RE: And we support this regime why again? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


VanessaChaland -> RE: And we support this regime why again? (3/26/2009 7:12:46 PM)

 Umm, wind, solar, renewable, tidal, bio, green, alterations in our lifestyle, dependence on cars as we know them, mass transit, more people working from homes, using our own resources, just a few little things like that. :)

And of course Muslim women defend their culture. They will be beheaded if they don't.  Sheesh.

quote:

ORIGINAL: slaveboyforyou

You're wrong about there "ALWAYS being alternatives."  Saudia Arabia is a major player in the Middle East and in OPEC.  We have to deal with them.  Our entire economic stability depends on steady oil supplies from that part of the world.  Besides it isn't our place to force our morality on other nations.  We don't have any room to talk considering our own culture's treatment of women.  The rate of violent crime towards women in this country is much higher than any Islamic nation.  It's that reason that Muslim cultures feel justified with following strict interpretations of the Islamic law.  In fact, you'll find survey after survey where Muslim women defend their culture. 




VanessaChaland -> RE: And we support this regime why again? (3/26/2009 7:18:26 PM)

The job of our government is to protect our borders and the best interests of the USA. If Mexico and Canada were getting nuked, I think fallout might disregard our borders and be a slight problem.

Our government is you and me. We the people and all that. But on a more important note, we the people, as in the people of the world have a humanitarian duty to protect those that are unable to protect themselves. We can't sit by the sidelines and watch another Nazi Germany develop, nor while Africa slaughters itself, nor while millions of women are "owned", kept illiterate in some cases, raped, and have thier clits cut off. I mean what the hell does that make us that we have the power to stop some of this and don't?  :)


quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

Vanessa, the job of the U.S. govt. is to run our country not to go around taking on the problems of foreign countries.
And as a U.S. Citizen I really don't much care what they do in foreign countries.
I'm not willing to pay more for "special coffee" because some people in the U.S. think "Juan Valdez" isn't making enough money for his coffee beans.
People would be better off and our country would be better served if we put all that energy into making the U.S. a better country.




slaveboyforyou -> RE: And we support this regime why again? (3/26/2009 7:47:29 PM)

quote:

Umm, wind, solar, renewable, tidal, bio, green, alterations in our lifestyle, dependence on cars as we know them, mass transit, more people working from homes, using our own resources, just a few little things like that. :)


The technology is not avaliable yet for wind and solar energy to be efficient enough to replace petroleum.  Despite what the green squad tell you, it's simply not good enough yet.  The technology for tidal turbines is not advanced enough to be reliable yet.  "Bio" and "green" is a pretty broad reaching buzz word.  You'll have to narrow that down. 

What alterations in our lifestlye do you propose?  I think the majority of us do everything we can to cut down on energy costs; we have to.  It's rich limousine liberal assholes like Al Gore that say shit like that, but they don't actually apply it to themselves.  Mass transit is great for dense metropolitan areas; not all of us live in those areas.  Even when mass transit systems are put into cities with a lot of car usage, people don't use it.  Working is home is fine for people that are able to.  But again, a lot of folks can't do that.  People can't do construction, unload trucks, run farms, install electrical systems, etc. from the comfort of their home office. 

We do use our own resources.  We used to supply most of the world's oil.  Standard Oil had the largest "navy" in the world at one time.  But we hit peak oil 40 years ago.  We'd like to drill for oil where it most likely is off-shore and in certain areas of Alaska.  But now that Mr. Obama is in office, don't hold your breath waiting for that to happen. 

quote:

And of course Muslim women defend their culture. They will be beheaded if they don't.  Sheesh. 


No they don't. 




ienigma777 -> RE: And we support this regime why again? (3/26/2009 10:54:44 PM)

I hope this will help.....
www.opednews.com/maxwrite/print_friendly.php?=opedne_w_

opednews.com/articles/opedne_w_chris_080113_why_does_t_bush_just.htm

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/libertybandwagon/message/28046?l=1

www.jregrassroots.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=6804

www.wesjones.com/saudi1:htm

infonature.org/english/world_news/eng-usa_bush_family_bussiness.htm

www.oilempire.us/bushnazi.htm

patrickmurfin.livejournal.com/tag/protectionism

www.declarepeace.org.uk/captain/murder_inc/site/bandarbush.html





VanessaChaland -> RE: And we support this regime why again? (3/26/2009 11:45:07 PM)

Come on, liberal, conservative blah, blah, blah. I mean who is the biggest supporters of NASCAR? Right wing, conservatives. Guys driving 200 miles an hour every Sunday, in circles, turning left, for 500 miles, who came to their job in private planes and whose cars were shipped on Semi's. That sounds "green" to me.

