is it a hate crime? Part II. (10/30/2008 4:53:14 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BlackPhx

My only comment is a simple one..

Better it is out in the open and can be addressed and guarded against, than in the dark and festering. Hatreds fuel of choice is fear, often what you fear you want to destroy. It could have just been a Halloween prank, it could be something else, I have heard shouts of "Kill Him" at McCain and Palin Rallies, have heard the opinion that Obama is Muslim, Arab, a Terrorist and a weak response from McCain.."He's a Decent Man." instead of what should have been said,  "He was born American and IS American, no matter what his parents were or what religion he chooses, that is one of our freedoms and as a Veteran I fought and will fight to protect that freedom." Frankly McCain would have earned a LOT of respect from me if he had stepped up that way instead of trying to fuel the fear.

Perhaps in the future we will know if EITHER of these effigy hangings, Palin or Obama was a prank or a Hate Crime, but we don't know now. Oddly enough college students have been hanging and burning effigies for ages, without malice..

Hmmm perhaps next year Universal should do a Presidential Election Halloween Horror Night..where you can go through a Congressional Budgetary meeting and Caucus Scare House..and Bills and Pork will jump out of the stacks as you walk through the fog of economics.


poenkitten


now im smelling hickory smoked bacon...im off to watch goosebumps and forget the world hasnt changed....the midget doesnt know any better yet...and he has no ulcers to contend with.




marieToo -> RE: Is it a hate crime? Part II. (10/30/2008 5:07:54 PM)

quote:

I find it amusing that the dominant liberal media has portrayed the crime against Obama as an indicator of the racism that still exists in this country while the same crime perpetrated against Palin draws few words and certainly nothing about the crime against her having to do with prejudice against a woman. 



No one here is going to directly address that, CD.  Trust me.  






MadAxeman -> RE: Is it a hate crime? Part II. (10/30/2008 11:46:18 PM)

McCarthy was politically correct?
I don't think we're in Kansas anymore Toto




vegeta -> RE: Is it a hate crime? Part II. (10/31/2008 12:33:05 AM)

Look ,It's just going to get worst. Kentucky could suceed from the Union again and that will start the chain reaction.




kittinSol -> RE: Is it a hate crime? Part II. (10/31/2008 5:43:19 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: marieToo

quote:

I find it amusing that the dominant liberal media has portrayed the crime against Obama as an indicator of the racism that still exists in this country while the same crime perpetrated against Palin draws few words and certainly nothing about the crime against her having to do with prejudice against a woman. 



No one here is going to directly address that, CD.  Trust me.  





You could start arguing that, if you wanted to. I think the reason Palin's effigy incident hasn't been discussed at such length is because it's not representative of hatred of women and of the desire to annihilate them all. In Obama's case, however, it's another problem. Back to square one, then.




CreativeDominant -> RE: Is it a hate crime? Part II. (10/31/2008 7:19:29 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

quote:

ORIGINAL: marieToo

quote:

I find it amusing that the dominant liberal media has portrayed the crime against Obama as an indicator of the racism that still exists in this country while the same crime perpetrated against Palin draws few words and certainly nothing about the crime against her having to do with prejudice against a woman. 



No one here is going to directly address that, CD.  Trust me.  



You could start arguing that, if you wanted to. I think the reason Palin's effigy incident hasn't been discussed at such length is because it's not representative of hatred of women and of the desire to annihilate them all. In Obama's case, however, it's another problem. Back to square one, then.


You think that.  You don't know in either case for sure though, do you...in all honesty?  No one has come forward or has been caught in the Obama incident so, as the Rabbit noted, we cannot know for sure the motivation behind the crime.  If we don't know the motivation behind either crime and yet, the crime against Obama rates an AP story and the crime against Palin rates what...a human interest story...what does that say about what the mass media possibly wants you to think?  The coverage alone tells you which one they rate as more important, not truly which one...if either...is indicative of a darker problem.





kittinSol -> RE: Is it a hate crime? Part II. (10/31/2008 8:06:34 AM)

And I cannot know for sure what the motivations was of those that burnt crosses and hung  people for real. Perhaps it wasn't anything else than a bit of fun there too?






JustDarkness -> RE: Is it a hate crime? Part II. (10/31/2008 8:08:06 AM)

so..did they arrest already some people who caused this thread to excist?




kittinSol -> RE: Is it a hate crime? Part II. (10/31/2008 8:12:28 AM)

Yes, two men have been arrested.





CreativeDominant -> RE: Is it a hate crime? Part II. (10/31/2008 12:21:18 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

And I cannot know for sure what the motivations was of those that burnt crosses and hung  people for real. Perhaps it wasn't anything else than a bit of fun there too?


No...that was definitely a hate crime of racist intent.  But there again, you had Klansmen and white crowds gathered around for it with no shame.  There's been no white crowd come forward to claim this crime against Obama...no Klansmen...no Aryan Brotherhood.  And I don't just assume that something is one thing when it may be something else entirely different.  Unless you think I should see the crime against Palin as a hate-based, gender-based crime?  And if so...again, where is the coverage of the crime as being such?  Rather than the coverage put over into the "human interest" files?




Page: <<   < prev  7 8 9 [10] 11   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875