slvemike4u -> RE: Madoff, no plea deal, up to 150 years sentencing (3/12/2009 10:23:38 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda quote:
ORIGINAL: slvemike4u Yes Panda but a trial would have served for a great big discovery smorgasbord.The authorities would have loved to have these witnesses on the stand under oath answering questions. I know it, and that's what I just don't understand. I really want to know why the prosecution took the bat out of their own hands and let Madoff plead out. That's a question I'm really going to want an answer to at some point, and I think a lot other people are going to feel the same way. There'd better be a good reason for this, and unless a deal's already been cut that we don't know about, I'm having a hard time imagining what exactly would constitute a good reason. Did the prosecution really have a choice Panda,any judge advised that a defendant wants to plead guilty to all counts of an indictment would be hard pressed to not allow it.Guilty is guilty what reason could the prosecution claim to go forward.Discovery for future prosecutions would not sit well in the judges chambers.
|
|
|
|