CallaFirestormBW
Posts: 3651
Joined: 6/29/2008 Status: offline
|
On the other hand, it's been our experience that, if there are two (or more) people who are both interested and available to start at the same time, bringing them in at the same time, rather than bringing one in, getting a dynamic established, and then going through the upheaval of trying to bring someone else in later on may actually be easier. In either case, it takes about a year to completely integrate newcomers into a relationship... but when multiples come in at the same time, the integration takes place communally, over the year, rather than having a year to integrate one person, then stirring things up and having to take another year for each newcomer, in order to re-establish homeostasis in the relationship. In addition, there is the COHORT factor -- the Army figured out that individuals who are recruited together, train together, and are assigned together, and who are then deployed together work better together and experience less trauma and upheaval, even in highly stressful situations than their counterparts who are recruited individually and split up after training for separate duty assignments. Same goes for training two (or more) at the same time... if they're brought in separately, time has to be made to go through everything twice. If they're brought in together, all the common elements can be covered once, with both, and only aspects that are individual to each servant need to be covered separately.
< Message edited by CallaFirestormBW -- 11/20/2008 2:34:51 PM >
_____________________________
*** Said to me recently: "Look, I know you're the "voice of reason"... but dammit, I LIKE being unreasonable!!!!" "Your mind is more interested in the challenge of becoming than the challenge of doing." Jon Benson, Bodybuilder/Trainer
|