corysub
Posts: 1492
Joined: 1/1/2004 Status: offline
|
Hillary Clinton didn't lose because she was a woman....she lost the nomination, and probably the presidency, because her organization was too rigid in their strategy and failed to react to the Obama express. The flowering oratory of the charismatic man from Illinois dominated the early caucus States that were essentially ignored by Clinton. The media had "chills up their legs" when Obama gave speeches and fell out of love with Hillary like a sailor sobering up the morning after a fun filled evening. Other than talk radio, and a handful of TV pundits, the bulk of the media basically just swooned over the man and ignored the vetting process. The "historic" possibility of a black President, fueled by magnifcant wordsmithing ,was the driver not intelligent, well-defined programs. The man promised "change" and a majority of people wanted "change" too.. not programs. What kind of change is now the question on the table and we now have a leader still basically an unkown. That's another topic and there will be countless threads over the next four years on this topic. If Hillary had just been herself as we saw late in the campaign we might in fact have the first woman President, in my opinion. And not because she was a woman but because she was the best of the "final three", in my opinion. I voted for McCain but my wife and daughter were for Hillary and I was leaning towards her because of her experience, her grit, and her understanding of the issues that I felt were important. Interestingly, I never made a pro or con opinion on Hillary because of gender.
< Message edited by corysub -- 1/20/2009 12:13:51 AM >
|