perverseangelic
Posts: 2625
Joined: 2/2/2004 From: Davis, Ca Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Wildfleurs Well what is confusing is that you are a pro-sub. I mean you are a pro but you aren't looking for clients? I suspect they think that means that you are available. Also you have checked off that you are actively seeking all of these categories: Chances are people that contact you think they fall into any of those groups, most notably "Online Romance." On top of that you clearly say that you and your owner are looking for individuals and/or couples for play. I'm confused - why wouldn't people contact you? C~ Shoot. I didn't actually realize I'd clicked off "online romance." I shall fix that. Thank you for pointing it out. I'm actually working on -becoming- a prosub, but I need to find a place to do scenes. I should probably just take that bit out all-together, but I -am- looking and I'd rather not totally cut out all my options. I =am= available. And I =love= being contacted. I just get sick of people ignoring the fact that I'm with my owner most firmly. It isn't the contact I object to. It's the assumption that I'm single and the accusations when I say I'm not. quote:
Could it be the photo? Most don't bother to read the profile, after all that would tell them you aren't seeking. So, the ones responding to you aren't reading it. Remove the photo and get less e-mails, simple really. But we -are- activly looking. And I -do- want to attract people. Again, it isn't getting mail, it's the question as to whether my profile makes it clear that I'm with someone, as my primary. I guess what I was complaining about wasn't being contacted, or being approached for possible realtionships. We -are- looking. It's just that I'm approached as a me, not as a we. I wanted to make sure the "we" part is clearly indicated. LA-- Thank you, I'm gonna go try to pare down and c&p some of your transalations. i appreciate. I am wordy by nature, and tend to prefer adding rather than refining. I appreciate the help.
< Message edited by perverseangelic -- 1/17/2006 9:34:25 PM >
_____________________________
~in the begining it is always dark~
|