Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Men in Panties


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress >> RE: Men in Panties Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Men in Panties - 2/22/2009 6:45:28 PM   
Lockit


Posts: 11292
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: hardbodysub


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lockit

How is it that threads about panties... or submission/service submissive's turn into war and gun's?  Relating war and guns to bdsm or kink just doesn't seem to fit.


Women's panties always have a devastating effect on me.


Explosive eh? hehe

_____________________________

No matter how old a woman gets, some men will think she was born yesterday! ROFL... I love this place!


(in reply to hardbodysub)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: Men in Panties - 2/22/2009 7:08:34 PM   
Tavane


Posts: 131
Joined: 3/10/2008
Status: offline
hardbodysub: If a person has no realization that a powerful gun will recoil, then I can see him losing his balance, and needing to take a small step back to regain it, but that's the last time it will ever happen to him. He'll lean forward from then on, just a bit.

Shane is one of my favorite films, but does have the dubious distinction of being the first film where they used wires to pull back the little Southern guy when Jack Palance shot him from the porch. As a hunter, you'll know that guns don't knock back prey animals.They just fall, if it's a good shot. They are much sturdier than people, so don't have the rag doll effect as much, but they do have it if they are killed instantly. People are very weak animals, and two-legged, The shock of being hit with a rifle drops them, even if it doesn't kill them, but if they are only injured, they don't have the rag doll effect, and might not even go down, though a shot to an arm or leg which hits the bone will require an amputation. The bones will be shattered beyond repair. I shake my head at all these "flesh wounds" our film heroes get, with no problem. Those flesh wounds will rip out huge amounts of muscle, nerves, tendons, all of which is gone forever. You'll have huge indentations in your body forever, and will be disabled to some extent. I saw lots of guys after flesh wounds healed.

The noise is just beyond belief. In a film, a hand grenade isn't much. In real life, it's like a huge bomb went off not far away. The power is breathtaking. I was in mortars for awhile, and in films, we see guys running along and a mortar hits 15 feet away, and doesn't even bother them. In reality, a mortar can have a killing radius of 50 meters. That means that if it hits in the middle of a football field, almost everyone who is standing anywhere on that field is a potential dead person.

When you talk about power, there is the .50 BMG. That dwarfs all other (regularly used by soldiers) combat weapons. The energy is so immense that it's hard to find ballistic tables on it anywhere. I've fired them at lightly armored vehicles half a mile away, and they can rip right through them at that range. There is no defense to that weapon. It will go right through trees and concrete blocks to kill the enemy. The VC had twin .51 cal machine guns, and they were our worst nightmare.

Yet I don't think they would necessarily knock somebody back much. Theyd go right through him, blasting him apart. Every soldier is terrified of that weapon, and we have rifles which fire them now, notably the Barrett M107, which is standard military now for some snipers. They can take out targets from more than a mile away. Guys fire them without any recoil problems, though they are heavy, and have a muzzle brake which reduces the recoil.

I've never seen a man hit with one. We didn't have them in helicopters, or in our perimeter bunkers; just M-60's, M-16s, and M79 grenade launchers, and of course claymore mines set out in front of the bunker at least 20 yards.

The noise of war is just beyond belief. Shooting on a range is dangerous to your hearing. Shooting with everyone firing machine guns and/or M-16's on full automatic in a firefight is truly deafening and painful, and sometimes mini-guns and rockets going off. Like many things about war, you have to experience it to have any idea what it's like.

(in reply to OneMoreWaste)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: Men in Panties - 2/22/2009 7:16:58 PM   
ShaktiSama


Posts: 1674
Joined: 8/13/2007
Status: offline
My boykin looks dead sexy when barely restrained by the super-silky panties I bought for him at Victoria's Secret, but really he can't wear anything comfortably unless it's cut as a full brief. He's too big for the panties that look best on a girl.

_____________________________

"Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax and get used to the idea."
-- Robert A. Heinlein

(in reply to Tavane)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: Men in Panties - 2/22/2009 7:40:11 PM   
Tavane


Posts: 131
Joined: 3/10/2008
Status: offline
It is a bit off topic, but we tried to mix war and panties when we were in Vietnam, and when you are having sex, you have a weapon and there is hopefully an explosion at some point. In a submissive relationship you "surrender", and are "conquered" by a superior force. You have no defense to her attack, and she crushes you into submission and slavery with her own set of female weaponry. 

(in reply to Tavane)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: Men in Panties - 2/22/2009 8:36:42 PM   
Tavane


Posts: 131
Joined: 3/10/2008
Status: offline
Stella41B: I just read your post, and you are entitled to your opinions, but so am I. I didn't attack any person, and do find your kind of posting inconsistent with rational discussion in an attempt to learn. This "I'm offended that you think that" mentality which permeates society in these PC days is frankly rude and isn't going to gain any acceptance by rational people who would like to hear all points of view.

I'm not interested in posting a photo of me when I was 27, since that's  irrelevant to finding a person when I'm 61, and if I was 27, I'd only post one if I didn't care who knew I was a TG submissive. Everything I said is true. I'm not going to waste my time making up stories. I like to read fantasy stories, and could write one, but this is not the place for fiction. If I wanted to write a story, it would have a better ending than that.

