samboct -> RE: Understanding Deflation and our economy woe's finally! (12/23/2008 6:40:56 AM)
|
"Btw, the tax issue alone is good enough to drive manufacturing (and any other type of job that can be performed remotely) overseas. Throw in draconian environmental and osha regulations and anyone who wants to open a major manufacturing plant in this country is subjecting themselves to a potential shareholder lawsuit (and should have their head examined). If you think the rich don't pay their fair share or universally make their money illegally, *YOU* are the problem." I suspect a far more important reason than taxes as to why manufacturers don't want to operate in this country has to do with what we're seeing now- i.e. the financial system has been a giant Ponzi scheme which has promised inflated returns on investment (ROI) for years. When an investor was offered a choice of 12% ROI using "complex financial instruments, hedge funds, highly leveraged money, etc." compared to investing in a manufacturing business whose ROI is more typically 8-12% in a mature business, where do you think the investment funds went? This lead to a spiral of costs in manufacturing because getting money got more expensive since the "complex financial instruments" were supposedly safer. The riskier your investment, the more money it costs you to get a loan. China didn't have those "complex financial instruments" and hence, the cost of capital in China was cheaper than in the US. China has also been able to cut costs on manufacturing because they haven't bothered with little details like IP, regulatory compliance, quality assurance, pollution controls, fair wages, etc. But taxes being so much of an issue? Haven't heard that discussed as much of a problem, and I regularly attend meetings where people discuss things like new plant production. Nor do manufacturers in advanced materials bellyache about OSHA regulations although the inspections can get a little tedious because the inspectors want to find stuff that's wrong to justify their jobs. But those "draconian" regulations as you call them managed to keep lead paint out of toys, ethylene glycol out of pet food, and melamine out of milk- as well as numerous other contaminants in our medicines when they were enforced (not under the current administration) The people I talk to generally acknowledge that the regulations help consumers feel safe and this in turn helps grow an economy. Nobody is suggesting getting rid of them- they want their plants and their products to be safe. They do feel that they are disadvantaged with respect to China which doesn't enforce either consumer of workplace safety. In terms of suggesting that the rich don't pay their fair share of taxes- well, they don't, since the divide between the rich and the poor continues to grow. See Harry Truman comments posted earlier as to why this is a problem for a democracy. I'd also point out that the main reason for this financial meltdown can be ascribed simply to greed- the rich people wanted to get richer and have brought the house of cards that they built down upon all of us. Greenspan wanted to believe that people were no longer greedy and that regulations were unnecessary. It seems to me that anyone who espouses the viewpoint that the rich need a tax break at this point hasn't been paying much attention to current events or has failed to comprehend their causes. Sam
|
|
|
|