RE: Limits vs "Theoretical" No Limits

RE: Limits vs "Theoretical" No Limits (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

Destinysskeins -> RE: Limits vs "Theoretical" No Limits (8/16/2004 10:46:37 AM)
Greetings, This question is directed towards Leonidas... You said that You've owned 'no limits' slaves before and that such slaves tend to steer clear of Sadists since obviously this could become a truly dangerous situation. (makes sense). my question merely is what sort of role does this sort of slave play? What sort of activities did You find that they were suited for in Your service? ...just curious Well wishes

NightDaughter -> RE: Limits vs "Theoretical" No Limits (8/16/2004 10:47:44 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: NightDaughter subs/slaves: what are some of your Hard Limits, what are some of your soft limits? Well my hard limits are few, but many have already stated them in their own fashion. I would not kill another or take my own life etc, I would not harm a child in any way shape or form. Soft limits on the other hand, shrugs, that's another matter I don't preceve myself as having any of those. The only main limits I'd say I have outside of the moral and ethical ones are my physical limitations, and those are another thred intirly imo. quote: both now the kicker, some people clime to have no limits what so ever, that what ever is asked of them they will do, well what do you think of this? Do you think that its truly possible to have no limits? if so please explain if not please also explain. As to the idea of no limits, well there are those who believe that what ever their dominant tells them to do on to death that they will do. But personaly i'm of the mind that with the right partner that shares your personal moral and ethical understandings, that there is the possibility of a theoretical no limit deal. Yes everyone has a limit, wether it be physical or other wise I do not believe that there is a person on earth who does not have some type of limit. well take care everyone, its nice reading various points of view on this topic.

starshine -> RE: Limits vs "Theoretical" No Limits (8/16/2004 10:49:37 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Gitta Not sure this is of any help to anyone, i do know there are a few, who will understand, and most will not...that is ok. Gitta, you have me there! Not sure I understand it, certainly its not for me, but it IS for you and I just want to wish you all the best [:)]. Starshine

gitta -> RE: Limits vs "Theoretical" No Limits (8/16/2004 11:01:54 AM)
starshine, Thank you very much, this slave wishes you all the best. For me it is something i have done for 35 years, it fits me. During all of these years, i have heard many argue that all people have limits. What this slave is saying put simply is she is a human being who does not have limits in her. She knows those she serves, and would not wear a collar of one she did not trust. Without a doubt there are few who live this way or even can...and that is ok it is not for everyone.

afmvdp -> RE: Limits vs "Theoretical" No Limits (8/16/2004 11:27:50 AM)
I think "no limits" is really one of these modern misnomers that gets tossed about without reluctance. Although there may be some out there I have yet to meet someone who genuinely had "no" limits. Now in juxtaposition to that I think the more intelligent of the world out there who claim to a "no limits" label in actuality mean they desire something similar to what Leonidas had mentioned. Where no limits are directly stated or applied, where if a Dom were to want to do anything of an extreme matter they could but in finding the proper Head you have found the one that would never desire something actually beyond your limits. Perhaps beyond your preconceived limits, but not above actual limits. I believe that outside the rubber room friends, the desire of an actual "no limits" slave wouldn't even be a desire from either aspect. I'm looking for fulfillment not a cadaver or a science experiment.

Leonidas -> RE: Limits vs "Theoretical" No Limits (8/16/2004 11:43:20 AM)
She made the dean's list, because it is what her master set as a task for her, and cried at the simple "good girl" that was her reward. She got promoted. She served my morning coffee to me in a way that was humble, and graceful, and said volumes about the nature of devotion. She stopped traffic, and never failed to catch my eye, just by walking as she had been trained to walk. She swam every day to keep her body lithe and toned. She moved heaven, and earth, and customer service reps, and government employees, because she was a devoted slave about her master's business, and would, therefore, not take no for an answer. She always had cookies and milk on the table after school, and read bedtime stories to my children when I was away with work. She was a pleasure to watch, and interact with, because her senses were alive, and she was deeply touched and moved by the simplest things. She wore my robe around the house before she packed it for me, so that it would smell like her when I was away. She was happy to be the eye candy that made any occasion something to remember, giggling with the other naked or nearly naked slave girls hurrying to serve the men, or playing in the pool, or just kneeling quietly and following the conversation. She was sexually helpless in her need and responsiveness, quick to grow hot at a dominant touch, and shamelessly provocative in a way that never ever got old. OK, I have to stop here, though I could go on and on. Thanks for the trip down memory lane, Destiny.

