Cagey18
Posts: 662
Joined: 9/7/2008 Status: offline
|
Geez cory, you really believe all the nonsense Rush, Sean and FauxNews spoon-feed to you? Apparently so, keep reading: quote:
ORIGINAL: corysub Americans, like every other voter in a democracy, vote on the basis of "what have you done for me lately". Speak for yourself. You certainly do not speak for me, or hordes of other Americans. I see...I guess you are not part of the crowd in Washington D.C. that governs based on "Polls". In case you might not be aware...a "poll" is the measurement of how people feel on a particular issue and how it is affecting their vote......in other words..."what have you done for me lately"...Maybe se should start an educational thread on the meaning and use of polls. You can begin by educating yourself that "poll" does not equate to "what have you done for me lately", not even if you simply put them in the same sentence. Follow that up by educating yourself on how Americans view candidates and vote for them. quote:
The fact that Bush had his agenda totally sidetracked by 9/11 And what 'agenda' was that, exactly? The failed attempt to privatize Social Security? The dogged determination to ignore intelligence and advice re bin Laden from members of the Clinton adminstration? That 'agenda'? That "failed attempt to privatize Social Security" will do more harm to the future retirement of young people who were sold a bill of goods by the democrats that this legislation was proposed only to help Wall Street. Who among us here does not think they could do a better job of running their money than the government? Gimme a break... Again, an education on how Social Security works is in order. Privatizing takes away from current retirees' checks. As far as ignoring member of the Clinton administration...you have a convenient memory lapse here. It was Bill Clinton who did not go after Bin Laden when Yemen offered him on a plate It's laughable that you are repeating this favorite-of-conservatives tale, disproved long ago, by Bush's 9/11 Commission no less. And it wasn't "Yemen" dummy, it was one Pakistani named Mansoor Ijaz, who was so unreliable not one government would sponsor his bogus story. And surprise, surprise...Ijaz then became a 'commentator' on FauxNews. quote:
and yet was able to get us out of the Clinton recession Amazing you wingnuts keep repeating this lie. I guess you've conveniently forgotten that Clinton left Bush with a considerable surplus, which spendthrift Bush quickly turned into a massive deficit. Another memory lapse, I guess. There was a downturn in the economy in 2001 that began in the Clinton final quarter. BTW..:"wingnuts"....LOL..I kinda like that.. Yeah, the dot-com bubble, the 9/11 attacks, and the Enron et al accounting scandals (Dec 2001 - present) were all Clinton's fault. LOL! I notice you didn't address Bush turning a surplus into a massive deficit at all. Why am I not surprised. quote:
and the loss to the economy after the Towers fell is amazing. Yeah, what a fantastic job Bush has done with the economy in those 7 1/2 years, huh? You can look up the affects of 9/11 on the economy. I'm tired or doing your research. Holy crap, you can't even comprehend your own words? Your own OP claims Bush 'got us out of' the post 9/11 economy drop. As far as the recession we are in now, sure Bush is a contributor, The first sensible thing you've said in this entire post but he also is the guy that was warning about the problems coming from the sub-prime area, along with McCain I might add, Uh, no. In fact, it was McCain's own economic advisor Phil Gramm (R) who authored the bill that created credit default swaps, the root cause of the current economic crisis, and the failure of IHG, Lehman Brothers, et al. but the democrat party focus on housing for everyone and forcing the banks to make loans to people who had no income checks or if they even had an income...and than Barney Frank et al changed the rules governing FannieMae and Freddie Mac to allow them to buy this crap from banks.... As I pointed out above, the $700 billion bailout was caused by Phil Gramm's bill, not the housing bubble. If not for his gift to his banking buddies, it would have been a $70 billion bailout instead of $700 billion. And the 'forcing' of banks was not by Democrats, but rather by mortgage portfolio investors' greed demanding more mortgage loans to make more portfolios. Lenders were more than willing to comply, issuing 'declared income' loans etc. There is more than enough blame to go around on this one. Just look at the proposed pork laden democrat stimulus bill and you can see where we are heading...DOWN! quote:
