watchersgirl
Posts: 23
Joined: 11/28/2005 Status: offline
|
This isn't a definition, but an opinion I'd like to add. I believe that a submissive in a D/S relationship is not a weak or necessarily even a naturally submissive person outside that relationship. I'm a sub who resists authority in my RL and is very assertive and who loves to argue. :-) Submission, IMO, requires strength b/c the sub is voluntarily and deliberately relinquishing his/her Selfhood. He/she might be a lawyer, a parent, an auto mechanic, a librarian, whatever. He/she (as in my case) could well be a control freak in his/her professional life or other parts of his/her non-D/S life. But the sub has the trust in his/her top and in his/her own strength to make a conscious choice to surrender his/her control to another and leave his/her social and professional position behind in the service and pleasure and control of another person. It's not easy! It's not supposed to be--because it's a real gift that wouldn't be meaningful if it was easy. It can be scary as hell, yet feel like the safest place to be. The sub is opening up, revealing, and surrendering innermost parts of him/herself to another and choosing to let that other person use, hurt, humble, play with, humiliate and control the most vulnerable parts of ourselves (and I'm not talking about bodily parts!). The best tops I've been with demanded total respect, obedience, and abasement from me. *And* they also respected me and my strength in surrendering my Selfhood and offering my submission. I had a domme who, while I was on the floor licking the soles of her boots, would tell me how much she respected my strength in willingly going as low as she chose to take me, submitting to her power and control, and looking up at her and to her by choice when I could easily be facing her eye-to-eye.
_____________________________
"The road of excess leads to the palace of wisdom."--William Blake "Do I contradict myself? Very well then I contradict myself, (I am large, I contain multitudes)"--Walt Whitman
|