RE: The Ideal Measurement of Manhood ? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


BootSadist -> RE: The Ideal Measurement of Manhood ? (1/12/2009 12:11:47 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dastan

Dear Ladies...

Thank you so much for your answers.....allow me now to explaina  problem we have here.

I am a single user, this is my private account, nobody reads it, nobody sees the posts. I don't quote, nor refer to anyone, but I happen to be the english-fluent part of a small club of men here who are interested in BDSM. We train together in sports and study together, and share the same similar trait for BDSM. And believe it or not, we don't see porn, we don't have masturbatory fantasies with picture galleries or stories...

My country is a wasteland of BDSM where it can be compared to practicing witchcraft out in the open for anyoen to see during the Dark Ages, here, I have scars from confessing to my now ex-girlfriend froma  2 years+ long relationship what my fantasies were. And I'm not the first and won't be the last guy chased into the street and exposed to shame as a thief surprised when fleeing the scene of his robbery and bearing marks for it.

As for sizes here, I will simply say based on the statistics here that the girth that Miss CalifChick and Mister Aravain commented on, the diameter here is fluctuating between 1,69 and 1,94 inches for the vast majority of us, with a circumference or girth of 5.38 to 5.71 inches, this is after translating the measurements.  I find myself  closer to the high end as most do in my region. Lenghts oscillate betwene 6.27 and 6.68 inches.

Now, thanks to some stupid mistake by a person who had a below average endowment and injured himself with a strange device purchased overseas, a clinical case I was able to see and read the file about, I sort of came to some conclusions and thanks to our studies on tissue formation inducents (my country is plagued by landmines, we have a war with bomb-loving guerrillas) we just found a way which a more advanced student used in need of it, and he had a small but appreciable gain, approximately 1 inch in 7 months, permament gain and still fully functional, which motivates us to ask in order to see how can we sort of enhance ourselves to match the best or the ideal parameters to become better, just as we have used new techniques and devices as well as stimulation to enhance our bodies to a better aesthetic and athletic performance.

So all in all, your wonderful replies about size have been greatly useful, but we wish to learn more and hear more so as to have a small statistic, at least 100 opinions of measurements that allow us to have our own chart and know what the expectations are. So far, we conclude the 7-8 inch lenght is the desirable measurement, but we wonder...why is it that a number of websites and women forums mention as ideal penises of 8+ inches to 9,5 (9 and 1/2) inches in lenght ? That is soemwhat bigger and would mean the cervix stimulation is stronger and requires more caution.


My friend, I have met your kind before. You are a Median, are you not ?




hizgeorgiapeach -> RE: The Ideal Measurement of Manhood ? (1/12/2009 2:24:43 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

a smaller guy tho tends to be more attentive.  ....attentive can be good.  



That might be your experience in the Gay date set, but not so much so my experience in the straight date set, PA.  The guys who are significantly smaller than average are usually absolute pieces of shit - inadequacy issues turn them into dickheads, and not the good kind.  Attentive?  No - more like paranoid and insecure, and constantly looking for reassurances that it's Not below average even if he Knows that it Is below average.




GimpinDenial -> RE: The Ideal Measurement of Manhood ? (1/12/2009 8:45:08 PM)

it's funny....from what I have seen, most small endowed guys in the gay scene are usually bottoms....lol
However, considering how many straight assholes out there, I think you might be right.....




aravain -> RE: The Ideal Measurement of Manhood ? (1/12/2009 9:12:18 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: GimpinDenial

it's funny....from what I have seen, most small endowed guys in the gay scene are usually bottoms....lol


*raises hand*

Which is a good thing. What would I do with a prodigious pecker? Nothing. I don't like having it played with in most cases, and I really don't like penetrating others (it's a psychological thing). In this case anatomy won out :P




beargonewild -> RE: The Ideal Measurement of Manhood ? (1/13/2009 8:10:48 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: hizgeorgiapeach

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

a smaller guy tho tends to be more attentive.  ....attentive can be good.  



That might be your experience in the Gay date set, but not so much so my experience in the straight date set, PA.  The guys who are significantly smaller than average are usually absolute pieces of shit - inadequacy issues turn them into dickheads, and not the good kind.  Attentive?  No - more like paranoid and insecure, and constantly looking for reassurances that it's Not below average even if he Knows that it Is below average.


And that applies to both straight and gay men. So whether gay men with small cocks are bottoms, well once I ask all the gay men I know I'll let you know   [&:]




subtee -> RE: The Ideal Measurement of Manhood ? (1/13/2009 3:28:21 PM)

...carry the one...


[Kidding!]



p.s. I hear an awesome Antonio Banderas accent in my head when I read your posts [sm=wave.gif]
p.s.s. I know Antonio Banderas is from Spain, not Columbia. Still. 




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125