BANK CEO'S FLOGGED !! (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


MsFlutter -> BANK CEO'S FLOGGED !! (2/11/2009 10:28:13 AM)

LOL.. sure caught MY attention 




cjan -> RE: BANK CEO'S FLOGGED !! (2/11/2009 11:40:45 AM)

perv ! The country is going down da terlet and all you can think of is getting your cookies...disgusting.




Vendaval -> RE: BANK CEO'S FLOGGED !! (2/11/2009 2:19:20 PM)

Well, gosh darn it.  No photos!  haruumphh!  pfftt!   [sm=rantint.gif]




rulemylife -> RE: BANK CEO'S FLOGGED !! (2/11/2009 4:40:34 PM)

If anyone actually read this article, there was something pretty interesting:

When Treasury first announced its capital injection plan in October, JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo reportedly scoffed at the idea that they should take government funds.

But they were given little choice as former Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson hoped that providing capital to all of the nation's top banks would keep credit flowing and prevent the economy from deteriorating any further.

JP Morgan Chase and Wells Fargo were two of the three banks that received the largest shares of TARP funds at $25 billion each.

So the Bush Treasury Dept. forced the banks to accept $50 billion that they neither felt they needed nor wanted. 





corysub -> RE: BANK CEO'S FLOGGED !! (2/11/2009 4:52:28 PM)

Yea..the bank CEO's were flogged by their fellow pirates sitting up there in the peanut gallery...people like Chairman Barney Frank, cute Maxine and others who contributed nothing to the conversation but were instrumental in creating the problems we are seeing today. 
I think the CEO's were all guilty of "greed" and stupidity in risk management by allowing people in the fixed income area to "bet the balance sheet" with 30 to35-1 leverage and were paid millions of dollars on earnings resulting from a giant ponzi scheme.  There should be a "clawback" of some of that income on steroids they received.  There also should be a hearing on Congress and the amount of lobby money, political contributions, speaking stipends, that people like Frank and others received from FannieMae and Freddie Mac...and the local banks that received TARP money under the radar.

As I said initially, CEO's were flogged by their fellow pirates on the ship.  No wonder the popularity of Congress is single digit.




OneMoreWaste -> RE: BANK CEO'S FLOGGED !! (2/11/2009 5:51:08 PM)

Meh. Get back to me when they're being fed feet-first into a wood chipper. [>:]




honeygirl -> RE: BANK CEO'S FLOGGED !! (2/11/2009 6:44:07 PM)

Precisely! Some financial institutions were actually given little or no choice in the matter. And the current rules (that allegedly might be waived soon) around when/how the money can be repaid make it extremely challenging for companies to re-pay the money even if they do have more than sufficient cash on hand right now. Outrage and snarkiness from certain members of Congress seems extremely phony and self-serving to me.


quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

If anyone actually read this article, there was something pretty interesting:

When Treasury first announced its capital injection plan in October, JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo reportedly scoffed at the idea that they should take government funds.

But they were given little choice as former Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson hoped that providing capital to all of the nation's top banks would keep credit flowing and prevent the economy from deteriorating any further.

JP Morgan Chase and Wells Fargo were two of the three banks that received the largest shares of TARP funds at $25 billion each.

So the Bush Treasury Dept. forced the banks to accept $50 billion that they neither felt they needed nor wanted. 







Vendaval -> RE: BANK CEO'S FLOGGED !! (2/11/2009 8:28:40 PM)

Fast Reply -  There was video on the evening news tonight of this and it was fun watching the 8 bank CEO's squirming in their seats and groveling in way of an apology.  The next step should be tarring and feathering and chasing them through the streets.  [sm=wife.gif]




TheUtopian -> RE: BANK CEO'S FLOGGED !! (2/11/2009 11:07:36 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Vendaval

Fast Reply -  There was video on the evening news tonight of this and it was fun watching the 8 bank CEO's squirming in their seats and groveling in way of an apology.  The next step should be tarring and feathering and chasing them through the streets.  [sm=wife.gif]


Ha! I'd love to see the day when it becomes '' pure sport '' to run up and sucker punch one of these shysters and knock all their front teeth out.

I consider these banking pukes to be far worse than their brethren from the petroleum industry and military industrial complex. 