People soon after that horrible day clamored for action, and the President did what he gets paid to do...protect the homeland. Yeah, that would explain why he attacked the country (Iraq) where bin Laden wasn't, instead of going after him as he'd promised, the country that had nothing to do with 9/11, and in doing so created more members of al-Qaeda. Heckuva job, Bushie! Another expert on jihad...the fact that al-Quida recruits went to Iraq is true. And of course you're missing the point. They weren't al-Qaeda recruits until our presence in Iraq created them. However, radical Islam has been growing for decades and first really gained notoriety with the assassination of Sadat. In the Phillippeans, Pacific Islands, Indonesia, Pakistan, and Afganistan militants have been active and growing. Iran is the pinicale of such power and until Bush threw them out the Taliban had it in Afganistan. One thing no one can discuss, surprisingly since the left is so full of theory, what would the world be like if Bush had not rid the planet of Sadaam? Maybe two nuclear powers in the Mideast...?? , well three if you count Israel. He'd be contained like any other dictator (Kim Jong-Il, Omar Al-Bashir, Mugabe, etc.), as would nuclear efforts. Your own 'memory lapse' neglects that there were UN inspectors in Iraq 24/7 making sure of that, until Bush threw them out to start the Iraq War in 2003. You remember that war, don't you? The one that was going to be a cakewalk, have flowers thrown at our feet, wouldn't cost more than a billion dollars (it's up to, what, 700-800 billion so far?), and would be over in a few months? quote:
We have not had an attack since and it certainly is not because the Islamic extremists have not tried. And of course you have proof of these attempts, right? You can't be that naieve! Again, a memory lapse possibly? The foiling of the plot in 2006, fairly recent, to blow up U.S. bound planes with thousands of people, resulting in the arrest of a couple of dozen muslim terrorists. Funny that your own link below makes no mention of this. A memory lapse possibly? (you can't count airline shoe-bomber guy, BTW--he slipped through Bush's tight security net and was caught by an alert passenger, not anyone in Bush's adminstration) There were a number of attempts to wreck havoc in the U.S. that were broken up...that we are aware of ...and I guess you would not believe that there are not operations that you and I are not privalged to know about, yet. Again...please use google if memory does not serve you. http://wcbstv.com/local/Terrorism.New.York.2.244858.html You're funny! The very first 'examples' I see in this claim from the Bush State department: 1. Shoe-bomber guy (already addressed, prevented by a passenger, not Bush) 2. Jose Padilla (hmm, finally went to trial, and geez, no evidence of the radioactive 'dirty bomb' Rumsfeld got everyone so excited about! Amazing) 3. Lackawanna Six, went to an al-Qaeda camp, convicted of providing material support to a terrorist organization. Charged or convicted of conspiracy to "wreck havoc in the U.S" as you allege? Nope. Heckuva job Bushie! quote:
We will never know just how many attacks, such as the planned bombing of nine airliners over the Atlantic And of course you have proof of these nine planned airliner bombings, right? You are joking ...right? Are you over 18 or is this a trap by "Catch a Predator"??? Funny--your own link below makes no mention of this one either! Another memory lapse? quote:
If we are seeing a failure of his pork laden stimulus package which, unfortunately, is my bet, in two years time Pelosi will be sipping latte's in San Fransciso. Breaking news: Noted political pundit corysub predicts Nancy Pelosi, who has won 11, count 'em, eleven straight victories, will be defeated in 2010. Errrr...sorry about that confusion... I should have been more clear. I should have said voted out as Speaker of The House! We're noting this erudite prediction as well. You heard it here first, folks. Yep..you heard it here first.LOL...it's amazing the fantasy world some people live in... I'm still laughing at your fantasy world, where Bush improved the economy, Iraq was getting nuclear weapons, where Bush's crack security team saved us from the shoe bomber, and Nancy Pelosi is voted out.
|