rulemylife
Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004 Status: offline
|
I initially supported the bailout, but having seen the course it has taken I was struck by how similar it was to the way the Bush administration handled Iraq. We were told in both cases of imminent danger and the need to act quickly. without adequate confirmation or investigation. Also, in both cases, the original reasons and solutions have changed into something far different than was originally presented. Ohio.com - Bailout backtracking rattles investors Nov 19, 2008 ... Akron, Canton, Cleveland and Northeast Ohio News, ... Published on Wednesday, http://www.ohio.com/news/nation/34726339.html Robert Eisenbeis, a former Atlanta Fed economist now with the hedge fund Cumberland Advisors, likened Treasury's piecemeal approach to water torture and said it hasn't helped business or consumer attitudes. Because ''scare tactics were used to stampede a vote'' on the bailout legislation, Eisenbeis said, Treasury's turnabouts suggested ''a lack of understanding of what the problems were to start with.'' ''If the program has morphed so rapidly, it really implies something about credibility,'' he said. Paulson, on Capitol Hill on Tuesday for a hearing of the House Financial Services Committee, was lambasted by lawmakers for his stewardship of the program. ''You seem to be flying a $700 billion plane by the seat of your pants,'' Rep. Gary Ackerman, D-N.Y., told him. ''It seems to be the second-largest bait-and-switch scheme that history has ever seen, second only to the reasons given to us to vote for the invasion of Iraq.''
< Message edited by rulemylife -- 11/19/2008 5:53:41 PM >
|