I can't even watch them speak on youtube without fantasizing about being isolated with them in an elevator, and kicking the shit out em', running away as soon as the door opens and them never learning my identity.







- R






corysub -> RE: BANK CEO'S FLOGGED !! (2/12/2009 5:49:47 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheUtopian

quote:

ORIGINAL: Vendaval

Fast Reply -  There was video on the evening news tonight of this and it was fun watching the 8 bank CEO's squirming in their seats and groveling in way of an apology.  The next step should be tarring and feathering and chasing them through the streets.  [sm=wife.gif]


Ha! I'd love to see the day when it becomes '' pure sport '' to run up and sucker punch one of these shysters and knock all their front teeth out.

I consider these banking pukes to be far worse than their brethren from the petroleum industry and military industrial complex. 

I can't even watch them speak on youtube without fantasizing about being isolated with them in an elevator, and kicking the shit out em', running away as soon as the door opens and them never learning my identity.

- R


Great fantasy...I would join in too and hope the elevator was big enough to include Barney Frank, Maxine Waters, Cumo, and all the other politicians who were in the hip pocket of FannieMae and FreddieMac, who looked the other way while warnings were given by regulators about balance sheet risks being taken by those GSE's that led to the debacle we are facing today.  Those bankers that make you "puke" were only able to bet their balance sheets with outrageous leverage, package mortgages purchased from banks into MBS's, and sell them to instituions who were looking for above average returns.  The road to perdition was paved by politicians legislating a social agenda for the country. Those greedy bankers would not have been able to consumate those bad deals if Congress had not told them too do so...loosened the regulatory bindings, and looked the other way when it came to oversight!   No one has a "right" to own a home....it has to be earned!  And now all of us are expected to bail out people who ate more than they could chew in loans, and look the other way and not blame the liberal political elite. 




rulemylife -> RE: BANK CEO'S FLOGGED !! (2/12/2009 6:28:51 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: corysub


Great fantasy...I would join in too and hope the elevator was big enough to include Barney Frank, Maxine Waters, Cumo, and all the other politicians who were in the hip pocket of FannieMae and FreddieMac, who looked the other way while warnings were given by regulators about balance sheet risks being taken by those GSE's that led to the debacle we are facing today.  Those bankers that make you "puke" were only able to bet their balance sheets with outrageous leverage, package mortgages purchased from banks into MBS's, and sell them to instituions who were looking for above average returns.  The road to perdition was paved by politicians legislating a social agenda for the country. Those greedy bankers would not have been able to consumate those bad deals if Congress had not told them too do so...loosened the regulatory bindings, and looked the other way when it came to oversight!   No one has a "right" to own a home....it has to be earned!  And now all of us are expected to bail out people who ate more than they could chew in loans, and look the other way and not blame the liberal political elite. 


McClatchy Washington Bureau | 10/12/2008 | Private sector loans ...Oct 12, 2008 ... Private sector loans, not Fannie or Freddie, triggered crisis ... "I don't remember a clarion call that said Fannie and Freddie are a ...
www.mcclatchydc.com/251/story/53802.html - 52k


WASHINGTON — As the economy worsens and Election Day approaches, a conservative campaign that blames the global financial crisis on a government push to make housing more affordable to lower-class Americans has taken off on talk radio and e-mail.

Commentators say that's what triggered the stock market meltdown and the freeze on credit. They've specifically targeted the mortgage finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which the federal government seized on Sept. 6, contending that lending to poor and minority Americans caused Fannie's and Freddie's financial problems.

Federal housing data reveal that the charges aren't true, and that the private sector, not the government or government-backed companies, was behind the soaring subprime lending at the core of the crisis.

Subprime lending offered high-cost loans to the weakest borrowers during the housing boom that lasted from 2001 to 2007. Subprime lending was at its height from 2004 to 2006.

Federal Reserve Board data show that:
  • More than 84 percent of the subprime mortgages in 2006 were issued by private lending institutions.

  • Private firms made nearly 83 percent of the subprime loans to low- and moderate-income borrowers that year.

