RE: Is There Really a Credit Crunch? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


celticlord2112 -> RE: Is There Really a Credit Crunch? (12/25/2008 11:10:51 PM)

quote:

In numerous threads you call bankers dishonest, lying and scum sucking maggots and then when you need "authority" you cite bankers as an honest source of irrefutable fact?

Two flaws in your argument:
  1. I can't recall calling bankers "lying scum sucking maggots".  I am vehemently opposed to these government bailouts, but my ire has been directly chiefly at the Congress for indulging in these bailout games.  My assessment of Wall Street has and remains "if they fail, they fail." 
  2. I'm not citing bankers as a source of irrefutable fact.  I am pointing out the existing of anecdotal information that runs counter to the view at a macro-economic level of a dearth of liquidity, aka a "credit crunch".




Lorr47 -> RE: Is There Really a Credit Crunch? (12/25/2008 11:18:36 PM)

quote:

Hippiekinkster: " Average people who are one paycheck away from crashing are invisible to righties except when they want their vote or their money."
quote:

ORIGINAL: celticlord2112

quote:

Name one way this depression impacts you.

I'll name several:
  1. Clients go out of business.
  2. Clients cancel/delay projects
  3. When cultivating new clients I am under greater pressure to discount my rates
The first two represent a decrease in the aggregate hours my company bills every month.  The third means I have to bill more hours to sustain a given revenue level.  Each of them means less money coming in.

Lean economic times have a dramatic effect on my business.  As the business owner, my responsibility is to respond to changing circumstance, and to adapt.  2009 is not likely to be a banner year for my company, but I am in no way, shape, or form, going to just give up and go under.  It may be a difficult year, but it will be a survivable year, and I am determined to be in business come 2010.



Hippiekinkster: " Average people who are one paycheck away from crashing are invisible to righties except when they want their vote or their money."

And, you will never see the problems.  If the impact is not to your wallet, it is not occurring.




Lorr47 -> RE: Is There Really a Credit Crunch? (12/25/2008 11:47:09 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: celticlord2112

quote:

In numerous threads you call bankers dishonest, lying and scum sucking maggots and then when you need "authority" you cite bankers as an honest source of irrefutable fact?

Two flaws in your argument:
  1. I can't recall calling bankers "lying scum sucking maggots".  I am vehemently opposed to these government bailouts, but my ire has been directly chiefly at the Congress for indulging in these bailout games.  My assessment of Wall Street has and remains "if they fail, they fail." 
You have called bankers virtually every name in the book for months and now you want to play semantic games (on second thought that may be all your doing)?  I am beginning to believe that you have never really held any position.  It is dangerous to state a position and stick with it.
  1. I'm not citing bankers as a source of irrefutable fact.  I am pointing out the existing of anecdotal information that runs counter to the view at a macro-economic level of a dearth of liquidity, aka a "credit crunch".
Then bother to read responses and learn:
"
Many of the business closures and failures are because there in no "commercial paper" available to make monthly/bi-monthly payrolls and deadlines.

This form of short term borrowing by businesses/institutions is their life blood.Many/most business don`t have enough money to cover months and months of over-head,waiting for income streams to arrive.

There`s little to no liquidity in those funds/money pools called "commercial paper"right now.They are locked up.

There are many many forms and types of credit,not just car loans and credit cards.
Ones we never see or know about,but that affect us all the same. "

< Message edited by Owner59 -- 12/25/2008 7:02:42 PM >




Out of my own curiosity, why do you always appear "offline" when you are always "on line." 




celticlord2112 -> RE: Is There Really a Credit Crunch? (12/25/2008 11:47:25 PM)

quote:

If the impact is not to your wallet, it is not occurring.

Umm......how are declines in revenues to my business not impacting my wallet?




Lorr47 -> RE: Is There Really a Credit Crunch? (12/26/2008 12:12:47 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: celticlord2112

quote:

If the impact is not to your wallet, it is not occurring.

Umm......how are declines in revenues to my business not impacting my wallet?



Sure declines in revenues are impacting your wallet and you recognize those picayune problems..  You  prove my point.  The only time you realize a problem is when it impacts your wallet.  I certainly agree with that since that is the mantra of politicians, wall street and most conservatives.  Hippiekinkster sure hit it on the head.  His one sentence reply sums up this entire opus.





Dominatist -> RE: Is There Really a Credit Crunch? (12/26/2008 12:32:38 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: celticlord2112

quote:

By your definition is a depression merely a correction?

Strictly speaking, yes.  Economic contractions are necessary to restore equilibrium in the system.

The single most influencial aspect of not having so-called equilibrium is because of the speculators. Add to that...the so-called business cycle and most lack of 'equilibrium' is because of a human cycle...over-building in times of high demand and under-building in times of low demand.

Banks will 'under' lend, producers will under produce and spenders will under spend. Presto...we have a recession.





Truthiness -> RE: Is There Really a Credit Crunch? (12/27/2008 8:36:50 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lorr47

Hippiekinkster: " Average people who are one paycheck away from crashing are invisible to righties except when they want their vote or their money."

And, you will never see the problems.  If the impact is not to your wallet, it is not occurring.



Ironically, studies show that conservatives donate as much as 30% more to charity than liberals.




