Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Gaza - the facts emerge


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Gaza - the facts emerge Page: <<   < prev  7 8 [9] 10 11   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Gaza - the facts emerge - 3/27/2009 7:59:13 AM   
kittinSol


Posts: 16926
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

I don't know, Ken. You may be right: I hope you're not though... I dislike what's going on in Israel, but I fear Israel has little choice other than to come down hard on her enemies. What else would any other country do, after all?

I'm not happy with the situation either but i think you misunderstood. By the definition you posted intent matters when talking about genocide. Hamas wants to kill all the jews in Israel, its their stated goal, therefore their actions in furtherance of that goal are genocidal. Israel has no intention of wiping out all palestinians in Gaza or the West Bank, if they wanted to they could have done that long ago.


Hi Ken - I didn't misunderstand, I got your point... Simply, my hope is that Hamas' stated goal is rhetorical only...

_____________________________



(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 161
RE: Gaza - the facts emerge - 3/27/2009 8:22:27 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol
Hi Ken - I didn't misunderstand, I got your point... Simply, my hope is that Hamas' stated goal is rhetorical only...

Sorry I misunderstood the point you were making. On that After seeing and reading translations of Hamas radio and TV broadcasts I've got to say they're way too enthusiastic about it for it to be rhetoric.

(in reply to kittinSol)
Profile   Post #: 162
RE: Gaza - the facts emerge - 3/27/2009 10:06:41 AM   
StrangerThan


Posts: 1515
Joined: 4/25/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

There's a legal definition of genocide (it is not the only definition, but at least it's a legal one) in the 1948 United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (CPPCG), article 2: it defines genocide as "any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: killing members of the group; causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life, calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; [and] forcibly transferring children of the group to another group."


Are you attempting to answer my question to KaineD?

If so, you give information, but fail to answer the specific question.

I'm very interested in hearing Kaine's answer.

Firm



Using the 21 deaths from homemade rockets as a debating point is a bit of a misdirection. Yeah, maybe 21 people died from homemade rockets since 2002, but the actual number of deaths from Palestinian violence and terrorist attacks is much higher. The Israeli foreign affairs ministry lists something like.. 6,500  Palestinians and 1,179 Israelis since 2000.

http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/Terrorism-+Obstacle+to+Peace/Palestinian+terror+since+2000/Victims+of+Palestinian+Violence+and+Terrorism+sinc.htm

and as almost always is the case, the number of injured is usually much higher than the death toll. The same site records over 8,000 injuries in the same time frame.

I think what is missing from some here is that no one is defending using a child as a shield or any outright war crime. What comes across badly though is the immediate condemnation of the military action in the first place and it done in a way that insinuates condemnation of Israel itself. The fact of the matter is war is not pretty. Innocent people die. Innocent people always will die and for many of those cases, there is no outright national guilt or legal burden associated with it. The death of innocents is not an automatic, nor de facto war crime. The targeting of them, abuse of them, genocidial actions taken towards them is.

The nature of the warfare being played out in many arenas now makes the instant fingerpointing both easy to do and, in some cases, fairly easy to defend. Guerillas often use 'safe' areas from which to conduct operations, hide, or retreat to. And in trying to find them, locate them and engage them, forces are often surrounded both by a populace that knows where they are but damned sure aren't going to help them and international groups that scrutinize every move.

Soldiers are human. They don't decide policy or when to its time to go to war. They have a job to do and part of that job is and will always be engaging the enemy in a capture or kill modes. Violations of human rights and outright war crimes should be prosecuted to the fullest extent. Mistakes should be prosecuted as well, but I don't think on the same level. It is one thing to strap kids to a jeep and use them as shields and another to cause innocent death by collateral action or by actual mistake.

Israel lives with the constant threat of terrorist attack in a way that most western nations do not. People die every year, not in the occasional attacks we've seen here in the US and they manage to do it and maintain freedom for their people. Given our response internally in US to 9/11, I'm not sure we could do the same. In a few short years our elected representatives turned blind eyes to renditions, torture, arrest without warrant or access to legal counsel, surveilance that directly violated the constitution, illegal wire tapping.

One of the generals, Tommy Franks maybe, said that his greatest fear was that the Constitution would be a casualty in the next terrorist attack on US soil. Watching what we allowed as a nation. I can't disagree with him. Watching what Israel does as a nation, I can't disagree with them either. Yes, specific things need to be addressed and specific actions perhaps prosecuted. Beyond that, they have every right to use whatever means available to protect and defend themselves.