  • Only one of the top 25 subprime lenders in 2006 was directly subject to the housing law that's being lambasted by conservative critics.




corysub -> RE: BANK CEO'S FLOGGED !! (2/12/2009 6:48:47 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: corysub


Great fantasy...I would join in too and hope the elevator was big enough to include Barney Frank, Maxine Waters, Cumo, and all the other politicians who were in the hip pocket of FannieMae and FreddieMac, who looked the other way while warnings were given by regulators about balance sheet risks being taken by those GSE's that led to the debacle we are facing today.  Those bankers that make you "puke" were only able to bet their balance sheets with outrageous leverage, package mortgages purchased from banks into MBS's, and sell them to instituions who were looking for above average returns.  The road to perdition was paved by politicians legislating a social agenda for the country. Those greedy bankers would not have been able to consumate those bad deals if Congress had not told them too do so...loosened the regulatory bindings, and looked the other way when it came to oversight!   No one has a "right" to own a home....it has to be earned!  And now all of us are expected to bail out people who ate more than they could chew in loans, and look the other way and not blame the liberal political elite. 


McClatchy Washington Bureau | 10/12/2008 | Private sector loans ...Oct 12, 2008 ... Private sector loans, not Fannie or Freddie, triggered crisis ... "I don't remember a clarion call that said Fannie and Freddie are a ...
www.mcclatchydc.com/251/story/53802.html - 52k


WASHINGTON — As the economy worsens and Election Day approaches, a conservative campaign that blames the global financial crisis on a government push to make housing more affordable to lower-class Americans has taken off on talk radio and e-mail.

Commentators say that's what triggered the stock market meltdown and the freeze on credit. They've specifically targeted the mortgage finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which the federal government seized on Sept. 6, contending that lending to poor and minority Americans caused Fannie's and Freddie's financial problems.

Federal housing data reveal that the charges aren't true, and that the private sector, not the government or government-backed companies, was behind the soaring subprime lending at the core of the crisis.

Subprime lending offered high-cost loans to the weakest borrowers during the housing boom that lasted from 2001 to 2007. Subprime lending was at its height from 2004 to 2006.

Federal Reserve Board data show that:
  • More than 84 percent of the subprime mortgages in 2006 were issued by private lending institutions.

  • Private firms made nearly 83 percent of the subprime loans to low- and moderate-income borrowers that year.

  • Only one of the top 25 subprime lenders in 2006 was directly subject to the housing law that's being lambasted by conservative critics.




Thank you for the link.  It proves the point others have made that journalists with an agenda can fool the masses who don't do homework.  It shows how you can fool people with facts and figures that have no relevance to an issue.  I think we can agree that Delta Airlines today will have more airplanes in the air than the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad!  That's about what the story you linked to proves...and I agree.

It's true that most mortgages are originated by banks and not FannieMae and FreddieMac.  Excuse me, but who do you think than buys those mortgages from the banks?  Who do you think was chartered to provide money to grease the credit rails..? Guess..!  Guess again!  Correct..FannieMae and FreddieMac who, together had portfolios that represeented half the mortgages in the United States.  That was why they were formed...to expedite credit for home purchase.  However, regulators allowed the banks to write loans that were not secure..loans with no money down, no income checks, heck in Ohio you didn't have to be alive..with mortgages given to dead people!  And who were the Congresspeople who attacked OFEO when they came with a negative report on FNM and FRE.....yep...Maxine and Barney...sounds like a vaudville act...

Ack..what's the use...it's like trying to argue religion...believe what you want to believe...and ignore the facts.  By the way...this discussion is all going to be mute in a few days as the market crashes when the "President" signs the Pelosi Democrat Fibulous Bill"




rulemylife -> RE: BANK CEO'S FLOGGED !! (2/12/2009 7:21:19 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: corysub

Thank you for the link.  It proves the point others have made that journalists with an agenda can fool the masses who don't do homework.  It shows how you can fool people with facts and figures that have no relevance to an issue.  I think we can agree that Delta Airlines today will have more airplanes in the air than the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad!  That's about what the story you linked to proves...and I agree.

It's true that most mortgages are originated by banks and not FannieMae and FreddieMac.  Excuse me, but who do you think than buys those mortgages from the banks?  Who do you think was chartered to provide money to grease the credit rails..? Guess..!  Guess again!  Correct..FannieMae and FreddieMac who, together had portfolios that represeented half the mortgages in the United States.



From the same article, which I'm sure is completely made up and false.  Afterall, you didn't hear it on a conservative talk show, so how could it be true?


