Amaros -> RE: Substitute term for "slave" (1/12/2009 7:51:48 AM)
|
It's hard to avoid using it, it's a common form of self identification in this life, i.e., if you think you're a slave, you are, and damned if anybody is going to talk you out of it anymore than the reverse. There are modifications of course, there are anal slaves, service slaves, etc. -"bodyslave" for example, which is enough of a qualifier that nobody will think you have a bunch of Chinese Nationals locked up your basement. I'm kind of partial to "Cockslave" myself, although it more sexual than service oriented connotations, and maybe more of a private/scene specific appellation - I think for general purposes, "subslave" is probably enough of a distinction to avoid confusion in most situations, if it is a concern, and it rolls off the tongue almost as easily as plain old slave.
|
|
|
|