The technology IS there, but no one is supporting it. Not unlike most things in our Military-Industrial complex society, money has to come from the Gov. sector before things can be perfected and implemented and passed on to the private sector.
And yes, Mulim women are caned, raped and beheaded for anything their "owners" decide they should be. They have no voice, are not recognized by the courts equally. I mean Good Lord man, Google some photos and info about this. It's everywhere.

quote:

ORIGINAL: slaveboyforyou

quote:

Umm, wind, solar, renewable, tidal, bio, green, alterations in our lifestyle, dependence on cars as we know them, mass transit, more people working from homes, using our own resources, just a few little things like that. :)


The technology is not avaliable yet for wind and solar energy to be efficient enough to replace petroleum.  Despite what the green squad tell you, it's simply not good enough yet.  The technology for tidal turbines is not advanced enough to be reliable yet.  "Bio" and "green" is a pretty broad reaching buzz word.  You'll have to narrow that down. 

What alterations in our lifestlye do you propose?  I think the majority of us do everything we can to cut down on energy costs; we have to.  It's rich limousine liberal assholes like Al Gore that say shit like that, but they don't actually apply it to themselves.  Mass transit is great for dense metropolitan areas; not all of us live in those areas.  Even when mass transit systems are put into cities with a lot of car usage, people don't use it.  Working is home is fine for people that are able to.  But again, a lot of folks can't do that.  People can't do construction, unload trucks, run farms, install electrical systems, etc. from the comfort of their home office. 

We do use our own resources.  We used to supply most of the world's oil.  Standard Oil had the largest "navy" in the world at one time.  But we hit peak oil 40 years ago.  We'd like to drill for oil where it most likely is off-shore and in certain areas of Alaska.  But now that Mr. Obama is in office, don't hold your breath waiting for that to happen. 

quote:

And of course Muslim women defend their culture. They will be beheaded if they don't.  Sheesh. 


No they don't. 




slaveboyforyou -> RE: And we support this regime why again? (3/27/2009 12:35:56 AM)

quote:

who came to their job in private planes and whose cars were shipped on Semi's. That sounds "green" to me.


They aren't the ones telling average folks to go "green."  I don't watch auto racing of any kind, but I don't deride people that do.  I don't long for a "green" society where we all wear hemp clothing, birkenstocks, and hold hands on Earth Day as we sing We are the World.  The thought of living in a society like that makes me ill.  I am for conservation and responsible nature stewardship.  I am not a neo-hippie, loony alarmists that sees a environmental apocalypse right around the corner. 

quote:

The technology IS there, but no one is supporting it. Not unlike most things in our Military-Industrial complex society, money has to come from the Gov. sector before things can be perfected and implemented and passed on to the private sector.


No the technology is not efficient enough to compete with oil based energy.  You can't match the efficiency of petroleum burning power plants with wind farms or solar power economically.  The only viable alternatives are coal and nuclear power.  I'm all for using coal, which we have in great abundance.  I'm all for building more nuclear power plants, which we can operate better than anyone else.  But the alarmists have successfully stopped us from expanding our use of both. 

Because of these assholes, we have used up our food producing lands to grow corn for ethanol.  As a result, poor people in third world countries are having trouble getting staples to feed themselves.  When we actually do have companies that propose placing wind turbines in the best places for them.....offshore, people like the Kennedys bitch and moan that it will screw up their view.  When we propose more oil exploration in the places we know it exists, the folks on the East and West coasts don't want those nasty oil rigs near them.  Even though they use most of the power and fuel in this country, they want us dumb rednecks in the middle to shoulder the burden. 

quote:

And yes, Mulim women are caned, raped and beheaded for anything their "owners" decide they should be. They have no voice, are not recognized by the courts equally. I mean Good Lord man, Google some photos and info about this. It's everywhere. 