_____________________________


--'Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to reform' - Mark Twain

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 163
RE: Gaza - the facts emerge - 3/27/2009 10:44:52 AM   
KaineD


Posts: 497
Joined: 2/14/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

And yet you spend hours and hours here defending them....interesting, very interesting.


Oy.

I've never defended Hamas.

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 164
RE: Gaza - the facts emerge - 3/27/2009 10:47:17 AM   
KaineD


Posts: 497
Joined: 2/14/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
Funny thing is by that definition, which seems valid to me, Hamas is engaged in genocide and Israel and the IDf isn't.


How do you figure, when we know that at least some Israeli soldiers were ordered to fire indescriminantly?

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 165
RE: Gaza - the facts emerge - 3/27/2009 10:50:34 AM   
KaineD


Posts: 497
Joined: 2/14/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

Are you attempting to answer my question to KaineD?

If so, you give information, but fail to answer the specific question.

I'm very interested in hearing Kaine's answer.

Firm



Why is it that you expect me to answer your asinine questions, when you absolutely flat out refuse to answer my questions?

Are you even reading my responses to you?

Seriously, what is the point in debating with you when you simply ignore entire posts of mine?

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 166
RE: Gaza - the facts emerge - 3/27/2009 11:27:57 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: KaineD

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
Funny thing is by that definition, which seems valid to me, Hamas is engaged in genocide and Israel and the IDf isn't.


How do you figure, when we know that at least some Israeli soldiers were ordered to fire indescriminantly?

Read the definition. A free fire zone isn't genocide. Genocide requires a specific intent which is quite obviously missing from all your allegations against the IDF.

(in reply to KaineD)
Profile   Post #: 167
RE: Gaza - the facts emerge - 3/27/2009 11:36:04 AM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: KaineD

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

Are you attempting to answer my question to KaineD?

If so, you give information, but fail to answer the specific question.

I'm very interested in hearing Kaine's answer.


Why is it that you expect me to answer your asinine questions, when you absolutely flat out refuse to answer my questions?

Are you even reading my responses to you?

Seriously, what is the point in debating with you when you simply ignore entire posts of mine?


I read all of your questions, but you want to throw in Peter, Paul, Mary, and Dr. Suess into every discussion - which is fine in it's place, but not here, for this discussion, for me.

I've been getting to a very specific understanding of where your support for Hamas comes from (and you can claim all you want that you don't support Hamas, but you do, as you constantly claim that Israel is the aggressor party in almost all instances, and that only Israel practices "genocide" and "war crimes".  If you had started half as many threads condemning Hamas or the Palestinians, I'm might be convinced that you are evenhanded in your beliefs.  Look at posters such as StrangerThan and others for a balanced concept of what's happening in the Middle East.)

For the sake of discussion, we have (albeit like pulling teeth) concluded that we could argue that both entities are practicing genocide (as I said, I don't believe it, but just for the sake of advancing the discussion, I'll accept it for now).

What I am attempting to do now is define "genocide", which is a word that you throw around quiet freely, with the appearance (to me at least) that you do not understand the term, or intentionally misuse it to your advantage.

If you read the post by kittin closely (and you can check this link out for a more detailed discussion), then Hamas is indeed practicing genocide, in almost all it forms against Israel and the Jews of Israel.

The next step in the discussion would be to see if Israeli actions also meet the legal definitions of "genocide".  Regardless of whether or not it does (and the UN seems to often think it does), my core question to you is the same as it has been: Why are you supporting one genocidal government over another?

I suspect that I (and most of the other posters) have made our own conclusions about this already, but I'm willing to concede that perhaps I am mistaken.  I did say that we will discuss Israel, and IDF actions once we have gotten to the answers to my curiosity about your stance, and I indeed intend to honor my words, less your desertion of the discussion.

So ...

1.  How many people must be killed to qualify as "genocide"?

2.  If Israel is "at least partially responsible" for the failure of the ceasefire, does this make Hamas "mostly largely responsible" for the failure of the ceasefire?

3. Is Hamas the legally elected government and representatives of the Palestinian people, at least in Gaza, where the Israeli military actions occured?

4.  Has Hamas taken any actions to attempt to consummate their charter's call for the genocide of the Jews of Israel?

5. If you don't "support" the Palestinian people, and their legally elected government ... then what would you consider "support" to mean?  What is it you call your position?  Lack of support?  Equal condemnation of both sides?

6.  Why do you take a position that Israel is more worthy of condemation for "genocide" than Hamas?

Firm


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to KaineD)
Profile   Post #: 168
RE: Gaza - the facts emerge - 3/27/2009 11:47:34 AM   
KaineD


Posts: 497
Joined: 2/14/2006
Status: offline
Okay, look, we're not getting anywhere.