Lorr47 -> RE: Is There Really a Credit Crunch? (12/27/2008 10:48:47 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Truthiness

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lorr47

Hippiekinkster: " Average people who are one paycheck away from crashing are invisible to righties except when they want their vote or their money."

And, you will never see the problems.  If the impact is not to your wallet, it is not occurring.



Ironically, studies show that conservatives donate as much as 30% more to charity than liberals.



William Jewett Tucker, a reverend and future president of Dartmouth College, put it this way in 1891: Critiquing Carnegie's "Gospel of Wealth" he declared that a society could make no greater mistake than asking charity to do the work of social justice




Lorr47 -> RE: Is There Really a Credit Crunch? (12/27/2008 11:18:32 PM)

quote:

Ironically, studies show that conservatives donate as much as 30% more to charity than liberals.


Lets see.  Celticlord is always shown off line but is always on line.  Truthiness has a hidden profile.  Hmm.... could Truthiness be the nom de plume of Celticlord?  No way, conservatives are "manly men." Aren't they? (Hey, its past midnight.)

William Jewett Tucker, a reverend and future president of Dartmouth College, put it this way in 1891: Critiquing Carnegie's "Gospel of Wealth" he declared that a society could make no greater mistake than asking charity to do the work of social justice




Truthiness -> RE: Is There Really a Credit Crunch? (12/28/2008 4:07:33 AM)

Which, even if you agree with William Tucker; that's irrelevant to my point, which was simply to refute Hippiekinkster's dramatic but wrong generalization.




Truthiness -> RE: Is There Really a Credit Crunch? (12/28/2008 4:10:35 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lorr47

quote:

ORIGINAL: celticlord2112

quote:

In numerous threads you call bankers dishonest, lying and scum sucking maggots and then when you need "authority" you cite bankers as an honest source of irrefutable fact?

Two flaws in your argument:
  1. I can't recall calling bankers "lying scum sucking maggots".  I am vehemently opposed to these government bailouts, but my ire has been directly chiefly at the Congress for indulging in these bailout games.  My assessment of Wall Street has and remains "if they fail, they fail." 
You have called bankers virtually every name in the book for months and now you want to play semantic games (on second thought that may be all your doing)?  I am beginning to believe that you have never really held any position.  It is dangerous to state a position and stick with it.
  1. I'm not citing bankers as a source of irrefutable fact.  I am pointing out the existing of anecdotal information that runs counter to the view at a macro-economic level of a dearth of liquidity, aka a "credit crunch".

Then bother to read responses and learn:
"
Many of the business closures and failures are because there in no "commercial paper" available to make monthly/bi-monthly payrolls and deadlines.

This form of short term borrowing by businesses/institutions is their life blood.Many/most business don`t have enough money to cover months and months of over-head,waiting for income streams to arrive.

There`s little to no liquidity in those funds/money pools called "commercial paper"right now.They are locked up.

There are many many forms and types of credit,not just car loans and credit cards.
Ones we never see or know about,but that affect us all the same. "

< Message edited by Owner59 -- 12/25/2008 7:02:42 PM >




Out of my own curiosity, why do you always appear "offline" when you are always "on line." 


Basic messageboard knowledge 101 - In your profile settings there's an option to not show up in online lists; just click the box.




Lorr47 -> RE: Is There Really a Credit Crunch? (12/28/2008 8:16:20 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Truthiness

Which, even if you agree with William Tucker; that's irrelevant to my point, which was simply to refute Hippiekinkster's dramatic but wrong generalization.


How does your post refute Hippiekinkter's post?

First, Giving to a charity often has nothing to do with the poor especially if the giving is to a Conservative charity .  ( Isn't  "Conservative charity" an oxymoron?)

Secondly,  Jim Lindgren  in commenting on Arthur Brooks's "Who Really Cares" states in part:  "Written for a general educated audience, the book is quite accessible. Even to someone like me who had discovered some of the patterns that Brooks identifies, I found much that I hadn’t seen or thought about. He is much more sanguine about the good that charitable giving does than I would even dream of being. And I hadn’t considered the benefits to the giver (including developing social capital) that Brooks so enthusiastically endorses. But then, my research focuses more on attitudes, than on self-reported behavior.

Brooks' conclusion is based on "self reported behavior."  Now all we have to believe is that on any given day and on any given topic Conservatives will remotely tell the truth.

Thirdly, another way of interpreting  Brooks' analysis is that Conservatives self report such behavior so they can publicly  pat themselves on the back. (Brooks' examination of the benefit to the giver.)   Now that I can believe.

Lastly, even Lindgren is not sold on the effectiveness of giving to a charity; much less a conservative charity.  A cynic like me is going to assume that a conservative charity will have a Jack Abramhoff  in charge and the conservatives will get the money back somehow behind close doors.




Lorr47 -> RE: Is There Really a Credit Crunch? (12/28/2008 8:29:03 AM)

quote:

Basic messageboard knowledge 101 - In your profile settings there's an option to not show up in online lists; just click the box.


I know the "how." I just am wondering about the "why."  Cheney has made me suspicious of secretive people.

(The non sequiturs are lending credence to the nom de plume thought.)




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125