I'll admit it sounds strange; which is why I posted it. I've seen prettier TGs than me in photos, but I've never met one, nor seen one who looks as much like a woman as I do. You can't tell in photos. You need to see a person close up in real life to examine what they are really like. I knew TS guys who hadn't even had electrolysis, but were on hormones. I couldn't believe that. It's the most important thing you can do, and makes all the difference, if you have feminine features. We notice the male facial hair immediately, even after a close shave, and often even with foundation, unless it's very thick. Mine was light and I had no problem passing with light foundation, but after electrolysis, your face is like a woman's, with many thousands of fine downy hairs which give it a soft appearance, like on a woman's face.

All men have some facial hair which needs to be shaved. When you have none, people see your face as feminine, and there is no way you can make your face look masculine again, since you can't grow a moustache, beard, or sideburns. We look at "everything" when we see a person, and automatically categorize that person as male or female. With me, they see very feminine features, no facial hair, arms, legs, and hands like a female, and I'm small and slender like a female, such that I'm too small to wear men's jackets, even though I'm 5'8" (or perhaps a bit shorter now, at my age). It just happened, with my life-long obsession to be feminine, and my natural assets.

I was on a fishing charter once with some friends, and a group of other guys were on the boat, and one of them started talking to me, and took my pole and put one of his lures on it, and told me to try that. I couldn't believe this, until I had the sudden realization that this was exactly what I'd do for a woman, and that this guy thought I was a woman. My buddies were calling me by my male name in conversations. Then I hooked a fish, and this guy said "She's got one!", and my worst fears were realized. I could hardly wait for that trip to be over. I was wearing jeans and a flannel shirt, and talking like a guy.

Another time I went to a specialist for a carpel tunnel problem, and was talking to him and his nurse, in my regular voice, and I have a man's name, and they set me up for a CAT Scan, and he left the room, and the nurse looked at me and said "I'm not going to ask you if you're  pregnant." I just stared at her in shock, and couldn't think of anything to say, so I just said, "No, I'm not pregnant."

I've had lots of experiences like that, though those two were ones which really shocked me. They had been examining my wrists, which are so small and feminine that I can see how it happened, but it still shocked me. Medical places do deal with all kinds of people, and so TG people are something they encounter, and it was apparent they thought I was a woman who lived and worked as a man. My hair is so short that I do get stared at sometimes. It's much easier when it's a bit longer, since then I don't get stared at, and I'm going to let it grow a bit, at least to cover part of my ears.  Yesterday at the grocery I had cat litter and a heavy package of Pepsi in the cart, and the checkout guy said he would scan those for me in the cart, so I'd not have to lift them to the self-checkout scanner. I've become kind of a slender older lady these days, and even young women will open doors for me sometimes. There is nothing I can do about it, though I find it kind of absurd. I'm much stronger than these women, not to mention that I'm the man, and they are the ones I should be opening doors for.

I'm certainly not prejudiced against TG people, whatever they do or believe. I just don't happen to agree with many of them. I was on some TG lists, and discussed it, and had one TS say, "I agree with you for most TSs, but not as regards me." I'm not speaking in a vacuum. I've known lots of these people, who had no reason to lie to me, and am one myself.

Believe what you want, but let others believe what they want, and post about it.

(in reply to Tavane)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: Men in Panties - 2/22/2009 9:18:27 PM   
chezzy71


Posts: 412
Joined: 4/19/2008
Status: offline
ok in my best sean penn as harvey milk impersonation"i am angry i am so angry because they bunch up in my ass".i can't wear them pffffffffft.

(in reply to Tavane)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: Men in Panties - 2/23/2009 12:28:24 AM   
Prinsexx


Posts: 4584
Joined: 8/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tavane

Stella41B: I just read your post, and you are entitled to your opinions, but so am I. I didn't attack any person, and do find your kind of posting inconsistent with rational discussion in an attempt to learn. This "I'm offended that you think that" mentality which permeates society in these PC days is frankly rude and isn't going to gain any acceptance by rational people who would like to hear all points of view.

.....................................
Believe what you want, but let others believe what they want, and post about it.


Forgive me, I don't think Stella is actually saying you should not post or indeed do nor have the right to do so. I also feel from eperience, there aren't many human beings on this planet who are more open minded and tolerant than Stella.
So I would invite you to read through the two statements you have made above...the first at the beginning of your post and the last statement at the end.
They are entirely paradoxical, incomparable and untenable in my opinion. Buy you obviously have the right to be so.
And posting rights are somewhat off topic of the thread I feel.



_____________________________

Owner of asterion

Metawhore.... the sound of a metaphore when gagged
Free woman
Resident thread finisher
To my stalker:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LN2lP_7J7GI&feature=fvwrel

(in reply to Tavane)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: Men in Panties - 2/23/2009 3:05:01 AM   
TranceTara


Posts: 152
Joined: 12/22/2008
Status: offline
quote:

Tavane

We know that erotic pleasure can motivate people to do almost anything. I can't think of anything else which would possibly motivate a person to want to be a slave for the rest of his life.  Nor can I think of anything which would possibly motivate a person to want to change gender. Nothing could possibly be responsible for such behaviors, ecxept erotic/emotional pleasure, and we all know it, and I've talked to many TS people as good friends, and when I asked them "Be honest. After an orgasm, do you have any interest whatsoever in being a female?" The answer was always, "No."

I don't care about these myths. The only important thing is that people find happiness. However, they do make me laugh, and are generated by the social disapproval of sexual "deviations". I don't want to be a sexual deviate. I'd rather be a confused mixed up person with unexplained gender confusion. We can't do that with submission, since there is no such concept as submission confusion. We know it's purely erotic, and that's fine with us. It should be fine with TG people, but they don't like it, and I really don't care.


quote:

stella41b
This crock of bullshit is just an example of the sort of closed-minded prejudices spread about about the transgendered which influences the way people think, making it much harder for them to gain social acceptance and to progress forward in their transition.

