HeavansKeeper -> RE: Question on M/M relationship (3/23/2009 3:39:59 PM)
|
Just to be clear, M/M means master/master, right? This post deals more with the interactions of two dominants, independent of sex and orientation. I'd assume there aren't many because neither is getting what they need (in the M/s dynamic sense) from the other. Why be entwined with someone who can never please you in that capacity? Love does strike in awkward ways, and that brings some M/M couples together. Separating dominance and gender, I see more Dom/Domme couples (but probably a similar amount per capita as compared to the M/M couples of the gay community). Often they got into BDSM after meeting each other and both identified with dominance. As a dominant male, I can see myself falling in love with a dominant female, but our D/s needs would have to deal with an additional hurdle. It's not the end of the world. We may even add a submissive to our family, but then we'd be M/M/s. Even playing with submissives makes us M/M/s for the night, that is to say we are not complete without someone filling that spot. The OP, youngdude, identifies as a switch. Assuming 1) he meets a dominant man, and 2) he has a 50-50 switch nature, half the time it's D/s and the other half D/D. What would you do during those times? Find a submissive to play with, stifle the desire, or go see a movie (which is kind of the same as option two).
|
|
|
|