RE: Clinton believes planting seeds of bad economy isn't his fault (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


lusciouslips19 -> RE: Clinton believes planting seeds of bad economy isn't his fault (2/17/2009 10:29:39 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterShake69

the cry of racism effects both republicans and democrats.  But its only democrats using that as a weapon.
No republican could have gotten welfare reform done without the racism charge being used against them.  However a democrat can do it without the attack.

Oh and Obamas attack was against Bill Clinton not hillary.  Just tha it hurt the clinton campaign.  SO much for hope and change from Obama.  Hes just more of the same..typical politician.



So you are disagreeing with your own arguments. Crying race is not a democratic thing. Its a RACE thing. Maybe people would rathr elect a black president than a white women because they are more sexist than they are racist when faced with both?



Everyone has their own weapons. Republicans will use whatever they have on hand as will democtats.




MasterShake69 -> RE: Clinton believes planting seeds of bad economy isn't his fault (2/17/2009 11:12:08 AM)

its a very rare attack by democrats on democrats.
usually its done against republicans by democrats

you denied that such race card attacks took place and i used an example of Bill CLinton being called a racist by Obama.

quote:

ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterShake69

the cry of racism effects both republicans and democrats.  But its only democrats using that as a weapon.
No republican could have gotten welfare reform done without the racism charge being used against them.  However a democrat can do it without the attack.

Oh and Obamas attack was against Bill Clinton not hillary.  Just tha it hurt the clinton campaign.  SO much for hope and change from Obama.  Hes just more of the same..typical politician.



So you are disagreeing with your own arguments. Crying race is not a democratic thing. Its a RACE thing. Maybe people would rathr elect a black president than a white women because they are more sexist than they are racist when faced with both?



Everyone has their own weapons. Republicans will use whatever they have on hand as will democtats.




rulemylife -> RE: Clinton believes planting seeds of bad economy isn't his fault (2/17/2009 11:29:50 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterShake69

we are both right and wrong.

our national debt never went to zero.

what occured in 2000?  the year before bush took office?  the tech bubble burst.

the TECH BOOM BUBBLE produced 2 years where we took in more money in then we spent.


You're right the national debt never went to zero, but then it couldn't have been realistically expected to in eight years.

We were running budget surpluses though, which was a step in the right direction and those surpluses could have been used to begin reducing that debt.

When Bush came in he decided to use those surpluses to reward his wealthy supporters in the form of tax cuts and promote an ideological argument in favor of Reagan's "trickle down economics".

We were told returning those surpluses to the taxpayers would produce an even greater amount of tax revenue by stimulating business and private investment.

Yet, the same people that support this line of thinking turn the concept on its head and use it to dismiss the surpluses in Clinton's last two years as somehow fraudulent.

Yes, the economy was doing well, thanks in part to the tech bubble, which in turn increased tax revenues.  Their is nothing "smoke-and-mirrors" about that. 

Bush had the same benefit of a good economy for most of his tenure, thanks to the housing bubble, yet he ran consistent deficits and more than doubled the national debt during his time in office.




Irishknight -> RE: Clinton believes planting seeds of bad economy isn't his fault (2/17/2009 1:10:32 PM)

An economy with a steadily shrinking market of jobs that provide a wage above the poverty level cannot support itself.  Clinton started the shrinkage.  Bush continued to ignore that there was a problem with these so called "fair trade" deals that are driving America into poverty.  They are both at fault.  Both are too chickenshit to man up to their mistakes.




blacksword404 -> RE: Clinton believes planting seeds of bad economy isn't his fault (2/17/2009 1:29:06 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

Yup,just like you and me,he`s human,ie,not a magician,psychic,tarot card reader or prophet.

The only one`s who really knew about this were the perps and the cops who supposed to oversee things,the bushies.

Now we gotta deal with their mess.

You think Obama`s going to listen to a bunch of whiners complain when the health of our financial house is failing?!

We`ll just clean it up and ask the cons to step aside.They don`t even have to help and no thanks is neccessary from them.



So if it's your party it's a minor mistake, he is only human, he is no mind reader? But if it's the other party they are evil and corrupt and had to have done it on purpose? I don't give a fuck about either party but you have a severe bias if you truly believe what you say. Do you actually listen to yourself sometimes?




blacksword404 -> RE: Clinton believes planting seeds of bad economy isn't his fault (2/17/2009 1:46:15 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterShake69

I agree.
But the cry of racism even stoped Bill Clinton.  Thats why Obama beat Hillary.