The claim that TG people are doing this for sexual, kinky or erotic reasons is a preposterous one which isn't always necessarily true, and yet this remains one of the biggest issues of prejudice working against those for who are not motivated by such desires, but who are doing what they are doing simply to be themselves.


quote:

Tavane
They will vary infinitely. However, the idea that anything except the irresistible power of erotic pleasure could possibly motivate a person to do something so traumatic, in the face of such social disapproval, makes no sense whatever. What else could it be? There aren't that many powerful desires.


I was minding my own business and suddenly saw panties and guns and had to read this thread. I then came across both of your posts, Tavane and Stella.

I highligted the points I wish to address for you both brought up so much. And, let me say I shall speak from experiences relating to me, so, since I am not TG and cannot speak from the pov I shan't. I will use analogies from my life.

When I read "We know that erotic pleasure can motivate people to do almost anything," from Tavane, I began to think of the root of erotic, which is eros. To me eros is beyond sexual, and yet, I could understand why you, Stella responded with, "The claim that TG people are doing this for sexual, kinky or erotic reasons is a preposterous one which isn't always necessarily true, and yet this remains one of the biggest issues of prejudice working against those for who are not motivated by such desires, " makes total sense to me. You have seen what such ignorance can do to people. My heavens, you have experienced it first hand.

I myself have experienced what such ignorance can do by those who wish to generalize using no other reason than what seems most "logical" to themselves based upon their own life experience. *And* this can, and most often does, cause many problems for others because stereotypes, prejudices and tunnel vision mentalities are formed. Just look at all the disharmony in this world caused by those who cannot, and in some cases will not, attempt to see things from another's point of view. I'm not saying change one's point of view, but try to see things from another's point of view in the hopes of crossing some bridges and bringing more harmony and peace; a connection of souls.

Let me say, I have read many of your posts Stella and have grown to admire you greatly. You come across as a most compassionate woman who tries to see things from each person's point of view and one who also has great respect for people. So, when I read your post, I felt stirred to respond for you have touched not only my humourous side, but also my heart in your posts.

And Tavane, I have not read a lot of your posts, so please forgive me for I do not have as much a feeling about you, but I do know that your are speaking from your heart and from your experience. I wish to honour that.

So, Definition of eros from the free dictionary:
Er·os (rs, îr-)
n.
1. Greek Mythology The god of love, son of Aphrodite.
2. often eros Creative, often sexual yearning, love, or desire: "The new playful eros means that impulses and modes from other spheres enter the relations between men and women" Herbert Gold.
3.
a. Psychiatry Sexual drive; libido.
b. The sum of all instincts for self-preservation.

So, I look at def#1 and see Creative. There is also sexual yearning, love and desire. I know for me, many might say my lesbianism, my submission is driven by sexual desires. It's not. I can shag a man any day and got me eggs off. I want something much deeper than shag and shake. And that is when I look deeper into eros. (Again, I cannot speak as TG, but I think by my using this example I can get my point across.)

I remember reading books by some Jungians. Dark Eros by Thomas Moore comes to mind, as well as many by James Hillman and Masochism: A Jungian view by Lyn Cowan. So, when I look at eros, I see a deep desire, a longing to find the One. And, for me, as for many, this One is not a person. It is a deep connection to what some may call God, others call it Goddess, some call it Nirvana, Buddhahood, Enlightenment, or as John Hagelin terms it, The Unified Field. It is that ever pervasive call to home. And, for me, being lesbian, being submissive, is a tool for me to get there. I like to think of it as tools my soul uses to express myself.

Now, Tavane, I understand that you have met some TGs that said it was about the orgasm. Well, in some schools of thought, orgasms are considered a form of death where we die to being totally in the present moment. It is a death to the ego bound I and that smaller i to the "I" of the One. And, if I am with another (one can do this alone as well as with a partner) then together we let go of our boundaries just long enough to connect in that Unified Field/Bliss/Nirvana. *And* hopefully, we won't think that each is the cause of that blissful state for the other, but rather we realize we were just sharing the ride.

So, in a sense, the way I see it, if one looks at it from that pov, then maybe orgasm is a reason, but not the purely sexual kind. It's the eros of desiring to be one's true self, without the labels; without the judgments; without being lumped into a category.

Now I do find it humourous that in psychiatry, it is limited to sexual drive, libido. But then, the Freudians I have seen in the past, well, they were more in need of help than I. (I saw one at Kaiser in the early 1990s. I was in a suicidal depression and my therapist wanted me on meds. Well, he wanted to focus on if I'd slept with men and my lesbianism. The fact that I was on massive doses of prednisone and vicodin which caused depression did not enter his perverted mind. And I use that word not in the loving way we do for WIITWD, but in a clinical term for he was ill. ) So, you know my opinion of that branch of psychiatry; and it is open to change when I meet one who enlightens my pov.

Ah, but look at def. 3.b. The sum of all instincts for self-preservation. And Stella, please correct me if I am wrong, but is this not something of what you were trying to convey? I know for me, when trying to get others to understand my lesbianism; and with close friends, trying to get them to understand that my submissiveness, my desire to please Her, is not that "thing" that Hollywood portrays, well, I try to instill in them that it is part of my nature, my very essence. It is a way for me to survive in this 3rd dimensional collective reality we call earth.