Caning is a punishment that has been used for public disorder offenses all over the world.  It's not just the Muslims.  Hell, we flogged people in some states all the way up until the mid-20th Century.  Frankly, I think it was a mistake to get rid of it.  We could free up a lot of jail space if we gave 50 lashes to shoplifters and petty thieves in town square. 

Rape is a world-wide problem, and it's not exactly rare here.  Now it's true that Muslim women are treated like second class citizens.  Yes, there are countries that stone women for adultury, sorcery, and a few other things.  They also hand and behead homosexuals, drug dealers, and other people they deem undesireable.  But the Saudis aren't beheading women for disagreeing with government policy, and that is the statement you made.  Good lord woman, find me a case where the Saudis have cut a woman's head off for saying she wants to drive a car. 

It's their culture and their religion.  I don't agree with it, but I also don't agree with the treatment of people in predominately Bhuddist Burma.  I don't agree with hanging drug couriers in Asian nations.  I don't agree with Brazilian police executing street kids for annoying shop keepers.  I don't agree with the way Fidel Castro treats his people (of course he's a fucking hero to the far-Left in this country).  But I am not a citizen of those countries.  It's not my or your responsibility to fix their problems.  We have enough problems of our own to fix.  I just choose not to travel to countries that have practices like that. 




calamitysandra -> RE: And we support this regime why again? (3/27/2009 12:47:28 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: VanessaChaland

Our government is you and me. We the people and all that. But on a more important note, we the people, as in the people of the world have a humanitarian duty to protect those that are unable to protect themselves. We can't sit by the sidelines and watch another Nazi Germany develop, nor while Africa slaughters itself, nor while millions of women are "owned", kept illiterate in some cases, raped, and have thier clits cut off. I mean what the hell does that make us that we have the power to stop some of this and don't?  :)



This!




VanessaChaland -> RE: And we support this regime why again? (3/27/2009 12:50:35 AM)

Any person, male, female, child, old, young, any race or culture anywhere, that is a slave, deprived of life, liberty and justice, raped, beaten, murdered is everyones concern everywhere. Surely I don't need to refer an educated person like your self to:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_they_came...

We don't chose our place of birth, our skin color, or language or culture. We DO chose what actions we take to help those that are born in more unfortunate circumstances than ours. We can either choose to speak out and try to help, or we can choose to do nothing and let them suffer. I choose the former.




VanessaChaland -> RE: And we support this regime why again? (3/27/2009 2:09:37 AM)

 Just curious, whats your beef with the following? I happen to kind of like it. :)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wb1NHZ-euAc




quote:

ORIGINAL: slaveboyforyou

They aren't the ones telling average folks to go "green."  I don't watch auto racing of any kind, but I don't deride people that do.  I don't long for a "green" society where we all wear hemp clothing, birkenstocks, and hold hands on Earth Day as we sing We are the World.   





OrionTheWolf -> RE: And we support this regime why again? (3/27/2009 7:37:17 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: VanessaChaland

Any person, male, female, child, old, young, any race or culture anywhere, that is a slave, deprived of life, liberty and justice, raped, beaten, murdered is everyones concern everywhere. Surely I don't need to refer an educated person like your self to:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_they_came...


Why? Does not a society have the right to evolve as they wish? It has been through severe oppresion, and then strength to throw it off, that freedom has been won. If Freedom is given, then it is not a right, but a privilege. Is this not a judgement of the morals of another society, and stating that ours is superior? Is that not what leads to wars?

quote:


We don't chose our place of birth, our skin color, or language or culture. We DO chose what actions we take to help those that are born in more unfortunate circumstances than ours. We can either choose to speak out and try to help, or we can choose to do nothing and let them suffer. I choose the former.


Circumstances are neither fortunate, or unfortunate. It is what that society makes of it, which means effort is made. Fortune means lack of effort to effect the outcome. Speaking out and not supporting is fine, but at what point are we supporting the idea of suppression of a different morality, and it being hypocricy when someone has the same attitude towards us?

If people feel strongly then do the things you need to do, to offer alternatives and support. Active action in another society is intervention into the sovereignty of that society. If the problems goes outside the borders of that society/nation, then it becomes an international concern for just those issues that are spilling over. This allows each society to evolve through the things it needs to experience to bring about whatever form of government they wish.