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterShake69

The best of intentions often have initially unforeseen consequences. However when the danger became apparent Bush fought to change things but he didn't fight hard enough.
Republicans are too fearful of Democrats using the race card.



So to summarize, Republicans are wusses and George Bush set the wuss standard.

Yeah, I can see that.

Good call!




So you are disagreeing with your own arguments. Crying race is not a democratic thing. Its a RACE thing. Maybe people would rathr elect a black president than a white women because they are more sexist than they are racist when faced with both?


Or maybe it was stupid as hell to run the potentially first black president against the potentially first woman president. Why the hell would you run your two best horses against each other in the same race? You run them separately and you win both races. Not against each other.




MasterShake69 -> RE: Clinton believes planting seeds of bad economy isn't his fault (2/17/2009 5:10:26 PM)

actually the tax cuts produced more revenues into the economy...just the costs of the war wiped it out.


quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterShake69

we are both right and wrong.

our national debt never went to zero.

what occured in 2000?  the year before bush took office?  the tech bubble burst.

the TECH BOOM BUBBLE produced 2 years where we took in more money in then we spent.


You're right the national debt never went to zero, but then it couldn't have been realistically expected to in eight years.

We were running budget surpluses though, which was a step in the right direction and those surpluses could have been used to begin reducing that debt.

When Bush came in he decided to use those surpluses to reward his wealthy supporters in the form of tax cuts and promote an ideological argument in favor of Reagan's "trickle down economics".

We were told returning those surpluses to the taxpayers would produce an even greater amount of tax revenue by stimulating business and private investment.

Yet, the same people that support this line of thinking turn the concept on its head and use it to dismiss the surpluses in Clinton's last two years as somehow fraudulent.

Yes, the economy was doing well, thanks in part to the tech bubble, which in turn increased tax revenues.  Their is nothing "smoke-and-mirrors" about that. 

Bush had the same benefit of a good economy for most of his tenure, thanks to the housing bubble, yet he ran consistent deficits and more than doubled the national debt during his time in office.




lronitulstahp -> RE: Clinton believes planting seeds of bad economy isn't his fault (2/17/2009 5:20:21 PM)

quote:

Everyone has their own weapons. Republicans will use whatever they have on hand as will democrats.
What's up with all the partisan posts, then????? 




Owner59 -> RE: Clinton believes planting seeds of bad economy isn't his fault (2/17/2009 9:01:42 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterShake69

the cry of racism effects both republicans and democrats.  But its only democrats using that as a weapon.
No republican could have gotten welfare reform done without the racism charge being used against them.  However a democrat can do it without the attack.

Oh and Obamas attack was against Bill Clinton not hillary.  Just tha it hurt the clinton campaign.  SO much for hope and change from Obama.  Hes just more of the same..typical politician.



So you are disagreeing with your own arguments. Crying race is not a democratic thing. Its a RACE thing. Maybe people would rathr elect a black president than a white women because they are more sexist than they are racist when faced with both?




This is one smart cookie..

Very clever question and to the point,luscious.




faithfulfemme -> RE: Clinton believes planting seeds of bad economy isn't his fault (2/17/2009 9:39:52 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: AmrasL

I'm not American, actually I'm from Western Europe.


Why I bring this up though in this discussion, is because its also stated in the documentary that under Clinton, the US economy had never been better. There was no national debt, as a mater a fact, the US had money to spare. It is also pointed out, that under George Bush, the US started building up a national debt again, and this one became higher then ever. Its that national debt, that destroyed the US economy.
Honestly, taking that fact into account, I don't think Bill Clinton is to blame.

The Americans now say they didn't saw it coming, I find that a very amusing comment. Dating back until 2002, students in my homeland were talking about the fact that the US was slowly destroying their economy with the wars that were going on, and the fact that fighting terrorism seemed so much more important then looking after your economy (George Bush always seemed better in simple black and white warfare and powerful statements then making a good policy on anything). And then in 2005, this documentary was made, and at the end of last year, a lot of the events predicted in that documentary happened.



It was during the first term of Bush when his administration began to pile up all that massive National Debt that this recession started.  However, to keep from being blamed for causing a recession, what his administration did was to begin printing more money.  Printing more dollars is a good thing if there are places for it to be spent.  But the only markets for all that cash floating around was the housing markets.  Not a good thing when there is only one place open to absorb that amount of cash.
 