Now, I won't go into the whole, "Well, really, I am a spiritual being on a human journey, so, in the big picture, I am complete and Whole as "I" am. I am speaking that in order to fulfill my calling in this lifetime, for me to be all that I am and experience what I came upon this planet to complete in order to ascend, then I must experience certain things. And, my lesbianism and submission are part of that. (As well as the physical illness I am healing myself from.)

So, Tavane, when you say, "We know that erotic pleasure can motivate people to do almost anything," and "What else could it be? There aren't that many powerful desires" I agree with you based upon the broader definition of erotic to include the definitions of eros and my longing, my desire to connect with that Creative force that created me. The eternal "I" of who I and i am.

And, when you say, "I don't care about these myths. The only important thing is that people find happiness," I agree with you. Let us all find our happiness and rejoice that others find theirs. *And*, let us all respect the feelings, life choices and point of view of others. *AND*, myths are a very important way of connecting to our quest to satisfy our *eros*. Just watch Joseph Campbell (or read his books). The Power of Myth is most wonderful as well as Mythos. But then, he was speaking of those myths that trigger that *desire* to go *home* to where we came from. And that is being true to ourselves. Let us all follow our bliss and do no harm to others. (Okay, if it's SSC then "beats me!" Thank you Mistress!

And let me end this with a quote by that most famous philosopher, Groucho Marx, "A child of five would understand this. Send someone to fetch a child of five. "

Sláinte,
TT




_____________________________


“Listen, I am trying to cope with the presence of God and the Universal Human Experience, and I haven’t even had a cup of tea yet!” -French and Saunders


(in reply to Tavane)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: Men in Panties - 2/23/2009 6:41:37 AM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
All of this from a simple question.  Sometimes, threads amaze Me.

No, I don't think the upsurge of males in panties is because they think it is what we want.  I do think it has more to do with what they want.  They aren't doing it because of us if it is in their main profile picture.




_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to TranceTara)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: Men in Panties - 2/23/2009 7:24:52 AM   
OttersSwim


Posts: 2860
Joined: 9/1/2008
Status: offline
I am for it!   So I wear them, and enjoy myself. 

My Lady (if I may speak for her) is sort of neutral to the whole question of what I wear, except in certain play circumstances.  What she -is- interested in, is my progression and growth to integrate my female side.  To Her, the clothes are mostly just the trappings.  She knows it excites me and is quite indulgent about it all.

As for other male subs, I can only speculate that all the Victoria's Secret advertising is working too well...or maybe it is the hormones in the milk. 

_____________________________

I am on a journey of authenticity and self.

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: Men in Panties - 2/23/2009 8:28:20 AM   
Tavane


Posts: 131
Joined: 3/10/2008
Status: offline
Well, we've made our points, and people can make their own decisions. It's like attacking someone's religion these days. I actually wrote a book about it, about 20 years ago, discussing it in great detail, since it interested me so much, but as time went by, I realized that in this type of thing, as in so many things in life, the people involved have no interest in seeking the truth. They believe what they want to believe, based upon self-interest, or some other reason, and it is pointless to waste time discussing it with them. For others, however, who don't have a vested interest in the subject matter, it's sometimes not pointless, and they might learn something, or at least be able to examine a different point of view. When people attack a person expressing a point of view, or characterize a point of view as somehow unacceptable,  instead of examining the logic, facts, and reasoning expressed which supports that point of view, then I do get bored with it. 

(in reply to OttersSwim)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: Men in Panties - 2/23/2009 9:10:22 AM   
stella41b


Posts: 4258
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: SW London (UK)
Status: offline
Tavane, thank you for your response to my posting, but I think you misunderstand me somewhat. I don't know you from Adam, but what I know is is that you are here just like me and you make postings just like me, and through this you voice your opinions and relate to your experiences just in the same way as I do and despite what you say I fully respect and support you in this.

My problem or issue as it were is when you go beyond this, confusing opinion and fact and start writing about the TG community, other TGs, the medical profession and men and women and attempt to come across as someone of authority who is presenting the truth and hard facts, when in fact what you are presenting is nothing other than your perception of the facts, your opinions and your beliefs.

For example in posting 40 you claim:

quote:



TG people do it for erotic and emotional pleasure. Nothing else could motivate a person to engage in such a strange and socially disapproved behavior, just as nothing else could motivate a male to be a slave of a female.



Really? Not even the medical condition gender dysphoria or gender dysmorphia? We're talking here about an internationally recognized medical condition. Now if you were to qualify your statement with the word some I would agree with you, but you don't, and this is where your statement becomes a blanket statement, a generalization, and in making such a blanket statement you misrepresent the trangendered community as a whole.

Previously you stated:

quote:


To suggest that TG people are anything like females is not suppored by any evidence of logic.



Maybe not, but it is supported by medical science and by specialist psychiatrists in gender issues who are actively studying and who are considered specialists, even establishing hospitals such as Charing Cross in London to which people like me are referred every year for treatment. There are other gender specialists working in other hospitals too, not just throughout the United Kingdom where the UK government's Gender Recognition Panel acknowledge at least fifty, but also internationally.

Just consider that phrase, 'gender recognition', which is a universally accepted legal term, and which infers quite clearly that gender is something which is recognized. Such is the nature of the medical condition we are discussing here.

Here again:

quote:



I don't think there is any difference between a "TV" and a "TS", in terms of desires.