Socialist, communist, and democratic societies all feel they are superior to one another.

On a personal level I would like to see US involvement reduce extremely in Saudi and many, many other countries.




MasterShake69 -> RE: And we support this regime why again? (3/27/2009 12:20:30 PM)

$10 a gallon gas has huge impact not on just gas prices when you gas up your car but on every product.  For example how would you like to more then double grocery food prices??? 

quote:

ORIGINAL: VanessaChaland

Sure I do. And every time I buy some new Tupperware I say to myself "Fuck those Saudi women and all like them that live a horrible life of beatings, despair, torture, no options and death at the hands of the insane patriarchial SOBs that "own" them. As long as I get cheap gasoline, plastics and other products why should I give a fuck about others"?

You really disappoint me slave boy. That type of generalized statement belongs on Fox News or an after school special for kids. Seriously, we all know how important petroleum is in our day to day lives, still must we support the worst of the worst to get it? There are alternatives. There has ALWAYS been alternatives. I would happily pay $10 a gallon for gas if it meant that other women around the world would be free from the jackasses that currently "own" them and have power due to the money they have, which we gave them, to buy oil, so Bush Co. could make more millions. :(

quote:

ORIGINAL: slaveboyforyou

I guess you don't use petroleum in any way, shape, or form. [8|] 





MasterShake69 -> RE: And we support this regime why again? (3/27/2009 12:23:12 PM)

There are many jobs you just cant do at home.  Also working at home takes people who are very disciplined.  Many people need structure that an office provides.


quote:

ORIGINAL: VanessaChaland

Umm, wind, solar, renewable, tidal, bio, green, alterations in our lifestyle, dependence on cars as we know them, mass transit, more people working from homes, using our own resources, just a few little things like that. :)

And of course Muslim women defend their culture. They will be beheaded if they don't.  Sheesh.

quote:

ORIGINAL: slaveboyforyou

You're wrong about there "ALWAYS being alternatives."  Saudia Arabia is a major player in the Middle East and in OPEC.  We have to deal with them.  Our entire economic stability depends on steady oil supplies from that part of the world.  Besides it isn't our place to force our morality on other nations.  We don't have any room to talk considering our own culture's treatment of women.  The rate of violent crime towards women in this country is much higher than any Islamic nation.  It's that reason that Muslim cultures feel justified with following strict interpretations of the Islamic law.  In fact, you'll find survey after survey where Muslim women defend their culture. 





MarsBonfire -> RE: And we support this regime why again? (3/27/2009 3:33:43 PM)

Actually, it's been a case of- no one UNTIL RECENTLY has been in a position to support it. Even with the GOP cutting off funding at every turn for solar and wind research, the tech is advancing. Now, with Obama's investment in alternative energy research and development, we can catch up to other countries like Germany who are aiming to replace 1/3 of their total electrical needs with solar by 2020.

There're also space power sats. These would be huge orbiting solar arrays that would beam energy back to Earth in the form of mircowaves. They would be placed in high orbit, where they wouldn't have to deal with the Earth's shadow in any way. No night time, no down time. Tested, proven, and ready to go. Building such stations would be more expensive than nuclear power plants, sure... but only if you don't factor in the waste storage costs that will last several thousand years. Space solar power has no waste.

Then there's the probability that we could mine Helium 3 off the lunar regolith. A few pounds of H3 is enough to create a fusion reaction much, much more easily than our current "brute force" experiments allow, and one that would supply NYC with power for several months.

There are also experiments underway to try and tap into the Kasimir Effect (sometimes referred to as "zero point energy" or "quantum pressure." Which has been recently verified and measured. (Frankly, I think this one is probably decades away from producing anything usable, but the idea of pulling all our energy needs out of the fabric of spacetime itself- literally out of nothing-  is just too sexy not to at least mention it.)

There ARE alternatives out there.

There is no energy crisis.

There's only a crisis of lack of vision and determination.

But you know, it helps when you have a President who ISN'T the puppet ruler of the oil company interests behind the fucking desk in the oval.





slaveboyforyou -> RE: And we support this regime why again? (3/27/2009 3:43:53 PM)

quote:

There ARE alternatives out there.

There is no energy crisis.

There's only a crisis of lack of vision and determination.

