DominaSmartass
Posts: 961
Joined: 1/12/2006 From: This month? Maryland Status: offline
|
I am not a huge proponent of safewords, in fact I don't use them at all unless the bottom brings it up during negotiation of the scene. This is because I, like others, would rather the person I'm playing with just tell me in plain English that there is something wrong and depending on the type of relationship I'm in with the person bottoming, they may or may not have a prescribed way to phrase their feelings to me, but one way or the other I expect them to communicate it. Then - again depending on our relationship - it is up to me to decide how to proceed or not proceed with the information I'm given. But there are situations where I believe safewords come in handy and that is any scenario in which resistance, fighting back, and "nonconsent" are part of the scene. As you say below: quote:
ORIGINAL: allthatjaz Is it fair on him to expect that even through an intense struggle when arms, legs and even teeth are lashing out at him, that he knows when I have truly had enough? I say no, none of us are mind readers. I don't have a lot of experience playing with people who fight back, hence why I don't play with safewords generally. But if I knew someone did struggle and protest I would make sure there was some way to communicate a real problem as opposed to everything else. My opinion on the use of safewords is that their use/non-use should be governed by whichever is the easiest, most clear, most concise method of communicating a problem, taking into consideration the people involved, their familiarity with one another, and the type of play happening. The choice to use or not use a safeword should not be seen as a measure of how good, close, or real a relationship is but as a practical decision based on practical factors.
_____________________________
“These S&M people ... they are bossy! There’s also a creepy connection between leather sex, ‘Star Trek’ and the Renaissance Faire.” - Comedian Margaret Cho
|