theobserver
Posts: 456
Joined: 8/18/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: colouredin Now this is something that i have been sparked to think about due to a lot of the things discussed in this forum and things going on in the world. For example the American election and the equality thread and some things in my relationships. We have lots of labels applied to us, some due to biology, woman, daughter, some applied byb other people smart, pretty and some we apply to ourself submissive, honest. I was thinking which labeles do we take to mean the most and do we have to prove them. There are some people who think the label Dominant means that you have to hold that person in high regard, the label righ wing some of us see as bad. But how much do these labels colour our perception. I realised that I dont care what a person defines themselves as on these boards, i dont look to see if someone is submissive or Dominant, black or white, straight or gay. I read what they say and base my opinion on that. If i agree with someone one day I may not the next. I dont think thats true for everyone, some people seem hold certain people in higher regard maybe because they write longer posts or have a higher post count (i notced today people with post counts like mine that I have never seen on the main boards) A comment often thrown out there is 'well hes new, this is his first post' What I was wondering was to what extent do we have to proove ourselves, is there something that inherantly makes us respect a person more that isnt what they actually say? People talk about how annoying it is when someone cant spell, does that mean what they have to say is less worth while? I've said many times that I try not to judge people right away ... or try not to judge them at all, but that in actuality that is not the case. Ideas creep into my mind about who I think that person to be, based off the things they write, but that's not the whole of the person. We really don't know the full extent of who anyone is, until we actually spend more time getting to know them; then see them interact in other situations, around other people and in different environments. Some will like you and others won't. I don't think it's about proving but more what attracts each individual to certain personalities. Does that make sense? edited: damn I'm in typo hell today
< Message edited by theobserver -- 11/9/2008 3:07:56 PM >
_____________________________
It is left up to the reader to decipher & determine this post's validity.
|