You don't see a difference? I do, and what you are describing and referring to in your posts is transvestism, i.e. someone needing to crossdress and to wear clothing of the opposite sex for erotic, emotional or sexual reasons, and when you consider all your statements in the context of transvestism, yes they do make sense and you are right and yes, you do write with authority gained from first hand knowledge, and it is perfectly acceptable that you have met many TVs who have all said what you are claiming that they have said, and this is where you are right.

However a TV (transvestite) is not a TS (transsexual), there are very clear differences. The transvestite is a male who generally speaking does indeed get a thrill from passing himself off as a female and who has generally no desire to change their gender.

However the transsexual or TS is a female born with male physical characteristics generally raised and socialized as a male who experiences the feeling of being born into the wrong body and unlike the transvestite does exhibit psychological traits of a female just in the same way a naturally born woman does. She undergoes gender reassignment and SRS surgery not to become female, because when you look at it logically she is already a female, but she undergoes gender reassignment therapy and surgery to fully become herself, i.e. to have a physical body which matches her inner psychological and emotional nature.

The problem is both the transvestite and the transsexual suffer from gender dysphoria, 'dysphoria' being a Greek word for 'unhappiness' hence gender dysphoria is literally unhappiness with one's gender. This is not a mental illness, but a medical condition, but as we can see both have quite different motivations and differing degrees of gender dysphoria. This is the first hurdle which not just those who have it face, but it also presents a significant headache to the medical profession as a whole. Medical professionals talk in terms of 'secondary' and 'primary' cases of gender dysphoria in an attempt to distinguish betweren the two, but still in the early stages of her awareness of one's gender dysphoria, it is the motivations behind the desire to become someone of the opposite gender which can indicate the differences between a transvestite and a transsexual, who at this stage may appear to be the same.

The problem is that not just the transsexual will seek out opportunities for gender reassignment therapy, so too will any transvestite who believes that undergoing such treatment will make them more convincing or more feminine, and this presents the medical profession, and other transsexuals who are seeking gender reassignment therapy for genuine reasons, with a sizeable headache. Thanks to the attempts of these transvestites medical professionals often have to introduce lengthy delays to gender reassignment programs and to require additional hoops and hurdles which everyone must overcome in order to progress further in the process. There are even websites set up for these transvestites which school them in the right answers they need to give psychiatrists in order to get the treatment, and medical professionals have responded by making it even harder for everyone to get treatment.

This also makes it harder for everyone else, many of who without information or even contact with someone transgendered who are inclined to lump TVs and TS's together into one group of those commonly perceived as 'trying to become someone who they're not in reality'. With regard to the TS the reverse is actually true, i.e. they are trying to become who they actually are in reality and quite often needing to take on a large part of society in order to pull this off. With regard to the TV also this is a false assumption, because the TV is just being themself through crossdressing.

There is a difference because gender isn't connected with eroticism, it's not linked with sexual orientation, it's got nothing to do with whether someone is dominant or submissive, for all these are just different components of what goes together to make up the whole person.

What Tavane is doing is writing about transvestism but presenting what he is writing as being applicable to everyone who is transgendered by his repeated use of the TG label. These blanket statements misrepresent the transgendered community as a whole and are thus in Tavane using the TG label in these blanket statements are both misleading and inaccurate.

Then we have:

quote:



Then we have the reality that once you lose your genitals, you are not going to experience those same waves of erotic pleasure that motivated you to do this in the first place, but you can still experience erotic pleasure.



Reality? What reality? The reality is that someone undergoing SRS gender reassignment surgery does not lose their genitalia. The surgical procedure in a male to female case for example involves creating a clitoris from the nerve endings found around the glans of the penis and developing labia and a vaginal cavity from a piece of colonic tissue. A vagina created from such surgery looks just like that of a naturally born female.

Then we have:

quote:



We know that erotic pleasure can motivate people to do almost anything. I can't think of anything else which would possibly motivate a person to want to be a slave for the rest of his life. Nor can I think of anything which would possibly motivate a person to want to change gender.



My advice here would be to stop thinking about such reasons. Your assertion that a transsexual seeks gender reassignment for a good orgasm is probably one of the most ridiculous things I have ever come across on the Internet. It's very clear however that you're writing here on something you haven't even got a clue about. You even go further:

quote:



Nothing could possibly be responsible for such behaviors, ecxept erotic/emotional pleasure, and we all know it, and I've talked to many TS people as good friends, and when I asked them "Be honest. After an orgasm, do you have any interest whatsoever in being a female?" The answer was always, "No."



I've worked with the transgendered for over 10 years in Poland and here in the UK and I have yet to come across a transsexual who is seeking gender reassignment for sexual reasons. Anopther point is is that a transsexual isn't going through gender reassignment to become female, but to become themselves.

Then there's:

quote:



I don't care about these myths.



I can see that. You're too busy sat here on these message boards spreading your own myths.

Here you go again:

quote:



There is no rational or logical reason in the world for a person to change his/her gender. None. So that leaves us with non-rational reasons. These are limited to emotional and erotic reasons.



Of course there's no rational or logical reason for a person to change their gender, because they're not doing it out of choice, but out of necessity. You can try as much as you like, but you are never going to find that link between gender, sexual desire, sexual intercourse and sexual identity other than what you are writing about transvestism, and you sure aren't convincing anyone that all TGs are transvestites and don't need gender reassignment. Not me at least.