But you know, it helps when you have a President who ISN'T the puppet ruler of the oil company interests behind the fucking desk in the oval.


Yeah there are alternatives that cost way too much.  The science fiction examples you listed are on the drawing board.  We aren't anywhere close to having sources of energy like power sats or mining helium in the cosmos.  NASA doesn't project a return to the moon until 2020, and that's just a return to it.  By the way, that was Bush's idea.  As usual, you like to blame Bush and the oil companies.  The oil companies are one of the biggest researchers of alternative energy sources.  It's in their best interest to stay ahead of the curb.  Despite what you and others believe, the oil companies are not conspiring against alternative energy.  If they could make money off of building things like that, they would. 




MarsBonfire -> RE: And we support this regime why again? (3/27/2009 6:59:44 PM)

Oh, suuuuuure they would. [8|]

Thanks to independant funding of solar cell research, amorphous cell structure silicon has dropped the cost and difficulty of manufacture on solar cells to the point where you can now power your home for about the same cost as a new BMW. With federal tax breaks for installation, you could drop that to the cost of a new Ford. The cells would also come with a lifespan close to 25 years (which is better than the car would) Currently, they are designing a form of roofing panels which would do the same job as your shingles, and cut your dependance on the grid by 80%. Probably more as they are improved over the years, thanks to increased demand.

Wind power is exploding. You may not think much of it SB4U, but American Industry sure as hell does. The midwest wind corridor is sprouting turbines like mushrooms in a dark cave. And those intrests are making some pretty good money off the deal. Sorry you feel you need to blind yourself to that reality. The center of the US could get as much as 25% of it's electrical needs met by wind power within the next decade, IF the federal government continues to offer incentives to build and improve them.

Geothermal is being used where practical, but until we find a way to drill down that far without the inherent problems of vulcanisim, it's not going to be for general use. Same with tidal generation. Great for the coasts, but no so much for the center of the country. Oceanic thermal holds promise, but there may be major ecological concerns attached to it.

Again, just to set the record straight... I was talking about helium 3 mining... not helium. It's fairly common throughout the solar system... but not so much here on Earth. It's okay, I know a lot of people who haven't bothered to research it. Yes, it WAS Bush's idea to distract the nation from his lies about the war by promising to take us back to the moon. Doing something right for all the wrong reasons is still doing something right, I suppose. Somehow, I'd think if "Curious George" Bush had science in mind when he made that decision, he also wouldn't have maimed stem cell research for almost two fucking decades. No, Bush decided to take us back to the moon (without any increase in NASA's budget, BTW) for purely political reasons... to distract people from the fact he lied about yellowcake from Nigeria, and was responsible for trashing the Constitution.

The "science fiction" solutions I cited were to give some examples of some of the more interesting systems that might be available within the next 25 years. Naturally, you poo-pooed the notions. After all, what from science fiction has ever come true in real life? LOL! Trips to the moon? Ha! Home computers? Nonsense! Advances in medical research? Bah!

You know, it's funny how all those things have come to pass even though (and perhaps in spite of) people like yourself, SB4U, automatically naysaying them. Again, I hear the painful bleating of a dinosaur being slowly sucked down into a tar pit... Or maybe it's the grumbling of a luddite, proven ineffective against a machine that can do his job 50 times better and faster.

My point is, there are alternatives, and they need to be researched and developed. Otherwise, the only alternative you propose is "more of the same"... at least until the lights go out and the cold begins to creep in.




slaveboyforyou -> RE: And we support this regime why again? (3/27/2009 7:25:45 PM)

quote:

Oh, suuuuuure they would. [8|]


Go beyond your personal bigotry and actually prove me wrong with facts. 

quote:

Thanks to independant funding of solar cell research, amorphous cell structure silicon has dropped the cost and difficulty of manufacture on solar cells to the point where you can now power your home for about the same cost as a new BMW. With federal tax breaks for installation, you could drop that to the cost of a new Ford. The cells would also come with a lifespan close to 25 years (which is better than the car would) Currently, they are designing a form of roofing panels which would do the same job as your shingles, and cut your dependance on the grid by 80%. Probably more as they are improved over the years, thanks to increased demand.


