Categories of Dominants

Categories of Dominants (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity

Message

PeonForHer -> Categories of Dominants (12/18/2008 1:14:08 PM)
I find it quite useful when trawling through the various profiles of dominas that they'll point out if they're interested in sadistic, motherlike, controlling (etc) behaviour. However, I've concluded recently that it would help a submissive male in his search for a prospective partner if dominant women were to classify themselves more specifically still. Perhaps the following suggestions for categories might be of assistance towards this: 1) Dominant women of the age of, oh, say, 38 and over, could be called "grand-dommes". 2) Those over the age of 50 could be called "great granddommes". 3) Those under the age of 35 could be called "dominettas". 4) Those of 5' 4" or below could be called "dommiekins". There could be flexibility with such a nomenclature and, indeed, I feel this should be encouraged. For instance, a very short, very young, domme could be called a "dominettakins", etc, etc. What does everyone else think?

Lockit -> RE: Categories of Dominants (12/18/2008 1:38:15 PM)
I think you are going to have a very interesting thread here! lol I can't eat pop corn... but I am looking for some chocolate to melt in my mouth while I watch this one blaze to life! hehe (Okay, damn it... I am hoping and projecting... but it tis the holiday season!)

LaTigresse -> RE: Categories of Dominants (12/18/2008 1:39:56 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: PeonForHer I find it quite useful when trawling through the various profiles of dominas that they'll point out if they're interested in sadistic, motherlike, controlling (etc) behaviour. However, I've concluded recently that it would help a submissive male in his search for a prospective partner if dominant women were to classify themselves more specifically still. Perhaps the following suggestions for categories might be of assistance towards this: 1) Dominant women of the age of, oh, say, 38 and over, could be called "grand-dommes". 2) Those over the age of 50 could be called "great granddommes". 3) Those under the age of 35 could be called "dominettas". 4) Those of 5' 4" or below could be called "dommiekins". There could be flexibility with such a nomenclature and, indeed, I feel this should be encouraged. For instance, a very short, very young, domme could be called a "dominettakins", etc, etc. What does everyone else think? I think it is evil to make me choke on my carrots sticks from laughing.[:D]

Lockit -> RE: Categories of Dominants (12/18/2008 1:51:16 PM)
I just realized what I would then be called. Damn it Peon... the older I get, the more you all give me to remember! That really sucks! I vote NO!

Aylee -> RE: Categories of Dominants (12/18/2008 2:13:37 PM)
As a dominettakins, do I get my own Pikachu?

trappedinamuseum -> RE: Categories of Dominants (12/18/2008 2:16:16 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Aylee As a dominettakins, do I get my own Pikachu? I think you have one, m'love. Or, at least some kind of rodent type of species....

beargonewild -> RE: Categories of Dominants (12/18/2008 2:54:05 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: PeonForHer I find it quite useful when trawling through the various profiles of dominas that they'll point out if they're interested in sadistic, motherlike, controlling (etc) behaviour. However, I've concluded recently that it would help a submissive male in his search for a prospective partner if dominant women were to classify themselves more specifically still. Perhaps the following suggestions for categories might be of assistance towards this: 1) Dominant women of the age of, oh, say, 38 and over, could be called "grand-dommes". 2) Those over the age of 50 could be called "great granddommes". 3) Those under the age of 35 could be called "dominettas". 4) Those of 5' 4" or below could be called "dommiekins". There could be flexibility with such a nomenclature and, indeed, I feel this should be encouraged. For instance, a very short, very young, domme could be called a "dominettakins", etc, etc. What does everyone else think? So if a Domme is say 5' 6" and taller then they'd be a "Long Tall Domme In a Black Dress?"

Lockit -> RE: Categories of Dominants (12/18/2008 3:22:16 PM)
Bear you forgot to add the age... that's when I bulked... age plus shortness...omg! And how come the tall ladies get a better name and a dress?!

Aylee -> RE: Categories of Dominants (12/18/2008 3:57:46 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: trappedinamuseum quote: ORIGINAL: Aylee As a dominettakins, do I get my own Pikachu? I think you have one, m'love. Or, at least some kind of rodent type of species.... PIKA! Pika Pika Pika Pi kaaaa Chuuuuu PIKA-CHU-UUUUUUU!

sunshinemiss -> RE: Categories of Dominants (12/18/2008 4:06:06 PM)
gezundheit.

Aylee -> RE: Categories of Dominants (12/18/2008 4:50:31 PM)
What does Skewes' number have to do with anything?

VampiresLair -> RE: Categories of Dominants (12/18/2008 5:14:57 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Aylee As a dominettakins, do I get my own Pikachu? Poke-ball bondage? There could be a kink for that

OneMoreWaste -> RE: Categories of Dominants (12/18/2008 5:29:09 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: PeonForHer 1) Dominant women of the age of, oh, say, 38 and over, could be called "grand-dommes". 2) Those over the age of 50 could be called "great granddommes". (snip) What does everyone else think? Damn, and I thought our abstinence-based "Sex Ed" was a failure in the U.S.! [&:]

MsStarlett -> RE: Categories of Dominants (12/18/2008 6:26:40 PM)
OneMore, Peon is a Britt. We can't blame him on Bush or even the "No child left behind". Tell ya what, I've only got a few more years before I become a Great Granddommiekins and I bet'cha I'll still be able break canes over your sorry hide and make you beg for more. I have fantastic traps. (Trapezius)

LadyPact -> RE: Categories of Dominants (12/18/2008 6:30:29 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: PeonForHer 1) Dominant women of the age of, oh, say, 38 and over, could be called "grand-dommes". 2) Those over the age of 50 could be called "great granddommes". (snip) What does everyone else think? This completely depends on if you're willing to take the beatings you would most certainly receive from those of us in the Grand Domme or above category.

beargonewild -> RE: Categories of Dominants (12/18/2008 6:40:53 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lockit Bear you forgot to add the age... that's when I bulked... age plus shortness...omg! And how come the tall ladies get a better name and a dress?! Now Lockit...even I know well enough NEVER EVER EVER make reference to a woman's age!

beargonewild -> RE: Categories of Dominants (12/18/2008 6:42:29 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: sunshinemiss gezundheit. They say sunshine that it gesundheit but comes back out loose! ~snicker~ edited to fix typo....thanks Phienix* [:)]

Phoenixpower -> RE: Categories of Dominants (12/18/2008 6:56:59 PM)
quote: gezundheit??? quote: guzundheit??? I do know that my english isn't perfect, but I do know that this is still meant to be written "Gesundheit" [8\|] ...and nope...am not a smartass, but at least that is something I know for sure...[&o]

Venatrix -> RE: Categories of Dominants (12/18/2008 7:30:25 PM)
PforH, You lured me out of "retirement" for this? You are in sooooo much trouble. And Bear, have I ever told you how much I love you? I'm 5'10".

purepleasure -> RE: Categories of Dominants (12/18/2008 7:37:37 PM)
I'm sort of fond of the "demanding Goddess" category. The above mentioned category that describes me, makes me sound like I should be a character in "The Wizard of Oz"

Page: [1] 2 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875