CatdeMedici
Posts: 2257
Joined: 10/20/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: celticlord2112 quote:
ORIGINAL: CatdeMedici The problem with this is the cost for most employers to change their payroll system to stop taking out taxes and the damage to audit and control systems. Having been a payroll clerk and an accountant, I can assure you that cost is minimal--simply set the percentage rates to 0 in the tax tables and it's done, then reverse it on a specific date. There is no "damage" to audit and control systems attendant upon such a change. Changes in withholding calculations are de rigeur for any payroll system, and the audit and control systems in place already deal with such changes. While the cost is non-zero, the cost of this stimulus mechanism is far less than the administrative cost of the Treasury mailing out a few hundred million stimulus checks. There is a cost to this idea, but you would be challenged to show that this is not the lowest-cost alternative. add to that, payroll tax paid to the government has to change, Income tax tables have to change, social security calculations have to change, medicare calculations have to change, 401K calculations have to change, people who can only make a certain amount each year and not lose benefits could be screwed---no it extends far beyond simple payroll calculation changes.
_____________________________
I am the Cat, holder of the whip and chair. "Let's see-whips, dips, chains, chips, yep sounds like a party to Me!"
|