I'm not going to debate with someone who continiously insists that I support Hamas when I do not.  I have not said anything that can be construed in that way.  I think it is very disrespectful of you to insist that I do.

I will not debate someone that ignored my points continiously and doesn't answer very simple questions, and yet expects me to answer all of his.

I will not debate someone that continiously deflects from having to answer questions about the wrong doings of the IDF by pointing to the wrong doings of Hamas - for the quadrilionth time, Hamas are bad people and I condemn them.  It does not help your case to repeatidly point out that Hamas are bad people.  That doesn't excuse the actions of the IDF.

In short, we're done.

< Message edited by KaineD -- 3/27/2009 11:49:00 AM >

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 169
RE: Gaza - the facts emerge - 3/27/2009 11:53:05 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: KaineD

Okay, look, we're not getting anywhere.

I'm not going to debate with someone who continiously insists that I support Hamas when I do not.  I have not said anything that can be construed in that way.  I think it is very disrespectful of you to insist that I do.

I will not debate someone that ignored my points continiously and doesn't answer very simple questions, and yet expects me to answer all of his.

I will not debate someone that continiously deflects from having to answer questions about the wrong doings of the IDF by pointing to the wrong doings of Hamas - for the quadrilionth time, Hamas are bad people and I condemn them.  It does not help your case to repeatidly point out that Hamas are bad people.  That doesn't excuse the actions of the IDF.

In short, we're done.

You certainly give a strong appearance of support for Hamas. You also seem to have accepted certain claims without seriously examining the proferred evidence or applying any critical thought to the claims or the evidence.

(in reply to KaineD)
Profile   Post #: 170
RE: Gaza - the facts emerge - 3/27/2009 12:07:19 PM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: KaineD

Okay, look, we're not getting anywhere.

I'm not going to debate with someone who continiously insists that I support Hamas when I do not.  I have not said anything that can be construed in that way.  I think it is very disrespectful of you to insist that I do.

I will not debate someone that ignored my points continiously and doesn't answer very simple questions, and yet expects me to answer all of his.

I will not debate someone that continiously deflects from having to answer questions about the wrong doings of the IDF by pointing to the wrong doings of Hamas - for the quadrilionth time, Hamas are bad people and I condemn them.  It does not help your case to repeatidly point out that Hamas are bad people.  That doesn't excuse the actions of the IDF.

In short, we're done.

You certainly give a strong appearance of support for Hamas. You also seem to have accepted certain claims without seriously examining the proferred evidence or applying any critical thought to the claims or the evidence.



Rather than answer honestly, he deserts the field when the evidence and logic doesn't fit his preconceived ideas, or when he must answer pointed questions on his beliefs.

It all has to be his way, or no way.  He's not interested in a discussion.  He is only interested in spreading propaganda and aspersions.

As I said, I think most of us have already drawn our conclusions about his reasons for his words and his actions.

How does it feel to be on the same side for once, DomKen?

Firm

< Message edited by FirmhandKY -- 3/27/2009 12:09:32 PM >


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 171
RE: Gaza - the facts emerge - 3/27/2009 12:10:19 PM   
KaineD


Posts: 497
Joined: 2/14/2006
Status: offline
That's what I'd thought you'd say.  But I think its pretty clear for anyone with an open mind who would read over the last few pages to see who was playing games and who was trying to stick to the topic at hand.

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 172
RE: Gaza - the facts emerge - 3/27/2009 12:14:54 PM   
KaineD


Posts: 497
Joined: 2/14/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

You certainly give a strong appearance of support for Hamas. You also seem to have accepted certain claims without seriously examining the proferred evidence or applying any critical thought to the claims or the evidence.



Show me a single comment of mine where I have the appearance of support for Hamas.

I have examined the evidence.  You seem to perpeptually ignore evidence.

I don't think you're one to lecture about critical thought, Mr. "Obviously that man is a consenting translator", with absolutely no evidence or claim from the IDF to back that up.  When Amnesty, Human Rights Watch, and the UN criticize the IDF I listen, and you don't.

But no, I'm the bad guy.

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 173
RE: Gaza - the facts emerge - 3/27/2009 12:31:28 PM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: KaineD

That's what I'd thought you'd say.  But I think its pretty clear for anyone with an open mind who would read over the last few pages to see who was playing games and who was trying to stick to the topic at hand.


Of the six questions I gave in my last response to you, all except one is in direct response to claims you have made, or questions you have posed.