There was so much money available for folx to buy houses with that anyone and everyone could get a loan.  The rest is history, and here we are looking at something that might become so much more than just a recession......
 
There was a saying when i was much younger that i never really understoon until now......"When the going gets tough, the tough go shopping".  Japan has been in a serious recession since the early to mid 90s, and it's mostly because the japanese housewife and husband have shut down their spending, thus keeping the economy in a recessive state.  i just heard on the world news day before yesterday that their economy has taken yet another drop, 12.5%, from the year before.  Seems the worse things get over there, the less people take out of their wallets and spend, and then that causes things to get even worse and the less folx spend, ad nauseum.....
 
If we Americans don't let go of our purse strings just a little, not going overboard, mind you, but spending a bit more that we are right now, we'll be mimicking the japanese with our economy getting less and less productive, with more and more layoffs, causing less and less production, causing more and more layoffs, and we'll never get out of this mess.
 
It has always been the American consumers, with their spending habits, who have pulled this country out of any recession we've been in, with the exception, i think, of WWII, and it's not going to be any different this time.  Spending is the only way we're going to get out of this one, too.
 
We've all got to loosen up the purse strings.....just a bit....take that $13 dollars you're going to get each week in your paycheck, add a $20 to it, and go buy something.  You think i'm kidding here?.....Go look up our economic history.....
 
 
 
edited for typoitis....




Hippiekinkster -> RE: Clinton believes planting seeds of bad economy isn't his fault (2/17/2009 10:00:29 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Irishknight

He should man up and accept his portion of the blame.  He signed away the jobs when he signed NAFTA.  He is partially to blame for the mess this country is in at this time. 
Of course, taking responsibility for his actions has never been Bill's strong suit.  That would be taking advantage of young woman or getting himself out of rape charges.
I agree, and I'm farther left than even Alumbrado said he was. [8D]  NAFTA has been a total disaster.

I remember back around 98 or so, my ex and I were in Laredo, in a hotel right on the river, right at the main crossing, watching all the trucks. At least twice as many trucks were coming north as going south. NAFTA, and the Maquilladoras, have been a disaster for both countries. (read about the pollution the maquilladoras caused along the border.)

The only way Mexico will pull itself out of the oligarchy it finds itself caught in is through strong Trade Unions. And there will be a lot of bloodshed, because the military is owned by the rich. As is the US military, after a fashion.




Hippiekinkster -> RE: Clinton believes planting seeds of bad economy isn't his fault (2/17/2009 10:04:57 PM)

MasterShake: "actually the tax cuts produced more revenues into the economy...just the costs of the war wiped it out."

Prove it. 




Hippiekinkster -> RE: Clinton believes planting seeds of bad economy isn't his fault (2/17/2009 10:20:15 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterShake69

One of the main reasons why we went into Iraq other then the belief of WMD was a side benefit.  If the Iraq experiment was successful and they were to prosper.  By creating an Arab democracy in the heart of the middle east it would cause internal problems with all its neighbors.   Those problems would be from people in places like Iran, Saudi Arabia ect to seek creating a real democracy in their nations. 
The belief is democracy's do not fight democracy's.    If this created a reverse domino theory where nations became democratic.  Then the problems we have with IRAN would no longer exist.  The proliferation of nuclear tech would be halted.  It ultimately would be a net savings for the United States cause a conflict with Iran would be far more costly then the Iraq war.

Also soon we will no longer be supporting Iraq and they will be handling there own finances.  If we didn't invade Iraq we would have had to maintain the costs of the no fly zones and rapid deployment forces in Saudi Arabia forever.  

quote:

ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19

I would agree that the desire of some administrations to go to war is a big bad culprit. Warmongers like Haliburton make Trillions. Our country goes into debt because their yahoo cowboy lets control the world ways. Plus lots of people profited. I am sure many were friends and lobbyists of the President and those in office both democratic and republican. AFter all, lobbyists have funded campaigns. I am glad that now with the internet americans can get money to their candidate without them being owned by big business. I think its really cool that Obama got a lot his money through website donations from people .

This is hilarious. You really don't know why the Neocons wanted Iraq so badly, do you?