gitta -> RE: Limits vs "Theoretical" No Limits (8/16/2004 11:53:20 AM)
Leonidas, Thank You for clearly stating what a no limit slave is to You, seems far to few can see them in such a light...some even think we should be placed in rubber rooms...shudders

starshine -> RE: Limits vs "Theoretical" No Limits (8/16/2004 3:40:37 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Gitta .some even think we should be placed in rubber rooms...shudders Gitta, if a rubber room stops me bruising myself on the underground and giving myself paper cuts in the office etc, I'll be your room-mate [:)]. I swear I do more "damage" to myself at work than any sane Dom could manage... lol As for limits/no limits - its just one more thing for everyone to disagree on... sighs. Personally I have loads, but I'd never dream of going round telling anyone that they just "have to have" them. We're all individuals, that's what makes us special [:)]

gitta -> RE: Limits vs "Theoretical" No Limits (8/16/2004 4:13:40 PM)
starshine, Well hello room-mate!! Have only been hurt once by a Master, was bad equiptment, not under His control....many work injuries though. thanks for being real...

NoCalOwner -> RE: Limits vs "Theoretical" No Limits (8/16/2004 4:26:27 PM)
That is absolutely beautiful, Leonidas.

LadyBeckett -> RE: Limits vs "Theoretical" No Limits (8/16/2004 4:26:28 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Leonidas She made the dean's list, because it is what her master set as a task for her, and cried at the simple "good girl" that was her reward. She got promoted. She served my morning coffee to me with in a way that was humble, and graceful, and said volumes about the nature of devotion. She stopped traffic, and never failed to catch my eye, just by walking as she had been trained to walk. She swam every day to keep her body lithe and toned. She moved heaven, and earth, and customer service reps, and government employees, because she was a devoted slave about her master's business, and would, therefore, not take no for an answer. She always had cookies and milk on the table after school, and read bedtime stories to my children when I was away with work. She was a pleasure to watch, and interact with, because her senses were alive, and she was deeply touched and moved by the simplest things. She wore my robe around the house before she packed it for me, so that it would smell like her when I was away. She was happy to be the eye candy that made any occasion something to remember, giggling with the other naked or nearly naked slave girls hurrying to serve the men, or playing in the pool, or just kneeling quietly and following the conversation. She was sexually helpless in her need and responsiveness, quick to grow hot at a dominant touch, and shamelessly provocative in a way that never ever got old. OK, I have to stop here, though I could go on and on. Thanks for the trip down memory lane, Destiny. What you describe, Leonidas, is an incredible, intelligent, ambitious Woman, who knew the secret of loving Her man well. In this case, she just happened to be a slave. Lucky you. [;)]

Destinysskeins -> RE: Limits vs "Theoretical" No Limits (8/16/2004 6:53:52 PM)
smiles to Leonidas i must agree...that was beautiful but i'd have to disagree slighty with Lady Beckett and say that both You and Your slave were lucky. You so because of the devotion You were shown and her because of the deep appreciation that is evident in Your description of her. You're very welcome even though it is i that should be thanking You for taking the time to express these thoughts in such a clear and descriptive manner. Well wishes!

sting516 -> RE: Limits vs "Theoretical" No Limits (9/6/2004 3:19:11 PM)
quote: subs/slaves: what are some of your Hard Limits, what are some of your soft limits For me, i'd consider my hard limits to be involving children, permanent disfigurement, vomit play, involvememt of a third person against their will, and something that would wind me up in jail...real jail that is. Soft limits would vary depending on who i was with. sting

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.078125