Then you write:

quote:



If TG people exist whose desire to be female is just as overpowering immediately after an orgasm, then they are different, but frankly I don't believe many such people exist, just as I don't believe that any submissive males exist whose submissive desires are just as powerful right after an orgasm.



I'm one of those people who you claim don't exist, but you know I have no desire to be female, aa I'm already female, but I have every desire to become my complete self. This has got nothing to do with having an orgasm. Nothing at all. So I would suggest you also stick that in your pipe and smoke it.

And yet again...

quote:



I've talked to scores of TG people, and am one myself. My desires and behaviors are very similar to theirs. There is no reason to believe that my desires are different than theirs. The only difference was that I looked so much more like a female.

I've also known many "TVs" who admitted that they were "TS's" when their wives weren't around, as a matter of desire, and who would tell her how straight they were, but then I'd see them passionately kissing some guy on a dance floor.

I'm not sexually straight or gay. I'm a TG. I'll get excited whenever anyone treats me like a female, whether it's a man or a woman. I only have emotional attraction to females, and they are built for the best sex,



You're blathering. Being transgendered is a medical condition. It is not a sexual orientation. No matter how much you try to present it a TV is not a TS just in the same way as a dog is not a cat. You are writing accurately about transvestism, but you are using the same labels, TG, TS, and in so doing so you are misrepresenting the entire transgendered community and writing wholly inaccurately about the transgendered community.

And therefore:

quote:



Stella41B: I just read your post, and you are entitled to your opinions, but so am I. I didn't attack any person, and do find your kind of posting inconsistent with rational discussion in an attempt to learn. This "I'm offended that you think that" mentality which permeates society in these PC days is frankly rude and isn't going to gain any acceptance by rational people who would like to hear all points of view.



Yes Tavane, you are entitled to your opinions and are equally free to make those opinions known and publish them here on the message boards of this site.

I've highlighted the statement you made about my style of posting in bold. But you know, there's over 2,000 postings, a few of which are in this thread, and as it's all there in black and white I'm going to leave it for everyone else to decide whether my style of posting is really 'inconsistant with rational discussion in an attempt to learn.'

For much of what I have written here in this posting above I have presented what I believe to be fact, and the facts I have presented are the sort of facts that can be verified by anyone reading this site with evidence they can find through using Google or some other Internet search engine. I'm presenting the facts above based on my own experiences, the experiences of others who I have worked with in the community, the experiences of those who support them not just from who I have met but also first hand experiences published by others, not to mention writing written on the basis of medical opinion from qualified clinical psychologists and psychiatrists.

But that was factual writing, and this is my opinion (note that there is a difference). I am not PC, nice try there to discredit me but I am not PC and this is quite inaccurate. I don't have anything against you Tavane, nothing at all, and I am inclined to accept your beliefs, opinions and what you think is just as equal and valid as what I think, and as my opinions and beliefs. In fact you write well on the subject of transvestism, very well, and given more accuracy in your writing there is ample opportunity for someone like you to contribute on these boards giving everyone else the transvestite's perspective and writing informative posts about trasnvestism. This is sincerely my opinion.

However it is also my opinion that you appear to have taken it upon yourself to be the spokesperson for the entire transgendered community and through the repeated use of the labels TG and TS seek to perhaps be the voice of authority on such things as gender reassignment. Most people here who haven't got a clue what it's like to be on a gender reassignment program no doubt will read what you write and take it seriously but you know you are not the only person who has had contact with the gender reassignment process, there are others, and some of them, like me, are successfully going through the process.

There are several of your postings on this thread, and all of them consistently use the TS and TG labels, and in them you make repeated references to gender reassignment and changing one's sex, therefore this is not a mistake, this is something which you appear to be aware of what you are doing, you appear to be doing this purposefully, despite the fact that this has very little to do with the actual subject of the thread posted by CatdeMedici, which was asking the question about why so many male submissives have photos on their profiles wearing female underwear.

The thing is in the context of transvestism as a subject what you are writing makes sense, however in the wider context of the transgendered community your postings make little sense, and your attempts to pass off your opinions and beliefs as facts and 'rational discussion' are only really turning what you write into complete and utter bollocks which are misrepresenting the transgendered community as a whole.

Now you are perfectly entitled to come here and write utter bollocks in your postings, there are others who do the same thing and if they can do it so can you and I have no wish to take away any sense of entitlement you have to be able to write complete and utter bollocks on these threads.

I'm sorry if you perceive me as rude (another nice attempt to discredit me which probaby isn't working) and PC, but for the benefit of others here, both transgendered and non-transgendered I'm sorry but I really do have to call bullshit on this one, and point out that you appear to be writing purposefully to misrepresent the transgendered community and to mislead others with your ridiculous assertions asnd nonsensical claptrap. If you think you are helping or furthering the transgendered cause writing what you have written then I'm sorry but I'm of the firm opinion that you are seriously deluded on this score.

And that is where I end, preferring to let everyone else draw their conclusions on the basis of what is posted on this thread.

With reference to the original topic and the OP I have nothing to add or contribute and apologize for my part in the hijack of this thread.

_____________________________

CM's Resident Lyricist
also Facebook
http://stella.baker.tripod.com/
50NZpoints
Q2
Simply Q

(in reply to Lockit)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: Men in Panties - 2/23/2009 9:15:04 AM   
Lockit


Posts: 11292
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
Tavane, it isn't that people are doing what you say for the reasons you say.  Very simply it is that you talk in black and white... your take on it is how it is... period.  You state things in general as this is the way it is and many disagree with that.  You cannot speak for all becasue you are older and wiser and more expereinced and you can't call what you have posted on many threads as something for the educational purpose of learning and those who have interest in it, not teachable or open to another view when you yourself are not open to their view and take on things.  You can't speak for everyone and you can't assume the postion of enlightening us all.