They wanted a "libertarian" "free-market" state with no economic barriers at all. No tarriffs, no duties, no taxes. A capitalist's dream.

http://www.harpers.org/archive/2004/09/0080197
http://www.tompaine.com/articles/adventure_capitalism.php
http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=11148
http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/issues/iraq/after/2003/0501economy.htm
IRAQ TO BECOME FREE MARKET LABORATORY:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20030921.wiraqecon0922/BNStory/Front/?query=iraq

I have lead you to knowledge. Read and learn.




rulemylife -> RE: Clinton believes planting seeds of bad economy isn't his fault (2/18/2009 4:22:24 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterShake69

actually the tax cuts produced more revenues into the economy...just the costs of the war wiped it out.



Obviously though, they did not produce enough revenue to keep yearly deficits from accumulating, which would tend to make one wonder about the validity of the theory.

And you are forgetting that Bush played games with the budgets to purposely exclude war funding. 

The costs of the war added to the national debt but never were reflected in the budget, the costs being sent to Congress as separate appropriations bills.

So the costs of the war had nothing to do with the budget deficits because they were not included in the budget..




Jmv0405 -> RE: Clinton believes planting seeds of bad economy isn't his fault (2/18/2009 6:06:24 AM)

Human beings are so fucking useless.

Sorry about the bluntness, but who the fuck cares who's responsible.

Who's got the plan to get us out.

Looks like Obama to me.




MasterShake69 -> RE: Clinton believes planting seeds of bad economy isn't his fault (2/18/2009 7:20:46 AM)

Once again you two are missing the point.  It doesn't matter if a policy actually targets African Americans.  More whites were effected by welfare reform then blacks. However that fact didn't stop the race card from being used against republicans.
Democrats have no problem with not only using the race card against republicans but at select times using it against there primary opponents.The most recent and well known example of the race card being used this past year was when Obama used it against Bill Clinton.  How is it racist saying that Obamas always being against the Iraq war a fairy tale? 
As long as a democrat doesn't face a primary opponent he could frequently use the N word without any political consequences.


now revisit my post #11 where i said.
-----
The best of intentions often have initially unforeseen consequences. However when the danger became apparent Bush fought to change things but he didn't fight hard enough.
Republicans are too fearful of Democrats using the race card.
----
interesting story about Mr Byrd ;)
http://www.capmag.com/article.asp?ID=383







quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

quote:

ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterShake69

the cry of racism effects both republicans and democrats.  But its only democrats using that as a weapon.
No republican could have gotten welfare reform done without the racism charge being used against them.  However a democrat can do it without the attack.

Oh and Obamas attack was against Bill Clinton not hillary.  Just tha it hurt the clinton campaign.  SO much for hope and change from Obama.  Hes just more of the same..typical politician.



So you are disagreeing with your own arguments. Crying race is not a democratic thing. Its a RACE thing. Maybe people would rathr elect a black president than a white women because they are more sexist than they are racist when faced with both?




This is one smart cookie..

Very clever question and to the point,luscious.




MasterShake69 -> RE: Clinton believes planting seeds of bad economy isn't his fault (2/18/2009 7:23:43 AM)

i believe the 2005 and 2006 numbers shows an increase in revenues.
Ill go check in a bit :)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hippiekinkster

MasterShake: "actually the tax cuts produced more revenues into the economy...just the costs of the war wiped it out."

Prove it. 





MasterShake69 -> RE: Clinton believes planting seeds of bad economy isn't his fault (2/18/2009 7:28:57 AM)

that's not what wall street thinks.
until obama gets his act together the rich are going to keep their money on the sidelines.  Without them this economy will not boom.  Plus with Obama talking down the economy as a way to inoculate himself from blame, it further erodes confidence in the economy.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jmv0405

Human beings are so fucking useless.

Sorry about the bluntness, but who the fuck cares who's responsible.

Who's got the plan to get us out.

Looks like Obama to me.




AmrasL -> RE: Clinton believes planting seeds of bad economy isn't his fault (2/18/2009 7:32:39 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: faithfulfemme

quote:

ORIGINAL: AmrasL

I'm not American, actually I'm from Western Europe.


Why I bring this up though in this discussion, is because its also stated in the documentary that under Clinton, the US economy had never been better. There was no national debt, as a mater a fact, the US had money to spare. It is also pointed out, that under George Bush, the US started building up a national debt again, and this one became higher then ever. Its that national debt, that destroyed the US economy.
Honestly, taking that fact into account, I don't think Bill Clinton is to blame.

