StrangerThan
Posts: 1515
Joined: 4/25/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: stella41b quote:
ORIGINAL: StrangerThan I don't see it as a civil rights thing. There is a difference in whether one suffers legal and social issues because of who or what one is, rather than how they choose to live life. Okay so a same sex couple - is that according to you a choice or a necessity? quote:
ORIGINAL: StrangerThan Now I know we can debate all day about activity that doesn't fall into sexual realms, but ya know, any time someone's ass is getting spanked, one or more in that equation usually feel some sort of sexual response. And you're really sure about that, are you? quote:
ORIGINAL: StrangerThan I don't see it as an innate right to foster my sexuality nor the practice of it upon the public at large. Care to go back to my OP and indicate where I expressed such an opinion? Hate quoting all that stuff above, but for it to make sense, I guess I should. So - Okay so a same sex couple - is that according to you a choice or a necessity? It's a choice, the same as it is for a hetero couple. No one requires you to live with anyone regardless of whether you're straight, bi or gay. Having said that, this is one of those areas of debate wherein we try to enclose the entire debate within a wrapper that has merit. I support anyone's choice to live with or be with whomever they want - mostly because it's none of my business and I don't really care. I would never support legislation to limit anything thereof. I happen to believe in the life, liberty and pursuit of happiness thing. Next - Am I really sure that in a spanking, ass-whipping, whatever type scenario someone is generally feeling some sort of sexual response? Yeah pretty much. I didn't say they engaged. But I'm open to changing that perspective if everyone here tells me different. That being said, I have disciplined/punished before and felt no sexual response. But as a general thing? Yeah. And finally, "Care to go back to my OP and indicate where I expressed such an opinion?" in terms of fostering one's sexuality or the practice of it upon the public at large. You're talking about it in terms of a civil rights extension - which means that tons and tons of legislation will follow that with folks sitting around trying to legislate what is appropriate and what is not. And in this case it covers a massive spectrum of sexual activities, dominance and submission activities, list goes on and on. That is fostering your practices, your sexual behavior on the public at large. The fact of the matter is, you can pretty much do what you want to do without some protetctive legislative umbrella. And the fact of the matter is that many things we do (collectively speaking) is an exercise limited to and should be limited to adult audiences. To me, that means it doesn't belong to the public at large and is a private, personal decision and choice. Another simple fact is that if you're not an idiot about it, you probably don't have a lot of worries about police raiding your home. I have no problem with what you want to practice. I do have a problem with putting sexual and private practices out in the ballpark for lawyers to sit around and determine what's appropriate and what's not - and part of that is that I despise sweeping legislation when it comes to handling the problem cases.
_____________________________
--'Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to reform' - Mark Twain
|