NeedToUseYou
Posts: 2297
Joined: 12/24/2005 From: None of your business Status: offline
|
I think regulation as we have it, is more dangerous than no regulation. Why? Because it gives a false sense of security and trust that things are being watched when they really aren't. If it were truly deregulated, then at least people would realize the shit is dangerous and probably be more careful. Anyway, instead of regulation, why not just require a 100% open books for any company worth over a million or something. I don't know, that is about the only way to make it "safe" and known. Regulators, get bought. Anyway, I doubt much will change, it's fighting human nature. Corruption is innate. The real problem though at the very core is there are to many types of financial instruments. I see little reason why there should be anything more than a long position, and simple insurance. Everything else is just complication. And taxes, should all be consumer side. Simple, anybody could then evaluate companies effectively. Whichever the solution ultimately, I'm sure one component is simplification, as this messes are hidden in the arcane, until they erupt.
|