HeavansKeeper -> RE: Can you trust again.. (2/10/2009 10:43:54 AM)
|
Lockit, I'm not sure if your response was directly to me or the "general you." I agree that this situation needs a change, and that it isn't fair to the slave to bear all the painful changes. Failing to change who you are to fit the fancies of someone else is not failing them. Also, I agree that if one is willing to bear the responsibility and joy of owning another, one must be centered first. My traditional advice for relationships is to not sink a ship because the hull is scratched, but take a moment to see if there's structural damage. More directly, nine years is a long time to be together. I'm sure there was more good than bad, even with three counts of adultery. I know I'm saying something something unpopular and potentially dangerous. I'm merely suggesting the possibility that the three indiscretions are the same problem, which was never dealt with. Promising "ok, next time I'll be honest and open" without making any change to why one couldn't be honest and open the first time is a bandaid. Bandaids don't fix broken bones. See if there's an amicable solution to the problem. Maybe there is, maybe there isn't. If Subcassie doesn't want to find a solution, then she loses her master. (Which might, sadly, be a good thing). If she's willing to dig into the root of the problem and make a solution, not just a promise of change, then there's a 50-50* chance of staying together. (Which, again, may not be such a good thing). Assuming the goal is to fix the relationship, 50% chance is better than 0% chance. Assuming the goal is the escape abuse (and the relationship constitutes abuse) then the 100% is better than the 50%. *When odds are unknown, setting them to 50-50 makes gives the statistician the same odds of being right as wrong, which is the best we can hope for in a guessing game.
|
|
|
|