LadyPact -> RE: CBT Techniques (12/27/2008 8:32:24 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: hardbodysub quote:
So, hardbody, you are basically reiterating for the OP that the post was created by being less than truthful to begin with. ????? That makes zero sense to me. What are you talking about? Since I'm evidently really dense, and just don't get it, let's recap. Maybe someone can help me get a clue. Not a problem. I'd be happy to do so. First there was this: quote:
ORIGINAL: DoubleBogey My Mistress would like to explore CBT with me. Then there was this: quote:
ORIGINAL: DoubleBogey I have an online friend that I have the fortunate opportunity to have r/t play sessions with four or five times per year. She is a switch and in a relationship. Her Dom allows her to have play sessions with me. I have met him and he approves. Technically, she is not my Mistress In other words, the OP proved himself not to be exactly truthful in creating the post to begin with. There was misrepresentation in the beginning where there was no need to be. Why should any of us be led to believe that all of his other statements were honest, when he couldn't be so in the first sentence of the first post? As I'm sure you are well aware, the fishing expeditions happen on this board all of the time. Everything from cbt, to humiliation, to every other kink that people come here starting a post hoping to hear some hot stories. When we don't provide them, suddenly we are the ones in the wrong for not doing so, even if we think we have a logical reason. In the third post on this thread, I made Mine perfectly clear. Also, alternative methods for learning have been listed by several of us. Google, private teaching, demos, events, and more. There's no reasons those aren't good options, rather than having us type out a long list of methods and techniques. As someone who does demos on certain subjects, let Me tell you that a lot of dang work goes into typing all of that stuff up. That kind of effort might be something I'm willing to do for someone I'm familiar with, as a personal favor, but it's probably not something I'm willing to put on a message board. (There do happen to be folks on these boards who can attest to this, as I've sent them instructions on different forms of play in private mail.) In closing, I happened to notice that not a single person who complained that we didn't do all of this work for the OP, was willing to do so themselves. There were at least two Dominants who complained about our not obeying the OP's wishes, yet they also didn't go to the time and effort to do so. In fact, hardbody, neither did you.
|
|
|
|