Again, please provide proof for any of the above.  You have a habit of making assertions without backing them up. 

quote:

Wind power is exploding. You may not think much of it SB4U, but American Industry sure as hell does. The midwest wind corridor is sprouting turbines like mushrooms in a dark cave. And those intrests are making some pretty good money off the deal. Sorry you feel you need to blind yourself to that reality. The center of the US could get as much as 25% of it's electrical needs met by wind power within the next decade, IF the federal government continues to offer incentives to build and improve them.


Bullshit.  You are again making claims without proof.  Show me how any of what you said is more efficient than oil, coal, or nuclear based power plants?

quote:

Again, just to set the record straight... I was talking about helium 3 mining... not helium. It's fairly common throughout the solar system... but not so much here on Earth. It's okay, I know a lot of people who haven't bothered to research it. Yes, it WAS Bush's idea to distract the nation from his lies about the war by promising to take us back to the moon. Doing something right for all the wrong reasons is still doing something right, I suppose. Somehow, I'd think if "Curious George" Bush had science in mind when he made that decision, he also wouldn't have maimed stem cell research for almost two fucking decades. No, Bush decided to take us back to the moon (without any increase in NASA's budget, BTW) for purely political reasons... to distract people from the fact he lied about yellowcake from Nigeria, and was responsible for trashing the Constitution.


Yeah, yeah, yeah.  Bush did it all.  You are so close minded.  You still don't seem to understand that energy derived from outer space is not possible right now.  It's simply a idea.  It can't be done with our current technology.  If it can, please show me how and if it can be done more cheaply than using petroleum. 

quote:

The "science fiction" solutions I cited were to give some examples of some of the more interesting systems that might be available within the next 25 years. Naturally, you poo-pooed the notions. After all, what from science fiction has ever come true in real life? LOL! Trips to the moon? Ha! Home computers? Nonsense! Advances in medical research? Bah!


No, you tried to make it sound like Bush was preventing research on these ideas.  It can't be done now, and you knew it.  You tried to turn it into a anti-Bush argument.  Your hatred prevents you from making logical arguments. 

quote:

You know, it's funny how all those things have come to pass even though (and perhaps in spite of) people like yourself, SB4U, automatically naysaying them. Again, I hear the painful bleating of a dinosaur being slowly sucked down into a tar pit... Or maybe it's the grumbling of a luddite, proven ineffective against a machine that can do his job 50 times better and faster.

My point is, there are alternatives, and they need to be researched and developed. Otherwise, the only alternative you propose is "more of the same"... at least until the lights go out and the cold begins to creep in  


No, your point was to lay blame on conservatives.  The "alternatives" are non-existent in our current state of technology.  In 50 years, we may have those alternatives.  You're trying to fabricate some sort of conspiracy with Bush and the oil companies to prevent new technology.  Every post you make mentions Republicans.  You never actually make a logical post.  You are just fueled with hatred, Mars (bipolarber). 




StrangerThan -> RE: And we support this regime why again? (3/27/2009 7:44:04 PM)

You'll not find a bigger supporter of alternative enery research than me. America was taught the lesson of depending on foreign oil back in the 70's. It was a lesson we forgot once things smoothed out and cheap oil started flowing again. The OP wants to know why we support this regime. The simple answer to that is that we're dependent, more dependent than a crack addict needing his next fix. Our entire society is built upon. Take out the oil, it will collapse. I have absolutely no doubt of that statement. Gone are the days when the bulk of society either lived in a place where they could be somewhat self supporting or even knew how. That and the pervasive use of oil in other products. Gas and oil are only part of it. We need to not only find new ways of providing electricity, but to re-work a lot of formulas that use petroleum.

Having said that, it's not a lifeline we can cut yet. The alternatives that are out there are only good as an addition to, not as a replacement. Build as many wind farms as you want, I doubt they'll ever be able to stand in as a replacement. Oil is consistent in its ability to provide power. The wind is not. And yeah, I think big oil would be the first to jump on a viable replacement. They'd be stupid not to, and if you look at their profits over the last few decades, stupid is not something they are when it comes to making money.

The idea though isn't just to have alternatives, but have affordable ones - and not in just one area, but across the board. Electric cars suffer one basic fault that dooms them for widespread use and that's the ability to stop and fill up and be gone in 5 to 10 minutes.

