Cuckqueaning of Fem Slaves (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Submissive



Message

MastersBitch96 -> Cuckqueaning of Fem Slaves (3/14/2009 2:18:06 PM)

Hi.  I have tried posting about this before, but without a lot of luck.  I'm hoping with some new faces will come some new insight.  :)  I have been with my Master for 14 years, we have been married for 10, poly (on and off) for 5, and I have been a cuckquean for 1.  My Master and I quickly discovered that there is precious little to be found by way of info on the subject.  Cuckolding of men- sure; cuckqueaning of women- nope.  Anyway, I'd love to banter a bit about this if anyone would care to share their opinions and/or experiences.  Since becoming a cuckquean, I have found that I'm becoming a sort of clearing house of info and contacts for other cucked fem slaves.  If anyone knows of any groups, sites etc on the topic... please share so that I can pass them on.  Additionally, if you would like to check out my CM profile I have up in my journal a link to my blog and to my cuckquean group at another site.  Feel free to post, send me a message or IM me, if you'd like.  Cheers! -- Jenn



IvyMorgan -> RE: Cuckqueaning of Fem Slaves (3/14/2009 3:26:36 PM)

This is something that one of t'other halves is interested in, and as such, I am thinking about it.

I think the lack of information is linked to the fact that there are fewer people who hold this kink tham some others.  Supply and demand, sort of.



RealSub58 -> RE: Cuckqueaning of Fem Slaves (3/14/2009 6:35:39 PM)

Are you spelling "cuckquean" right?
Not that I will google it anytime soon or even want to be more knowing about Cuckolding !  I hear alot about the spelling of  Cuckolding   being "wrong."
What do I know??
But maybe this is best in the Mistress section???
 



MastersBitch96 -> RE: Cuckqueaning of Fem Slaves (3/14/2009 8:25:46 PM)

Yes, the spelling is cuckquean.  And yes, cuckold is correct as well.



HeavansKeeper -> RE: Cuckqueaning of Fem Slaves (3/14/2009 11:03:17 PM)

Jenn,

You're no novice to humiliation. When a person is dehumanized, their gender doesn't matter. The only difference between girl toys and boy toys is the amount of holes. As a cuckquean, you are no different than a male cuckold - gender is no factor. In that regard, male oriented writings and opinions are generalizable.





VanessaChaland -> RE: Cuckqueaning of Fem Slaves (3/15/2009 2:10:38 AM)

The problem in part is that the term you are using is something that someone recently made up. Its not a phenomena that exists in the context of interest as does cuckolding. I have no problem with it, but expecting feedback on something with a made up word that is really just another form of everyday poly or swinging,,,,well don't be depressed that it gets little attention. :)



LookieNoNookie -> RE: Cuckqueaning of Fem Slaves (3/15/2009 6:24:23 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: VanessaChaland

The problem in part is that the term you are using is something that someone recently made up. Its not a phenomena that exists in the context of interest as does cuckolding. I have no problem with it, but expecting feedback on something with a made up word that is really just another form of everyday poly or swinging,,,,well don't be depressed that it gets little attention. :)


Contrary to public opinion MastersBitch96, it does exist, it is rather lightly covered and you'll find it if you look.  (And it's not a made up word, any more than every word in the dictionary is or ever was).



LadyHibiscus -> RE: Cuckqueaning of Fem Slaves (3/15/2009 6:36:46 PM)

It is so very common for males to fuck around as they like with impunity, I suspect the idea isn't discussed with any kind of label attached to it, even if the open sex is done with deliberate intent to hurt or humiliate.  Maybe a different set of search terms?



feydeplume -> RE: Cuckqueaning of Fem Slaves (3/16/2009 9:35:29 AM)

Thanks for a new topic to look up! And here i thought it was just one of those things that falls under "duties/responsibilities/thrills of a s" for some relationships. 



Lynnxz -> RE: Cuckqueaning of Fem Slaves (3/16/2009 9:49:55 AM)

I googled it... have nothing more interesting to add other than that this definition is hilarious.


cuckquean:
In the 16 and 17 th centuries, the wife of an unfaithful husband. See wife for synonyms.



Vendaval -> RE: Cuckqueaning of Fem Slaves (3/16/2009 4:57:38 PM)

Lol....Lynnxz  [:D]
 
That fits the bill perfectly!



LookieNoNookie -> RE: Cuckqueaning of Fem Slaves (3/16/2009 5:22:09 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lynnxz

I googled it... have nothing more interesting to add other than that this definition is hilarious.


cuckquean:
In the 16 and 17 th centuries, the wife of an unfaithful husband. See wife for synonyms.



That SLUT!!!!!!