Only the last question is one I've posed directly, and that is one that I've asked you repeatedly, but you have done your utmost to avoid.

Any time you wish to actually engage in discussion rather than emotional, propaganda based rhetoric, I'm here.

I've said at least twice that I'm willing to discussion IDF actions, but only after I have an understanding of your position.  You can choose not to respond, but by doing so, you are allowing anyone who also wishes to know your reasoning to draw their own conclusions.

Firm

_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to KaineD)
Profile   Post #: 174
RE: Gaza - the facts emerge - 3/27/2009 12:42:58 PM   
calamitysandra


Posts: 1682
Joined: 3/17/2006
Status: offline
So now this is a "if you are not with me, you are against me" situation?
Is it not possible to criticize the IDF and the Israeli government, without being accused of supporting terrorism?


_____________________________

"Whenever people are laughing, they are generally not killing one another"
Alan Alda


(in reply to RealityLicks)
Profile   Post #: 175
RE: Gaza - the facts emerge - 3/27/2009 12:45:24 PM   
KaineD


Posts: 497
Joined: 2/14/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: calamitysandra

So now this is a "if you are not with me, you are against me" situation?
Is it not possible to criticize the IDF and the Israeli government, without being accused of supporting terrorism?



Apparently not.

I've answered the question he is referring to, but he won't answer my questions.  He's projecting his own debating faults onto me.  I won't deal with someone like that.

(in reply to calamitysandra)
Profile   Post #: 176
RE: Gaza - the facts emerge - 3/27/2009 12:48:44 PM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline

I sleep just fine.  Thanks, if that was meant for me.  I'm actually proud of the "dry" discussion.  This means that you yourself see my attempt at discussion without clouding emotions as successful (at least on my part).

Emotions are great, and give context to life.  They can also be the cause of centuries of conflict and suffering, so sometimes we have to look at things bereft of the darkening storms of emotions.

So ...

Since Kaine seems adverse to answering certain questions, how about you?

1. Does Hamas both advocate and take actions to support genocide of Jews and Israelis?

2. Do you believe that Israel advocates and takes actions to support genocide of Arabs and Palestinians?

3. Which side (if any) do you support, and why?

Firm


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to RealityLicks)
Profile   Post #: 177
RE: Gaza - the facts emerge - 3/27/2009 12:57:25 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: calamitysandra

So now this is a "if you are not with me, you are against me" situation?
Is it not possible to criticize the IDF and the Israeli government, without being accused of supporting terrorism?


It is possible, I criticize both sides and have never been called a supporter of terrorists on this issue at least, but if you simply spew not credible attacks against the IDF and try to minimize the bad acts of Hamas then yes you are going to be accused of supporting terrorism.

(in reply to calamitysandra)
Profile   Post #: 178
RE: Gaza - the facts emerge - 3/27/2009 12:59:07 PM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: KaineD

I've answered the question he is referring to, but he won't answer my questions. 


Bullshit.  You've answered none of the six questions I posed.

Firm


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to KaineD)
Profile   Post #: 179
RE: Gaza - the facts emerge - 3/27/2009 1:05:20 PM   
KaineD


Posts: 497
Joined: 2/14/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

Since Kaine seems adverse to answering certain questions, how about you?[/QUOTE]


Are you trying to be antagonistic?

You know you haven't answered my questions from several pages ago, but you're trying to take the higher ground because I've had enough of your games and won't answer your questions on this page.

You only want to debate on your terms, feeling free to ignore everything else you deem inconvenient, and then you project those faults onto those you disagree with.

quote:

Can you accept that the IDF using human shields is wrong?  Yes or no.  Can you accept that the IDF bombing over half the medical facilities of Gaza is wrong?  (And we know that they knew where those medical facilities were, the UN told them).  Can you accept the high death count within such a short space of time points to a collective punishment of the Palestinians as a people?  (Self defense would be more applicable a description if Israel didn't kill so many innocents, and we know at least some of their soldiers were ordered to shoot indescriminantly) And can you accept that this high death count is counter-productive to any chance for peace between the Palestinians and Israel?

Without any deflections to the wrong doings of Hamas


quote:

So you're saying that Amnesty and Human Rights Watch and the UN are all in the business of spreading propaganda for Hamas?


quote:

are you actually saying that you see no distinction between a terrorist group and the people of Gaza?


< Message edited by KaineD -- 3/27/2009 1:50:22 PM >

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 180
Page:   <<   < prev  7 8 [9] 10 11   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Gaza - the facts emerge Page: <<   < prev  7 8 [9] 10 11   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109