Demspotis -> RE: Do you think Israel and the Palestinians will ever stop fighting? (12/30/2008 12:39:49 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Raechard Britain didn't divide anything other than India and Pakistan. Israel as a state was formed by terrorists and now they are facing other terrorists. Can we instead blame the US and Iran for arming Israel and Palestine respectively. This is a fight by proxy, when is the middle man going to be cut out? Britain also divided Ireland. This was precisely the same tactic as it later used on India: tear away parts of a country (as its independence is being returned to it) predominated by an oppressive foreign minority (Muslims in India, Protestant Lowland Scots in Ireland) to appease them, and thus simultaneously weaken the restored nation by dividing it into mutually hostile pieces. (Background for whoever might need it: (1) the British transplanted Lowlanders, mostly extreme Presbyterians, from Scotland into what is now Northern Ireland, to be ruling class over the native Irish, who were and are mostly Roman Catholic. The Lowlanders are mainly related to the English, whereas the Highlanders are related to the Irish. When the British gave up their claim on most of Ireland, they divided it and kept the part that they had previously filled with Lowlanders, now called "Northern Ireland". (2) Muslims invaders of India, as well as native collaborators, mainly concentrated in the northwestern and northeastern corners of India, both of which the British ripped from India to create Pakistan. The western Pakistanis oppressed the eastern ones, who spoke a different language and were mainly a different ethnic group, Bengali; so the eastern part seceded from Pakistan, with help from India, to become Bangladesh. Sad to say, this did not make the Bangladeshi Muslims any less oppressive to the Hindu minority in their territory. ) As for the Middle East, the British AND the UN divided the remains of the former Turkish Empire into many artificial nation-states, including leaving Asia Minor and a tiny piece of Europe to the Turks; and included in this process the restoration of the Jewish people to their homeland, from which they had been exiled by the Roman Empire approximately two millennia ago. Keeping in mind that the exiled Jews had been under nearly-constant threat of persecution and genocide everywhere they went, except (interestingly enough, Ireland and India!), during that whole time, of which the Holocaust was only the last and worst example, it was right and just to restore them to their own land. Unfortunately, it was not done in a way that could have resulted in peace. Can they now achieve peace, that being the case? It's possible. The problem at the moment is that some of the major players don't want peace with the other side, they want only total victory. That also brings a kind of peace, but not the kind that we are talking about... So, in order to achieve peaceful coexistence, they would need to neutralize the fanatics on all sides, recognize each other's claims on the sacred sites, and to the land and its resources, and to agree to peaceful co-existence, as well as recognizing their shared origins (Jews on one hand and Muslim and Christian Palestinians on the other) as something real and meaningful to them. ~Demspotis
|
|
|
|