We're going to be sucking on oil's tit for a while. I agree there are lots of options out there but the bottom line for many is often cost. It's easy to say that installing solar power on your house will cut your electric bill or remove it completely. That sounds good. Even with tax breaks though, you're looking at 30k or so in costs. Electric bills vary in different states. Where I live, probably $225 a month is about average. That's looking at 10-15 years just to break even, assuming no breakage, no maintenance costs. If you figure it into the cost of buying a house or building one, it's a losing proposition once you figure the interest.

We need the research. No debate with you on that. Until costs come down though, alternative forms will be what they are now - the occasional oddity in the neighborhood, not the standard. And until costs come down, we'll be babysitting Middle Eastern states, acting as if we really give a shit what they think, and offering respect under the guise of cultural differences for what are really acts of barbarism. Not talking beheading there, but when some countries are afraid even for a woman to learn to read, they're pretty fucking barbaric in my eyes.

Simple facts of life.




popeye1250 -> RE: And we support this regime why again? (3/27/2009 8:28:35 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: VanessaChaland

Any person, male, female, child, old, young, any race or culture anywhere, that is a slave, deprived of life, liberty and justice, raped, beaten, murdered is everyones concern everywhere. Surely I don't need to refer an educated person like your self to:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_they_came...

We don't chose our place of birth, our skin color, or language or culture. We DO chose what actions we take to help those that are born in more unfortunate circumstances than ours. We can either choose to speak out and try to help, or we can choose to do nothing and let them suffer. I choose the former.


Vanessa, if that's the case *you* pick up a rifle and you go play Don Quixote.
When are U.S. Citizens going to benefit from such benevolence from overseas?
I think God made the Oceans to keep us seperate and that's fine with me, great plan!
The U.S. Military is for *our* protection, they're not "peace keepers" or roving social workers.
You'll have *no problems* finding foreigners who want to get us involved in *their* problems!
"My brother died in battle so that Saudi women could have the right to drive cars."
Please!!!




jlf1961 -> RE: And we support this regime why again? (3/27/2009 9:36:58 PM)

I really hate to throw gasoline on a fire, but in this case, I will make an exception.

Saudi Arabia as it is now was founded in 1902, and was supported by Great Britain.  The US got involved in Saudi Arabia to counter the growing Soviet influence in the region.

Now, as for the culture, if I may point out, Saudi Arabia is not the only country that has that much religious influence on the culture, Iran is almost as bad, and was as bad if not worse during the Khomeini years.  Afghanistan under the Taliban was equally restrictive, and women were not even allowed to be educated.

Now, as far as why we support the Saud regime, it is quite simple, Saudi Arabia has been the ONLY Muslim ally that has done anything concerning Bin Ladin and his followers.  When you consider that Osama Bin Ladin is under a death sentence in Saudi Arabia, which is where he was born, and had many connections with the Saud family.

Saudi Arabia does move against militant or fanatic Islamic clerics with both haste and effiency.

You have the right to condemn the culture, our constitution gives that right to you.

However, no one has the right to force people to bend to what we think is culturally correct, a flawed philosophy that the US has practiced since the end of World War II.

By the way, in many cultures, the United States is seen as decadent, repressive, barbaric, even brutal.  We built this country on stolen land, genocide, slavery and wars of conquest.

We have a country that is entertained by violence, modern gladiator sports that can be seen in every home in the country.  The largest grossing films are usually full of violence, excessive blood and gore.

Professional sports that have fans in all walks of life are aired on tv and cable for our entertainment, it is not just 'red necked' illiterate people that find professional boxing, ultimate fighting, total contact fighting, and even hockey (remember the joke, I went to a fight and a hocky game broke out) entertaining.

Studies have shown that many Americans watch professional sports to see accidents, crashes and injuries.  Even in High School football you will find people who feel the best way to win a game is put opposing players on the sidelines with injuries.  In my high school, we were awarded stars for every player we put on the sidelines in a game.

Even our own chosen lifestyle is based on controlled violence (either that or all those crops, whips, floggers that are sold to bdsm enthuesiasts are purely for decoration.)

Now, which culture is wrong?  In a civilized world, both would be, the Saudi culture as well as our own.





Vendaval -> RE: And we support this regime why again? (3/27/2009 10:04:16 PM)

Very well reasoned and written, jlf. 




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875