_____________________________

No matter how old a woman gets, some men will think she was born yesterday! ROFL... I love this place!


(in reply to Tavane)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: Men in Panties - 2/23/2009 11:32:39 AM   
Prinsexx


Posts: 4584
Joined: 8/27/2007
Status: offline
Stella: well written. Both factual and experiential. Thank you.

_____________________________

Owner of asterion

Metawhore.... the sound of a metaphore when gagged
Free woman
Resident thread finisher
To my stalker:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LN2lP_7J7GI&feature=fvwrel

(in reply to Lockit)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: Men in Panties - 2/23/2009 11:54:48 AM   
MsDDom


Posts: 368
Joined: 1/1/2009
From: GA
Status: offline
quote:

Is this what the majority of male subs offer because they think we want that or is cross dressing, sissy maid on the rise? Or am I out of it?


more often than none, men r the ones wanting to explore that sissy/fem side...i do not believe it is 100% provoked by FemDoms. because of sexual freedoms and/or deep rooted desires, i dont judge that a male sub/slave is into it...i am a pretty accepting person b/c i know i have my own "desires".

so, yes i think this kind of play is on the rise b/c bdsm facilitate freedom of life and expression.  and, no, u r not out of it...it is just something u dont like and W/we can respect that.


_____________________________

...:: MsDDom ::...

... live Life honestly ...

(in reply to CatdeMedici)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: Men in Panties - 2/23/2009 11:59:02 AM   
housesub4you


Posts: 1879
Joined: 4/2/2008
Status: offline
Well to answer your question as to "why" men are pictured wearing panties, wigs, etc. (in mine I'm wearing a french maids outfit)
I think the answer is very simple, that is what my Mistress at the time had me wear when I served her.  Nothing more nothing less.

She would have me paint my nails whenever I served and when in public with her.  As for her reason, she liked it, no more no less.

It's a fetish to some and more to others.  To each their own.  Me, I could care less what I wore/wear, I was serving at the feet of a Powerful Woman and was thrilled to be able to serve her in a way that pleased her.

I just leave the photo up because she moved out of state and I no longer have the chance to serve her, and I miss that. 


(in reply to CatdeMedici)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: Men in Panties - 2/23/2009 12:08:41 PM   
MidnightKat5000


Posts: 97
Joined: 1/10/2009
Status: offline
Cat: I find the "manty" shots gross and unattractive and the whole men in wigs thing effing lame.  I’m glad I'm not the only one. My men are to be masculine.

Tavane:  #1. As a woman, who just happens to be ts/tg, you sure as fuck do NOT speak for me.  You are giving out you opinions and experiences as cold hard fact which in turn makes you come across as an idiot. #2. Stop with the narcissistic bullshit!  Nothing you’re saying has anything to do with the OP, it’s all fluff and  irrelevant to the topic of discussion.

_____________________________

"A lobotomy means never having to say you're sorry."

(in reply to PanthersMom)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: Men in Panties - 2/23/2009 12:16:56 PM   
stella41b


Posts: 4258
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: SW London (UK)
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tavane

Well, we've made our points, and people can make their own decisions. It's like attacking someone's religion these days. I actually wrote a book about it, about 20 years ago, discussing it in great detail, since it interested me so much, but as time went by, I realized that in this type of thing, as in so many things in life, the people involved have no interest in seeking the truth. They believe what they want to believe, based upon self-interest, or some other reason, and it is pointless to waste time discussing it with them. For others, however, who don't have a vested interest in the subject matter, it's sometimes not pointless, and they might learn something, or at least be able to examine a different point of view. When people attack a person expressing a point of view, or characterize a point of view as somehow unacceptable,  instead of examining the logic, facts, and reasoning expressed which supports that point of view, then I do get bored with it. 


I'm not attacking you personally Tavane, but if you wish to see it that way please feel free. Just don't involve me in it nor try to misrepresent my words. They're up there in black and white for everyone to read.

I did also examine the logic, facts and reasoning expressed behind what you posted, and within the context of transvestism it makes a lot of sense and I agree with you and support you in what you posted.

However I wasn't the one who used the labels TG, TS or went to such lengths to write on gender reassignment and to describe the process. You did, those are your words in your postings and they are also there in black and white for everyone to see. These are your words.

Then there's this:

quote:



I realized that in this type of thing, as in so many things in life, the people involved have no interest in seeking the truth. They believe what they want to believe, based upon self-interest, or some other reason, and it is pointless to waste time discussing it with them.



Nice try again buddy, but that won't wash either. I have no interest in seeking the truth for me personally because it's already been discovered. Believe it or not I'm sitting here in London quite comfortably on the gender reassignment program at Charing Cross Hospital having done what they required of me - to integrate myself into society as a female and gain social acceptance as such.

I haven't published any books, nor do I have any interest in doing so. Just for the record, the Redcliffe Rainbow, the sLGBT focus group I am working to set up here in West London comes not from my years of activism in the LGBT community, but actually comes out of my voluntary work with the homeless here in London. I have been asked to develop and run this group by St Mungo's, a rather well known charity for homeless people, the same charity who supported Stonewall, the UK's leading Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual organization. St Mungo's wanted me to join Stonewall 2 years ago but it never came to be, and after polling their service users and staff and consulting with both the NHS and the local authority they approached me and asked me to develop and run the Redcliffe Roundabout.

