UPSG
Posts: 331
Joined: 1/22/2009 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: OttersSwim So I would like to ask your thoughts on public play vs. private play, and if/how being a Dominant woman with a male submissive affects your play, if at all, in public vs. private. What is the energy or environment or physical difference? Is there one? What do you like about public play, and what do you not like? And for the boys...I was very nervous about being a submissive male in a club experiencing public play. Wondering about your experiences and how you perceive your place as a male submissive in a public BDSM environment like a club or a munch. How is public play vs. private play for you? For myself, once I figured out that "male submissive" had a place and that no one was surprised to see me wearing a collar and cuffs, being naked...or even crying...it became much easier to just be...a male submissive...a bit like the tethered hawk looking back at the curious crowd. So, would you say, your Mistress exposing you (naked or otherwise) to the public, ultimately had the affect of putting you at ease and conditioning you into your "place"? In respects to the public setting, I'm happy you made sure to mention you were collared, cuffed, naked, and crying. You didn't, however, mention where your Mistress boot of heels were in all of this? I've never been in "The lifestyle" per se. I admit that and want to be clear to put that out front. However, and maybe it's just my lack of understanding or me just being to caught up in my own fetish fantasies, but I don't quite *get* this idea of "play"? And I'm not directing that at you specifically, in fact I appreciate you creating this thread. I honestly don't get this idea of realness being separate from play. I mean I understand it goes on, but it seems more akin to adults playing "Cowboys and Indians." I understand peopler have lives and responsibilities. Especially if they are ust getting into this kind of thing. But I guess in my mind my question is shouldn't - assuming one is free to do so (no kids etc) - seek to commit to one particuar assumed identity? I think most men, most Alpha males that is, or most your "Average Joe's," do give due respect to women dominants who privately and publicaly controll their men, dominate and drive them on all fours across floors. I say that to say this, those same men honoring that woman's strenght and proven conquring over a man (like conquering the Himalayas), seem from my limited experience, not prone to beat the shit out of the male sub being driven and controlled by their dominat woman. The woman in fact essentially becomes not just the buffer between them but the protector of the submissive male. It as if those guys would see it as a "disrespect" against the "streets" and the "game" to lay harming hands on that woman's earned property. I say this as someone who has once crawled on all fours across the floor for a woman who orderec me to do so in a house full of people (some gangsters). I was mocked by one man barking at me like a dog. I was, however, under the protection apparently, of the woman commanding me, proud as she was of her power over me. It was one of the most humiliating experiences I ever had.
|