Between 2004 and 2006, when subprime lending was exploding, Fannie and Freddie went from holding a high of 48 percent of the subprime loans that were sold into the secondary market to holding about 24 percent, according to data from Inside Mortgage Finance, a specialty publication. One reason is that Fannie and Freddie were subject to tougher standards than many of the unregulated players in the private sector who weakened lending standards, most of whom have gone bankrupt or are now in deep trouble.

During those same explosive three years, private investment banks — not Fannie and Freddie — dominated the mortgage loans that were packaged and sold into the secondary mortgage market. In 2005 and 2006, the private sector securitized almost two thirds of all U.S. mortgages, supplanting Fannie and Freddie, according to a number of specialty publications that track this data.





Owner59 -> RE: BANK CEO'S FLOGGED !! (2/12/2009 7:37:54 AM)

New BofA advert.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkek9JZWXjs




Owner59 -> RE: BANK CEO'S FLOGGED !! (2/12/2009 8:08:37 AM)

That Fanny or Freddy was what caused the credit break down isn`t true.That`s righty wingy spin.

This was a market wide breakdown,not just a few firms going under.

The spin that dems are culpable b/c they got money from freddy/fanny is laughable and misleads folks away from the guys who did this, Phil"Americans are whiners"Gramm and 6 long years of a neo-con controlled congress and 8 years of the empty hat.

Greenspan explains what went wrong.

Deregulation,credit swaps and derivatives,leveraging money at 30 to 1 and the fatally flawed concept that markets can manage and regulate themselves.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bAH-o7oEiyY&feature=related


To bad it took so much damage to finally get that sound regulation is as essential as oxygen.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R5lZPWNFizQ&feature=related       whole clip.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8oLHfKjiQew


Paul Krugman at least, tells the truth.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YwqcLbZJ4HA




rulemylife -> RE: BANK CEO'S FLOGGED !! (2/12/2009 8:29:01 AM)

 
quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

New BofA advert.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkek9JZWXjs


[sm=insane.gif]




TheUtopian -> RE: BANK CEO'S FLOGGED !! (2/12/2009 8:53:15 PM)

quote:

Great fantasy...I would join in too and hope the elevator was big enough to include Barney Frank, Maxine Waters, Cumo, and all the other politicians who were in the hip pocket of FannieMae and FreddieMac, who looked the other way while warnings were given by regulators about balance sheet risks being taken by those GSE's that led to the debacle we are facing today.  Those bankers that make you "puke" were only able to bet their balance sheets with outrageous leverage, package mortgages purchased from banks into MBS's, and sell them to instituions who were looking for above average returns.  The road to perdition was paved by politicians legislating a social agenda for the country. Those greedy bankers would not have been able to consumate those bad deals if Congress had not told them too do so...loosened the regulatory bindings, and looked the other way when it came to oversight!   No one has a "right" to own a home....it has to be earned!  And now all of us are expected to bail out people who ate more than they could chew in loans, and look the other way and not blame the liberal political elite. 



Dude - I'm going to have to start referring to you as '' Cory Levin '' {Marks Brother} because you sound a whole lot like him.

If you think for one second we're bailing out the banks because of Fanny or Freddy, or loans to poor folks who could not afford them to begin with - Then you're a whole lot less knowledgeable than originally thought.

And please my friend.....do not take the above slight as if it were delivered from some fat chomp from Chicago or scraggly long-haired goober from Indiana. I'm much better looking and a whole lot nicer guy than both of them. Really and Truly.





- R





corysub -> RE: BANK CEO'S FLOGGED !! (2/12/2009 11:02:54 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: corysub

Thank you for the link.  It proves the point others have made that journalists with an agenda can fool the masses who don't do homework.  It shows how you can fool people with facts and figures that have no relevance to an issue.  I think we can agree that Delta Airlines today will have more airplanes in the air than the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad!  That's about what the story you linked to proves...and I agree.

It's true that most mortgages are originated by banks and not FannieMae and FreddieMac.  Excuse me, but who do you think than buys those mortgages from the banks?  Who do you think was chartered to provide money to grease the credit rails..? Guess..!  Guess again!  Correct..FannieMae and FreddieMac who, together had portfolios that represeented half the mortgages in the United States.



