Mercnbeth
Posts: 11766
Status: offline
|
This is a function of news services going under. In the old days of news, you couldn't publish anything without confirming it with 3 sources. It evolved into 1. Now - if its on the internet - run with it! The National Enquirer has as much credibility as the NY Times, and has actually beaten them on some stories. Why can't the PE just be pissed at a fellow Democrat doing something this stupid? I guess the same reason that the Democratic party in general hasn't. This is 'standard operating procedure' in BOTH parties. It's why there are more 'right' and 'conservatives' being placed in the PE Obama administration than there would have been in an McCain administration. 'Status quo' is what both parties strive. quote:
ORIGINAL: Musicmystery I finally just got tired of the neverending nonsense, blocked a handful of posters, and suddenly this forum is interesting to read again! A disclosing statement of confidence if I've ever seen one! Why put any source of light under a bucket if you desire enlightenment? Down right Biblical: Matthew 13:13: Therefore I speak to them in parables: because they seeing see not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand. Jeremiah 5:21: Hear now this, O foolish people, and without understanding; which have eyes, and see not; which have ears, and hear not.
|