Now on this platform, which I occupy in the public interest and not self-interest, I admit that I do seek out the truth, I'm required to speak up for the LGBT community including the transgendered community, to provide reliable information and to promote self-acceptance and self-awareness.

I try to do something similar on these boards and some of the people here may remember my input into some other threads primarily to give people enough information so that they can gain a better understanding and awareness of the issues faced by people who are transgendered.

I am biased of course by my own experiences of being on gender reassignment but this doesn't necessarily mean that I have to be prejudiced or against those who fall within the umbrella of transgendered, whether they be male panty wearers, sissies, crossdressers, transvestites, etc. I actually have very strong positive feelings towards sissies for example, one of the most maligned and misunderstood groups of people you can find in WIITWD. I don't have an axe to grind.

You can attack me all you like, you can claim that I'm attacking you all you like, but nothing is going to change the fact that you have no solid basis, either by factual evidence, by logic or by reasoning to justify your earlier attack on those seeking gender reassignment or indeed on the medical profession. You have no solid basis to back up your assertion that there is no difference between a TV and a TS, you also have no basis which proves any sort of link between gender and sexual orientation, sexual desires or sexual pleasure, just as you have no solid basis to back up your argument that females are more sexually submissive than men, and you have nothing to back up your libellous, insulting statements that a transgendered individual going through gender reassignment cannot think or feel anything like a woman.

I rest my case. I'm making no more references or posting again on this thread as I have nothing further to add to the discussion. Should Tavane or anyone else wish to take this any further please either take it up with me privately or start a new thread.

Let everyone else continue with the actual discussion of the thread.

Apologies yet again for the hijack

< Message edited by stella41b -- 2/23/2009 12:20:46 PM >


_____________________________

CM's Resident Lyricist
also Facebook
http://stella.baker.tripod.com/
50NZpoints
Q2
Simply Q

(in reply to Tavane)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: Men in Panties - 2/23/2009 11:49:44 PM   
AlexandraLynch


Posts: 778
Joined: 3/24/2008
Status: offline
Well, here's my take on it.

I am bisexual, and like my men male and my women female. This doesn't mean that I haven't been attracted to androgynous people, because I have, but by and large that's a pretty safe rule of thumb for me. Genderbending doesn't, by itself, trip my switches.

A man in panties doesn't inspire a huge reaction one way or another. I am....impatient, I guess, of excessive femininity in myself, and don't tend to dress superfemme. Everything's pretty much either black or denim, and while I like fancy lingerie, finding what I think looks good on me is a bit of a trick. And what I wear, I wear for me, not for anyone else. How much of this is due to early socialization that girlyness was useless and unproductive, that a woman could do a man's work and then second shift the house and kids and meals, that I developed early and have spend my life playing down and covering large breasts....well, who knows. It is what it is, and I have enough people who find me perfect as I am to not worry about it.

So I would be equally impatient with a man who was excessively worried about his appearance, probably, whether it was masculine or feminine or whatever.

I will use feminine trappings on a man whose gender presentation and cultural setting is overwhelmingly male not because women are inferior but because the specific item (whether panties or nail polish) are transgressive, and I do enjoy the sexual charge of forcing transgression of social norms in a partner.


_____________________________

I use fastreply. Don't take offence where none is meant.

Just because I'm not a bitch doesn't mean I'm not perfectly capable of making sure you'll be very sorry if you disobey.

(in reply to stella41b)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: Men in Panties - 2/24/2009 6:39:19 AM   
DavanKael


Posts: 3072
Joined: 10/6/2007
Status: offline
I know that a lot of folks, upon first contemplation of a male in submission, contrive ideas antithetical to anything stereotypically masculine.  I was discussing the very point a few months ago with a friend who (Knowing that stereotypical masculinity appeals to me far more than not) rather balked at the idea of my thinking a male behaving in submission to a female could be every bit as hot as one in Dominance, depending on the person and the circumstance.  It turned out, she was operating from the assumption of submissive as anti-male.  We discussed the following scenario at length as illustration: a male submissive and female Dominant in a publicvenue where amping up the dynamics were reasonable and prudent.  Her assumption was a male walking heel to the female and rather cowering/shriveling behind the female with the female in the lead physically; almost a stripping away of the male physicality.  I acknowledged'each unto their own' but said that didn't really appeal with hypothetical contemplation.  I, instead, asked her to entertain the idea of a male submissive instructed to 'herald our coming' by his lady and acting accordingly, taking the physical lead, showing that she has his deference and the benefit of whatever assets has being molded to her desires.  I think as with a lot of things, the intent behind the behavior and the dynamics between those involved is more telling than the specific behavior in terms of D/s scenarios. 
As for men in panties and the like < shrug >, I think that it's not an uncommon thing and I believe a number who have the preference for such attire and are into D/s may wish to accentuate the less masculine facets of self not only for their own pleasure but with the thought that Dominant ladies are looking for that.  Some are.  Again < shrug >. 
  Davan

_____________________________

May you live as long as you wish & love as long as you live
-Robert A Heinlein

It's about the person & the bond,not the bondage
-Me

Waiting is

170NZ (Aka:Sex God Du Jour) pts

Jesus,I've ALWAYS been a deviant
-Leadership527,Jeff

(in reply to AlexandraLynch)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress >> RE: Men in Panties Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125