RE: Richardson's Staff: We Didn't Hear the Question about the Grand-Jury Investigation, Honest

RE: Richardson's Staff: We Didn't Hear the Question about the Grand-Jury Investigation, Honest (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid

Message

ModeratorEleven -> RE: Richardson's Staff: We Didn't Hear the Question about the Grand-Jury Investigation, Honest (12/19/2008 9:31:52 PM)
Children, I'm getting tired of this. XI

Lorr47 -> RE: Richardson's Staff: We Didn't Hear the Question about the Grand-Jury Investigation, Honest (12/20/2008 3:18:41 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: celticlord2112 quote: ORIGINAL: kittinSol Better for them not to comment on a lot of things, considering the amount of sharks who are waiting to trip them up before the inauguration has even occurred. What do you expect, seriously? This is supposed to be the "Change" administration is it not? Everything is supposed to be open and transparent and above board, is it not? Surely someone selected by Dear Leader can't have any skeletons rattling around in his closet. As for what I expect out of the corrupt cronies of the debased Dear Leader....Richardson's cowardly running for cover is pretty much in line with my expectations. What else can one really expect from slime? Never mind.

celticlord2112 -> RE: Richardson's Staff: We Didn't Hear the Question about the Grand-Jury Investigation, Honest (12/20/2008 3:34:19 PM)
quote: And, of course, conservatives are always right and never cheat, steal, or other wise undertake fraudulent practices. Horseshit. Any politician can be corrupt. Which is the hypocrisy underlining this story. The incoming administration not only is not going to be less corrupt than the outgoing administration, its cast of characters gives every indication of being the most corrupt administration since Harding's. This isn't about Democrat vs Republican--those are merely convenient labels. This is about the promised "change" (transparency, honesty) vs the delivered "change" (pay-for-play).

Owner59 -> RE: Richardson's Staff: We Didn't Hear the Question about the Grand-Jury Investigation, Honest (12/20/2008 4:19:29 PM)
lol Considering the level and depth of corruption with the bushies,even Rod Blagojevich would be a vast imprvement! lol

Lorr47 -> RE: Richardson's Staff: We Didn't Hear the Question about the Grand-Jury Investigation, Honest (12/20/2008 7:40:47 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: celticlord2112 quote: And, of course, conservatives are always right and never cheat, steal, or other wise undertake fraudulent practices. Horseshit. Any politician can be corrupt. Which is the hypocrisy underlining this story. The incoming administration not only is not going to be less corrupt than the outgoing administration, its cast of characters gives every indication of being the most corrupt administration since Harding's. This isn't about Democrat vs Republican--those are merely convenient labels. This is about the promised "change" (transparency, honesty) vs the delivered "change" (pay-for-play). Yeh, but the rules have changed. The liberals will have control of the conservative toys including the Patriot Act. ( I just want the Internet concession using warrantless searches. Search a Conservative $19.95 or Find the Dirt $29.95 ) So the powers that be will be able to find out whatever they want in regard to conservatives (with the exception of the loyal populist conservatives such as Buchanan) and what will the out of power conservatives use to search liberals? Oh that is right conservatives are out of power. The need to know is zero. I am not being nasty. You fellows should have thought about the future when you created the weapon which destroyed the 4th amendment. It will now be used on you.

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125