The Americans now say they didn't saw it coming, I find that a very amusing comment. Dating back until 2002, students in my homeland were talking about the fact that the US was slowly destroying their economy with the wars that were going on, and the fact that fighting terrorism seemed so much more important then looking after your economy (George Bush always seemed better in simple black and white warfare and powerful statements then making a good policy on anything). And then in 2005, this documentary was made, and at the end of last year, a lot of the events predicted in that documentary happened.



It was during the first term of Bush when his administration began to pile up all that massive National Debt that this recession started.  However, to keep from being blamed for causing a recession, what his administration did was to begin printing more money.  Printing more dollars is a good thing if there are places for it to be spent.  But the only markets for all that cash floating around was the housing markets.  Not a good thing when there is only one place open to absorb that amount of cash.
 
There was so much money available for folx to buy houses with that anyone and everyone could get a loan.  The rest is history, and here we are looking at something that might become so much more than just a recession......
 
There was a saying when i was much younger that i never really understoon until now......"When the going gets tough, the tough go shopping".  Japan has been in a serious recession since the early to mid 90s, and it's mostly because the japanese housewife and husband have shut down their spending, thus keeping the economy in a recessive state.  i just heard on the world news day before yesterday that their economy has taken yet another drop, 12.5%, from the year before.  Seems the worse things get over there, the less people take out of their wallets and spend, and then that causes things to get even worse and the less folx spend, ad nauseum.....
 
If we Americans don't let go of our purse strings just a little, not going overboard, mind you, but spending a bit more that we are right now, we'll be mimicking the japanese with our economy getting less and less productive, with more and more layoffs, causing less and less production, causing more and more layoffs, and we'll never get out of this mess.
 
It has always been the American consumers, with their spending habits, who have pulled this country out of any recession we've been in, with the exception, i think, of WWII, and it's not going to be any different this time.  Spending is the only way we're going to get out of this one, too.
 
We've all got to loosen up the purse strings.....just a bit....take that $13 dollars you're going to get each week in your paycheck, add a $20 to it, and go buy something.  You think i'm kidding here?.....Go look up our economic history.....
 
 
 
edited for typoitis....



Yes you are quite right. When I moved to Asia, I noticed that a lot of people here are spending more money then in my european homeland. And government seemed to some extend encourage it. Shopping and eating out is everyone's hobby over here, it will also come as no surprise how many people  got jobs in shops, restaurants or foodcourts. Tourism is a big industry here as well, its easy money to receive money that originally came from a other country. However when people stop spending, the people who get their salary due to other people spending, will get less to spend.  Its a endless downwards spiral.

As long as people are spending, and other people earning its fine. "Money has to roll". And as long as money is rolling and circulating, its fine. But what happend in the US is that the Americans started spending money that they didn't have.
And if you spend money that you don't have, you are loaning either directly or indirectly. (And the thing is with a loan, you must pay it back someday)

Its a problem that was wisked away for a while, by printing new money and pumping it into the housing market, but also sell it to Asian nations. (And in return stimulate the asians by buying their cheap products).
However, as with any product, offer and demand, play a role, the higher the demand, and lower the offer, the more valuable a product is. However, with keeping on creating and selling dollars, the offers exceeds the demand more and more. Making your dollar less worth.

Yes, the recession could be halted a bit, and maybe turned around, if the Americans were to open their purses a bit, and spend a bit more, specially on American products on which American job pretend. Would be bad for the rest of the world though, their export would drop.




MasterShake69 -> RE: Clinton believes planting seeds of bad economy isn't his fault (2/18/2009 7:34:52 AM)

ok here it is

Treasury Secretary John Snow released this chart today, showing the growth in federal tax revenues since the 2003 Tax Act.
http://taxprof.typepad.com/.shared/image.html?/photos/uncategorized/revenue20growth.jpg

Now the left had no credibility regarding spending because in a few weeks in office they spent more then 7 years of Bush's 2 wars.




quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterShake69

i believe the 2005 and 2006 numbers shows an increase in revenues.
Ill go check in a bit :)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hippiekinkster

MasterShake: "actually the tax cuts produced more revenues into the economy...just the costs of the war wiped it out."

Prove it. 






Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.1103516