MissAnimus -> RE: Cuckqueaning of Fem Slaves (3/16/2009 5:59:00 PM)

I'm actually very glad you asked about this, I was thinking about it today. Not 'doing' it...just pondering the concept. Unfortunately I don't have anything to add and I hope someone else will come up with something good. 



MissAnimus -> RE: Cuckqueaning of Fem Slaves (3/16/2009 6:00:01 PM)

I also wondered if there was a word for it...so I learned something, that's progress! 



Lordandmaster -> RE: Cuckqueaning of Fem Slaves (3/16/2009 6:11:08 PM)

Yup.  "Quean" was a derisive term for an adult woman--kinda like "wench," although "wench" often connoted a younger female, and "quean" an older one.  Anyway, eventually, "quean" became confused with "queen" (as in "gay male," etc.--that sense does NOT come from the word meaning "wife of a king").

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lynnxz

I googled it... have nothing more interesting to add other than that this definition is hilarious.

cuckquean:
In the 16 and 17 th centuries, the wife of an unfaithful husband. See wife for synonyms.



VanessaChaland -> RE: Cuckqueaning of Fem Slaves (3/16/2009 7:27:14 PM)

Interesting that in one dictionary its spelled without the "k". Others have no referance to it, some have it with the k. Overall, my opinion still stands, lol.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/cuckquean?jss=1

quote:

ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie

quote:

ORIGINAL: VanessaChaland

The problem in part is that the term you are using is something that someone recently made up. Its not a phenomena that exists in the context of interest as does cuckolding. I have no problem with it, but expecting feedback on something with a made up word that is really just another form of everyday poly or swinging,,,,well don't be depressed that it gets little attention. :)


Contrary to public opinion MastersBitch96, it does exist, it is rather lightly covered and you'll find it if you look.  (And it's not a made up word, any more than every word in the dictionary is or ever was).




Lordandmaster -> RE: Cuckqueaning of Fem Slaves (3/16/2009 7:32:27 PM)

It's not a term that anyone recently made up.  Look it up in the Oxford English Dictionary.  They have examples going back to the sixteenth century.



Lynnxz -> RE: Cuckqueaning of Fem Slaves (3/16/2009 7:40:49 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: VanessaChaland

Interesting that in one dictionary its spelled without the "k". Others have no referance to it, some have it with the k. Overall, my opinion still stands, lol.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/cuckquean?jss=1




There's bound to be spelling variations on it. Whether or not someone recently started applying the term to this type of relationship- there are still records of the word scattered about.



VanessaChaland -> RE: Cuckqueaning of Fem Slaves (3/17/2009 1:07:30 AM)

Perhaps I should have stated that its not used in the modern day lexicon of fetish or kink by most. 

Neither is obsequious, obescience, candaulism or for that matter moribund. And numerous, perhaps millions of other words either.

As to the concept or the definition behind it, I still maintain its silly as it may pertain to being the "same or opposite" of cuckoldry. Do I need to mention some variations of Mormonism and some "factions" of Muslims?
I mean when most of the worlds religious sects (the three Monos)  have applied a double standard to the freedoms afforded to males versus the oppression of women based on their own writings (as in the rules they wrote themselves to favor themselves and passed off as the "Word Of God), well its not quite the same as the origins and unique characteristics of the term "cuckold" right. 

As to the pedants, yes sure, no doubt their is some variation of the word "anal" that I have never heard of that dates back 2000 years, but really its lack of relevancy to modern day life is of little importance to me. :)



Lordandmaster -> RE: Cuckqueaning of Fem Slaves (3/17/2009 8:07:36 AM)

"Obsequious" and "moribund" are certainly used in today's language.  The language is not whatever VanessaChaland happens to have heard.

quote:

ORIGINAL: VanessaChaland

Perhaps I should have stated that its not used in the modern day lexicon of fetish or kink by most. 

Neither is obsequious, obescience, candaulism or for that matter moribund. And numerous, perhaps millions of other words either.

As to the concept or the definition behind it, I still maintain its silly as it may pertain to being the "same or opposite" of cuckoldry. Do I need to mention some variations of Mormonism and some "factions" of Muslims?
I mean when most of the worlds religious sects (the three Monos)  have applied a double standard to the freedoms afforded to males versus the oppression of women based on their own writings (as in the rules they wrote themselves to favor themselves and passed off as the "Word Of God), well its not quite the same as the origins and unique characteristics of the term "cuckold" right. 

As to the pedants, yes sure, no doubt their is some variation of the word "anal" that I have never heard of that dates back 2000 years, but really its lack of relevancy to modern day life is of little importance to me. :)



Page: [1] 2   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125