Termyn8or
Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005 Status: offline
|
Lotus, was that late enough that you heard the sequel to Taxi ? I think it an excellent piece, and fits so well. I have both Taxi and Sequel and would like to merge them into one file so they play consecutively except for one problem, Taxi is live and Sequel is studio. I don't even know if there is a live version of sequel. More on topic, Taxi live sounded very good. On to the OP, things have changed technology wise. I remember when recorded live music almost always sounded like crap. No highs no lows, worse than Bose. I have old Zepplin from the BBC and such which although the performance was great, the recording was poor. That's back when they used to mike the concerts. Now mostly it is a board mix and many of the effects applied in the studio can now be used live, but that is not the whole story. Going E to E like that they improved the sound quality drastically, and the mikes are only used to mix in crowd noise. Some of the old Beatles, Zepplin and Pink Floyd recording were horrible live, but I doubt it sounded that bad if you were actually there. Part of that is due to what's called the Fletcher Munson curve, which basically means if it is loud enough it sounds better. Look it up on wiki if you don't know what it means, but I'll give a quickie, see the "loudness" button on a stereo ? the Fletcher Munson curve is why it's there. The human ear hears highs and lows better at higher volumes. Then we got to the new way of doing things. In my youth I was VERY surprised at the quality of sound on albums such as Micheal Stanley Band - Stagepass, Bob Segar - Double live bullet, and others like Peter Frampton - Frampton Comes Alive. This is when they changed, and no matter how good the performance is, if the recording is poor it is hard to enjoy at least for me. Before that time I had an array of equalizers and other sound enhancement equipment and knew how to use it. But then there is also the performance. Take Grand Funk. The song Inside Looking Out is not all that great in studio. On the Live album (IIRC) it also wasn't all that good, but on Caught In The Act it was great and the only version I like. Also some of the Micheal Stanley Band for example, there are a couple of songs that are alot better on Stagepass, which incidentally I had to buy because for the life of me I couldn't download it. At least not on P2P. I refuse to pay for things for which I have already paid for, in many cases more than once. Then there are pieces like Blue Oyster Cult - Cities on flame. The live version sounds great, if you have the equipment to apply anout 25Db of very low bass boost. Other than that it doesn't sound much different than the studio version. I know how hard it is to make a decent recording miked of a live performance as I have done it. I recorded it initially on AFM hifi, which is better than a CD, but when it came time to dub it to cassette it had to be compressed. Back then there were no CD recorders. I did have some pretty good cassette decks, and my buddy had a pretty good eight track recorder. Yes I am quite dated. I learned alot, tweaking the bias, some decks ha Dolby HX which after it was invented became mandatory on any deck I would buy, it made a BIG difference. I am so dated that I can tell you from first hand experience that a non-metal ready cassette deck records better on a chrome tape than a metal ready deck. I won't bore you with the technical reason why, but it's true. As years went by I got more and more into pure reproduction, the true spirit of high fidelity. Now I have no equalizer or anything of the sort. T
|