From the same article, which I'm sure is completely made up and false.  Afterall, you didn't hear it on a conservative talk show, so how could it be true?


Between 2004 and 2006, when subprime lending was exploding, Fannie and Freddie went from holding a high of 48 percent of the subprime loans that were sold into the secondary market to holding about 24 percent, according to data from Inside Mortgage Finance, a specialty publication. One reason is that Fannie and Freddie were subject to tougher standards than many of the unregulated players in the private sector who weakened lending standards, most of whom have gone bankrupt or are now in deep trouble.

During those same explosive three years, private investment banks — not Fannie and Freddie — dominated the mortgage loans that were packaged and sold into the secondary mortgage market. In 2005 and 2006, the private sector securitized almost two thirds of all U.S. mortgages, supplanting Fannie and Freddie, according to a number of specialty publications that track this data.




So the point is that the GSE's "cut back" on their sub-prime mortgage portfolio as a percentage of the total..or they "wrote off" sub-prime loans, took major losses which cut the percentage to 24%!

Is that what happened?  Interesting year you cite..2006.  Could it be that just possibly the "criminal investigation" and "conviction" in 2006 of FannieMae into the "cooking of the books" fraud, and through "misapplications of generally accepted accounting rules" . and having to restate "earnings" and pay a $400 million FINE might have something to do with the cut back in the sub-prime portfolio rather than astutue risk management.  Gimme a break! The GSE's failed in their responsibiliy, lost billions of dollars and forced the seizing up of the mortgage market when their ability to support the market, as is their charter, led to the collapse of the market.

                     http://www.sec.gov/news/testimony/2006/ts061506cc.htm
                        

Yea..I guess it was the "prudent" porfoliio management at FannieMae that contributed to the shares trading from $70.00 a share to about $0.70 a share! 

                 http://www.marketwatch.com/tools/quotes/intchart.asp?symb=FNM&time=12&freq=1&comp=&compidx=aaaaa%7E0&compind=&uf=0&ma=&maval=&lf=1&lf2=&lf3=&type=2&size=1&txtstyle=&style=&submitted=true&intflavor=basic&origurl=%2Ftools%2Fquotes%2Fintchart.asp

Edited to add some pretty colors.




4u2spoil -> RE: BANK CEO'S FLOGGED !! (2/12/2009 11:34:09 PM)

Fannie and Freddie had some role, but Wall St had a bigger one. A lot of these "toxic assets" were invented by guys at investment banks looking to get as much short term gain as they could. But no matter how many bows you put on manure, you're still left with a piece of s--t.

Washington holds responsibility in so far as them allowing the banks to do this, and some consumers as well, but it wasn't the greed of a few poor people who couldn't afford homes that spread the fire. The greed of bankers who wanted to afford a bigger home in the Hamptons, their favorite ski resort or island are the primary players. They went beyond the typical securities Fannie and Freddie dealt with and invented all kinds of exotic options based on debt based on debt based on real estate.

Sadly, they were so prolific with their greed that allowing them to fail could bring down the entire foundation, instead of just the shaky top layers. It will take a few decades, but eventually people will forget this like they forgot the Great Depression and start to whittle away regulation because they think business has evolved, and history will repeat itself.




NeedToUseYou -> RE: BANK CEO'S FLOGGED !! (2/13/2009 7:50:37 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

New BofA advert.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkek9JZWXjs


Bank of America was one of the Banks that wasn't significantly exposed to the subprime problem in the beginning and wouldn't have been hurt much if it had not changed anything. However, Ken Lewis, apparently has aspirations for Bank Of America that have endangered it, by buying companies that are highly exposed to it. Countrywide, and Lynch, have effectively turned it into being right in the same boat as every big bank if not more endangered on the face of it.

Ken Lewis and his big plans are solely responsible for at least 20 dollars of lost stock value. However, if BOA didn't buy Countrywide, and Lynch who knows what would have happened. My personal opinion is that there are some kind of private government deal going on. As the Lynch deal went through on ONE WEEKEND of going over their books. That's it. For a company to go from conservative in its dealings, to buying up risky assets like a stoned teenager in a taco bell, indicates that something must have happened that probably will only be forthcoming once this is over with.

But Bank of America isn't responsible for the subprime mess, they just bought it afterwards. LOL.




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
5.859375E-02