alittleevil -> RE: What would you do If your Master said you both would now be vanilla (2/6/2009 3:49:50 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: ODschainedangel A subject came up amoung me and some others that got me to thinking about something. A slave is to obey and be pleasing to her Master. Her Master is to have the final say in all things. Given the truth of these things, what if a slave's Master decided he wished them to be vanilla? The two are also Husband and wife. Greetings Angel, What is actually meant by "vanilla?" No more "whips and chains", rough sex, and enthusiastic blow-jobs-on-demand? That would not bother me, i'm a malleable sort. I might miss it (and would most probably still deliver enthusiastic oral upon request), but my sexual preferences are not what defines/determines Master's sexual behavior now. No more 'ritual' or protocol? It would certainly take some time to adjust my behavior, but honestly, if no longer compelled to kneel, refrain from addressing Master by his given name, avoid furniture, etc., oh well. These things aren't done to amuse myself but because i am compelled. These sorts of outward manifestations and expressions of M/s often do wax and wane with other of life's circumstances, small (like being at a relative's house for the evening) and large (death, grief, illness). Or, does the man in question intend to utterly free her? From this point forward treat and engage with her as an autonomous, equal authority in their relationship and hold her to the expectations of such? That would be a problem for me. And, quite seriously, for the other person. Just as not every person is desirous of being and able to be enslaved, not every person is desirous of and able to be "free." Personally, i am quite bad at being a peer in an intimate relationship. I've tried. I was married. The other person, and myself, ended up miserable and in miserable personal and financial situations. I don't have the skills, the personality or the inclinations to have an equal authority in the decisions for a "couple", much less a household. "A slave" is who i am, fundamentally deep down to the core of me. A lot of time and facilitation would be needed for me to function well as a peer companion sort of wife. If a man were undergoing such a severe personal upheaval that he could no longer invest himself and the energy needed to keep a woman as a slave, he's unlikely to have the time, energy and motivation needed to develop a functional, never mind fulfilling, marriage with her. But all that begs the question of "Why" this happened in the first place. Even if Master and i had never heard the words "master" and "slave" or applied them to who and what we are, we would be very much the same together because he doesn't "dominate" and i don't "submit" as conscious actions/choices all day long: we just are...what we are. His wants and expectations for the woman in his life would be only minutely different than if he had not actively sought a woman to enslave. I hope your friends something out without a painful disaster for all concerned. Best, aj
|
|
|
|